High risk of severe anaemia after chlorproguanil-dapsone+artesunate antimalarial treatment in patients with G6PD (A-) deficiency

Caterina I Fanello, Corine Karema, Pamela Avellino, Germana Bancone, Aline Uwimana, Sue J Lee, Umberto d'Alessandro, David Modiano, Caterina I Fanello, Corine Karema, Pamela Avellino, Germana Bancone, Aline Uwimana, Sue J Lee, Umberto d'Alessandro, David Modiano

Abstract

Background: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common inherited human enzyme defect. This deficiency provides some protection from clinical malaria, but it can also cause haemolysis after administration of drugs with oxidant properties.

Methods: The safety of chlorproguanil-dapsone+artesunate (CD+A) and amodiaquine+sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AQ+SP) for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria was evaluated according to G6PD deficiency in a secondary analysis of an open-label, randomized clinical trial. 702 children, treated with CD+A or AQ+SP and followed for 28 days after treatment were genotyped for G6PD A- deficiency.

Findings: In the first 4 days following CD+A treatment, mean haematocrit declined on average 1.94% (95% CI 1.54 to 2.33) and 1.05% per day (95% CI 0.95 to 1.15) respectively in patients with G6PD deficiency and normal patients; a mean reduction of 1.3% per day was observed among patients who received AQ+SP regardless of G6PD status (95% CI 1.25 to 1.45). Patients with G6PD deficiency recipients of CD+A had significantly lower haematocrit than the other groups until day 7 (p = 0.04). In total, 10 patients had severe post-treatment haemolysis requiring blood transfusion. Patients with G6PD deficiency showed a higher risk of severe anaemia following treatment with CD+A (RR = 10.2; 95% CI 1.8 to 59.3) or AQ+SP (RR = 5.6; 95% CI 1.0 to 32.7).

Conclusions: CD+A showed a poor safety profile in individuals with G6PD deficiency most likely as a result of dapsone induced haemolysis. Screening for G6PD deficiency before drug administration of potentially pro-oxidants drugs, like dapsone-containing combinations, although seldom available, is necessary.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00461578.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Mean PCV according to treatment…
Figure 1. Mean PCV according to treatment group (AQ+SP: amodiaquine+sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and CD+A: chlorproguanil-dapsone+artesunate), G6PD status (deficient: hemizygous males and homozygous females) and day of follow-up.

References

    1. Fanello CI, Karema C, Ngamije D, Uwimana A, Ndahindwa V, et al. A randomised trial to assess the efficacy and safety of chlorproguanil/dapsone+artesunate for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:412–420.
    1. Beutler E, Vulliamy TJ. Hematologically Important Mutations: Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase. Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases. 2002;28:93–103.
    1. Tishkoff SA, Varkonyi R, Cahinhinan N, Abbes S, Argyropoulos G, et al. Haplotype diversity and linkage disequilibrium at human G6PD: recent origin of alleles that confer malarial resistance. Science. 2001;293:455–462.
    1. Ruwende C, Khoo SC, Snow RW, Yates SN, Kwiatkowski D, et al. Natural selection of hemi- and heterozygotes for G6PD deficiency in Africa by resistance to severe malaria. Nature. 1995;376:246–249.
    1. Beutler E, Duparc S. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and antimalarial drug development. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:779–789.
    1. Battistuzzi G, Esan GJ, Fasuan FA, Modiano G, Luzzatto L. Comparison of GdA and GdB activities in Nigerians. A study of the variation of the G6PD activity. Am J Hum Genet. 1977;29:31–36.
    1. Wolf R, Matz H, Orion E, Tuzun B, T Y. Dapsone. Dermatology Online Journal. 2002;8:2.
    1. Brabin BJ, Eggelte TA, Parise M, Verhoeff F. Dapsone therapy for malaria during pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes. Drug Saf. 2004;27:633–648.
    1. WHO. Assessment and monitoring of antimalarial drug efficacy for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. WHO/HTM/RBM/2003.50 WHO/HTM/RBM/2003.50.
    1. WHO. Review of the safety of chlorproguanil-dapsone in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Africa. 2004. WHO/HTM/MAL/2005.1106. Geneva. WHO/HTM/MAL/2005.1106 WHO/HTM/MAL/2005.1106.
    1. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 1991;10:506–513.
    1. White NJ, Ho M. The pathophysiology of malaria. In: Baker JR, Muller E R, editors. Advances in Parasitology. Academic Press; 1992. pp. 84–175.
    1. Wootton DG, Opara H, Biagini GA, Kanjala MK, Duparc S, et al. Open-Label Comparative Clinical Study of Chlorproguanil-Dapsone Fixed Dose Combination (Lapdaptrade mark) Alone or with Three Different Doses of Artesunate for Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1779.
    1. Degowin RL, Eppes RB, Powell RD, Carson PE. The haemolytic effects of diaphenylsulfone (DDS) in normal subjects and in those with glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase deficiency. Bull World Health Organ. 1966;35:165–179.
    1. Taylor WR, White NJ. Antimalarial drug toxicity: a review. Drug Saf. 2004;27:25–61.
    1. Sulo J, Chimpeni P, Hatcher J, Kublin JG, Plowe CV, et al. Chlorproguanil-dapsone versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for sequential episodes of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kenya and Malawi: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1136–1143.
    1. Alloueche A, Bailey W, Barton S, Bwika J, Chimpeni P, et al. Comparison of chlorproguanil-dapsone with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in young African children: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1843–1848.
    1. WHO QSM/MC/IEA.117;2008.
    1. Munyanganizi R, Cotton F, Vertongen F, Gulbis B. Red blood cell disorders in Rwandese neonates: screening for sickle cell disease and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Journal of Medical Screening. 2006;13:129–131.
    1. Last access 19 March 2008.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться