Does training family physicians in shared decision making promote optimal use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections? Study protocol of a pilot clustered randomised controlled trial

France Légaré, Michel Labrecque, Annie Leblanc, Robert Thivierge, Gaston Godin, Claudine Laurier, Luc Côté, Annette M O'Connor, Nadine Allain-Boulé, Jean Rousseau, Sylvie Tapp, France Légaré, Michel Labrecque, Annie Leblanc, Robert Thivierge, Gaston Godin, Claudine Laurier, Luc Côté, Annette M O'Connor, Nadine Allain-Boulé, Jean Rousseau, Sylvie Tapp

Abstract

Background: In North America, although it varies according to the specific type of acute respiratory infections (ARI), use of antibiotics is estimated to be well above the expected prevalence of bacterial infections. The objective of this pilot clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the feasibility of a larger clustered RCT aiming at evaluating the impact of DECISION+, a continuing professional development (CPD) program in shared decision making, on the optimal use of antibiotics in the context of ARI.

Methods/design: This pilot study is a cluster RCT conducted with family physicians from Family Medicine Groups (FMG) in the Quebec City area, Canada. Participating FMG are randomised to an immediate DECISION+ group, a CPD program in shared decision making, (experimental group), or a delayed DECISION+ group (control group). Data collection involves recruiting five patients consulting for ARI per physician from both study groups before (Phase 1) and after (Phase 2) exposure of the experimental group to the DECISION+ program, and after exposure of the control group to the DECISION+ program (Phase 3). The primary outcome measures to assess the feasibility of a larger RCT include: 1) proportion of contacted FMG that agree to participate; 2) proportion of recruited physicians who participate in the DECISION+ program; 3) level of satisfaction of physicians regarding DECISION+; and 4) proportion of missing data in each data collection phase. Levels of agreement of the patient-physician dyad on the Decisional Conflict Scale and physicians' prescription profile for ARI are performed as secondary outcome measures.

Discussion: This study protocol is informative for researchers and clinicians interested in designing and/or conducting clustered RCT with FMG regarding training of physicians in shared decision making.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00354315.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision+ Conceptual Framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Decision+ Trial Design.

References

    1. Lomas J, Lavis JN. Guidelines in the mist. McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper 96-23; 1996.
    1. Hing E, Cherry DK, Woodwell DA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 summary. Adv Data. 2006. pp. 1–33.
    1. Alberta Clinical Practice Guideline Working Group . Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of acute pharyngitis. Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines Program; 1999.
    1. Ip S, Fu L, Balk E, Chew P, Devine D, Lau J. Evidence report/Technology Assessment Report Number No 124. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville, MD; 2005. Update on Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis.
    1. Rutschmann OT, Domino ME. Antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections in ambulatory practice in the United States, 1997–1999: does physician specialty matter? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17:196–200.
    1. Gonzales R, Steiner JF, Lum A, Barrett PH., Jr Decreasing antibiotic use in ambulatory practice: impact of a multidimensional intervention on the treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis in adults. JAMA. 1999;281:1512–1519. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.16.1512.
    1. Steinman MA, Gonzales R, Linder JA, Landefeld CS. Changing use of antibiotics in community-based outpatient practice, 1991–1999. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:525–533.
    1. Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Gonzales R. Predictors of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in adult primary care. JAMA. 2003;289:719–725. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.6.719.
    1. Nash DR, Harman J, Wald ER, Kelleher KJ. Antibiotic prescribing by primary care physicians for children with upper respiratory tract infections. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:1114–1119.
    1. Linder JA, Singer DE. Desire for antibiotics and antibiotic prescribing for adults with upper respiratory tract infections. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:795–801. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21101.x.
    1. Linder JA, Singer DE, Stafford RS. Association between antibiotic prescribing and visit duration in adults with upper respiratory tract infections. Clin Ther. 2003;25:2419–2430. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80284-9.
    1. Linder JA, Stafford RS. Antibiotic treatment of adults with sore throat by community primary care physicians: a national survey, 1989–1999. JAMA. 2001;286:1181–1186. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.10.1181.
    1. Dosh SA, Hickner JM, Mainous AG, Ebell MH. Predictors of antibiotic prescribing for nonspecific upper respiratory infections, acute bronchitis, and acute sinusitis. An UPRNet study (Upper Peninsula Research Network) J Fam Pract. 2000;49:407–414.
    1. McCaig LF, Besser RE, Hughes JM. Trends in antimicrobial prescribing rates for children and adolescents. JAMA. 2002;287:3096–3102. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.23.3096.
    1. Halasa NB, Griffin MR, Zhu Y, Edwards KM. Decreased number of antibiotic prescriptions in office-based settings from 1993 to 1999 in children less than five years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21:1023–1028. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200211000-00009.
    1. Kozyrskyj AL, Carrie AG, Mazowita GB, Lix LM, Klassen TP, Law BJ. Decrease in antibiotic use among children in the 1990s: not all antibiotics, not all children. CMAJ. 2004;171:133–138.
    1. Finkelstein JA, Huang SS, Daniel J, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman K, Goldmann D, Pelton SI, DeMaria A, Platt R. Antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era: predictors of carriage in a multicommunity sample. Pediatrics. 2003;112:862–869. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.4.862.
    1. Duijn HJv, Kuyvenhoven MM, Tiebosch HM, Schellevis FG, Verheij TJ. Diagnostic labelling as determinant of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract episodes in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-55.
    1. Clinical evidence. The international source of the best available evidence for effective health care
    1. Minelli C, Abrams KR, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ. Benefits and harms associated with hormone replacement therapy: clinical decision analysis. BMJ. 2004;328:371–370. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.371.
    1. Santesso N, Maxwell L, Tugwell PS, Wells GA, O'Connor AM, Judd M, Buchbinder R. Knowledge transfer to clinicians and consumers by the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:2312–2318.
    1. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) Innovation in Action. Knowledge Translation Strategy 2004–2009. Report Number Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
    1. Dolan JG. A method for evaluating health care providers' decision making: the Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument. Med Decis Making. 1999;19:38–41. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900105.
    1. Légaré F, Graham ID, O'Connor AM, Dolan JG, Bélanger-Ducharme F. Prise de décision partagée: traduction et validation d'une échelle de confort décisionnel du médecin. Pédagogie Médicale. 2003;4:216–222.
    1. Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, Feldman-Stewart D. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:281–292. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256005.
    1. Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Goulet F, van der Vleuten C. The Script Concordance test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med. 2000;12:189–195. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1204_5.
    1. Brailovsky C, Charlin B, Beausoleil S, Cote S, Van der Vleuten C. Measurement of clinical reflective capacity early in training as a predictor of clinical reasoning performance at the end of residency: an experimental study on the script concordance test. Med Educ. 2001;35:430–436. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00911.x.
    1. Sibert L, Charlin B, Corcos J, Gagnon R, Grise P, van der Vleuten C. Stability of clinical reasoning assessment results with the Script Concordance test across two different linguistic, cultural and learning environments. Med Teach. 2002;24:522–527. doi: 10.1080/0142159021000012599.
    1. Charlin B, Gagnon R, Pelletier J, Coletti M, Abi-Rizk G, Nasr C, Sauve E, Van Der Vleuten C. Assessment of clinical reasoning in the context of uncertainty: The effect of variability within the reference panel. Med Educ. 2006;40:848–854. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02541.x.
    1. Meterissian SH. A novel method of assessing clinical reasoning in surgical residents. Surg Innov. 2006;13:115–119. doi: 10.1177/1553350606291042.
    1. Sibert L, Darmoni SJ, Dahamna B, Hellot MF, Weber J, Charlin B. On line clinical reasoning assessment with Script Concordance test in urology: results of a French pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-45.
    1. Gerrity MS, DeVellis RF, Earp JA. Physicians' reactions to uncertainty in patient care. A new measure and new insights. Med Care. 1990;28:724–736. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199008000-00005.
    1. Gerrity MS, White KP, DeVellis RF, Dittus RS. Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty: Refining the Constructs and Scales. Motiv Emot. 1995;19:175–191. doi: 10.1007/BF02250510.
    1. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press; 1988.
    1. Légaré F, Graham ID, O'Connor AM, Aubin M, Baillargeon L, Leduc YJM. Prediction of health professionals' intention to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice. Health Expect. 2007;10:369–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00465.x.
    1. Legare F, O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Wells GA, Tremblay S. Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the Agreement and the Difference between Patients' and Physicians' Decisional Conflict. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:373–390. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06290492.
    1. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–1433.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться