Macrochimerism and clinical transplant tolerance

John D Scandling, Stephan Busque, Robert Lowsky, Judith Shizuru, Asha Shori, Edgar Engleman, Kent Jensen, Samuel Strober, John D Scandling, Stephan Busque, Robert Lowsky, Judith Shizuru, Asha Shori, Edgar Engleman, Kent Jensen, Samuel Strober

Abstract

Current theory holds that macrochimerism is essential to the development of transplant tolerance. Hematopoietic cell transplantation from the solid organ donor is necessary to achieve macrochimerism. Over the last 10-20 years, trials of tolerance induction with combined kidney and hematopoietic cell transplantation have moved from the preclinical to the clinical arena. The achievement of macrochimerism in the clinical setting is challenging, and potentially toxic due to the conditioning regimen necessary to hematopoietic cell transplantation and due to the risk of graft-versus-host disease. There are differences in chimerism goals and methods of the three major clinical stage tolerance induction strategies in both HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched living donor kidney transplantation, with consequent differences in efficacy and safety. The Stanford protocol has proven efficacious in the induction of tolerance in HLA-matched kidney transplantation, allowing cessation of immunosuppressive drug therapy in 80% of study participants, with the safety profile of conventional transplantation. In HLA-mismatched transplantation, multi-lineage macrochimerism of over a year's duration can now be consistently achieved with the Stanford protocol, with complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive drug therapy during the second post-transplant year as the next experimental step and test of tolerance.

Keywords: Chimerism; Hematopoietic cell transplantation; Immune tolerance; Kidney transplantation.

Copyright © 2018 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1A. Stanford tolerance induction protocol; the recipient’s procedures in the HLA-matched trial. rATG, rabbit antithymocyte globin; TLI, total lymphoid irradiation; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; GVHD, graft versus host disease Figure 1B. Stanford tolerance induction protocol; the recipient’s procedures in the HLA-mismatched trial. rATG, rabbit antithymocyte globin; TLI, total lymphoid irradiation; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; GVHD, graft versus host disease
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1A. Stanford tolerance induction protocol; the recipient’s procedures in the HLA-matched trial. rATG, rabbit antithymocyte globin; TLI, total lymphoid irradiation; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; GVHD, graft versus host disease Figure 1B. Stanford tolerance induction protocol; the recipient’s procedures in the HLA-mismatched trial. rATG, rabbit antithymocyte globin; TLI, total lymphoid irradiation; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; GVHD, graft versus host disease
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stanford tolerance induction protocol; examples of macrochimerism patterns in the HLA-matched trial.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Stanford tolerance induction protocol; examples of macrochimerism patterns in the HLA-mismatched trial.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться