Segregation analysis of low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the collaborative Lipid Research Clinics Program Family Study

K D Bucher, E B Kaplan, K K Namboodiri, C J Glueck, P Laskarzewski, B M Rifkind, K D Bucher, E B Kaplan, K K Namboodiri, C J Glueck, P Laskarzewski, B M Rifkind

Abstract

Complex segregation analysis with the unified mixed model in white families from nine lipid research clinics was carried out to delineate the mode of familial transmission of plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Three groups of families from the collaborative Lipid Research Clinics Program Family Study were assessed: 1,146 selected at random, 483 obtained through hypercholesterolemic probands, and 177 selected from the random sample because a number had low HDL-C, the sample sizes being 4,279, 1,807 and 735, respectively. The data were first transformed and adjusted for effects of covariates. Analyses were performed within clinic and selection strata and also pooled across clinics within strata. The results were consistent across strata and identified two major HDL-C clusters with means separated by approximately 3 SD. There was significant evidence of transmission of a major factor for low HDL-C, but transmission did not conform to Mendelian segregation expectations. There was also evidence of significant multifactorial transmission. Since low HDL-C levels are a major independent risk factor for coronary heart disease, the association of a major factor with familial aggregation of low HDL-C emphasizes the importance of detailed within-family sampling for low HDL-C after identifying a proband whose predominant dyslipoproteinemia is low HDL-C.

References

    1. Atherosclerosis. 1979 Dec;34(4):419-29
    1. Atherosclerosis. 1980 May;36(1):101-9
    1. Clin Genet. 1980 Jan;17(1):13-25
    1. Clin Chim Acta. 1981 Jul 18;114(1):45-52
    1. Hum Hered. 1981;31(5):312-21
    1. Pediatrics. 1982 Mar;69(3):308-16
    1. Hum Hered. 1982;32(1):24-36
    1. Med Clin North Am. 1982 Mar;66(2):469-84
    1. Metabolism. 1982 Jun;31(6):521-3
    1. N Engl J Med. 1982 Jun 24;306(25):1513-9
    1. Lancet. 1975 Jan 4;1(7897):16-9
    1. Metabolism. 1975 Nov;24(11):1243-65
    1. J Lab Clin Med. 1976 Dec;88(6):941-57
    1. Circulation. 1977 May;55(5):767-72
    1. Am J Med. 1977 May;62(5):707-14
    1. Atherosclerosis. 1977 Aug;27(4):387-406
    1. Clin Genet. 1977 Oct;12(4):208-12
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1978 Jan;30(1):28-37
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1978 Nov;30(6):583-9
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1979 Jan;31(1):62-9
    1. Clin Genet. 1979 Apr;15(4):300-6
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Mar;109(3):285-95
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Mar;109(3):296-308
    1. Atherosclerosis. 1979 Mar;32(3):269-76
    1. Ann Hum Genet. 1979 May;42(4):467-77
    1. Atherosclerosis. 1979 Jul;33(3):365-70
    1. Stroke. 1982 May-Jun;13(3):360-5
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1982 Nov;34(6):888-903
    1. Lancet. 1983 Feb 26;1(8322):444-6
    1. Am J Med Genet. 1983 Jun;15(2):195-203
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Sep;35(5):816-26
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Nov;35(6):1179-89
    1. Arteriosclerosis. 1983 Nov-Dec;3(6):616-26
    1. Metabolism. 1984 Feb;33(2):136-46
    1. Atherosclerosis. 1984 Apr;51(1):21-9
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Jun;119(6):944-58
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Jun;119(6):959-74
    1. Am J Med Genet. 1984 Jul;18(3):435-48
    1. Genet Epidemiol. 1984;1(1):43-51
    1. Genet Epidemiol. 1985;2(3):227-54
    1. Genet Epidemiol. 1985;2(3):283-300
    1. Am Heart J. 1985 Nov;110(5):1107-15
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Feb;38(2):228-34
    1. N Engl J Med. 1986 Mar 13;314(11):671-7
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Mar;38(3):373-81
    1. Am J Med Genet. 1986 May;24(1):57-67
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1975 May;27(3):365-84
    1. J Clin Invest. 1964 Feb;43:228-36

Source: PubMed

Подписаться