Effects of intraoperative PEEP optimization on postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Zoltán Ruszkai, Erika Kiss, Ildikó László, Fanni Gyura, Erika Surány, Péter Töhötöm Bartha, Gergely Péter Bokrétás, Edit Rácz, István Buzogány, Zoltán Bajory, Erzsébet Hajdú, Zsolt Molnár, Zoltán Ruszkai, Erika Kiss, Ildikó László, Fanni Gyura, Erika Surány, Péter Töhötöm Bartha, Gergely Péter Bokrétás, Edit Rácz, István Buzogány, Zoltán Bajory, Erzsébet Hajdú, Zsolt Molnár

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation during major abdominal surgery commonly develop pulmonary atelectasis and/or hyperdistention of the lungs. Recent studies show benefits of lung-protective mechanical ventilation with the use of low tidal volumes, a moderate level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and regular alveolar recruitment maneuvers during general anesthesia, even in patients with healthy lungs. The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of intraoperative lung-protective mechanical ventilation, using individualized PEEP values, on postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response.

Methods/design: A total number of 40 patients with bladder cancer undergoing open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (ileal conduit or orthotopic bladder substitute) will be enrolled and randomized into a study (SG) and a control group (CG). Standard lung-protective ventilation with a PEEP of 6 cmH2O will be applied in the CG and an optimal PEEP value determined during a static pulmonary compliance (Cstat)-directed PEEP titration procedure will be used in the SG. Low tidal volumes (6 mL/Kg ideal bodyweight) and a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5 will be applied in both groups. After surgery both groups will receive standard postoperative management. Primary endpoints are postoperative pulmonary complications and serum procalcitonin kinetics during and after surgery until the third postoperative day. Secondary and tertiary endpoints will be: organ dysfunction as monitored by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, in-hospital stay, 28-day and in-hospital mortality.

Discussion: This trial will assess the possible benefits or disadvantages of an individualized lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategy during open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion regarding postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02931409 . Registered on 5 October 2016.

Keywords: Lung-protective ventilation; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Postoperative pulmonary complications; Procalcitonin; Radical cystectomy; Static pulmonary compliance.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Hungarian Scientific and Medical Research Council Ethics Committee (Egészségügyi Tudományos Tanács Tudományos Kutatás Etikai Bizottság ETT-TUKEB; chairperson: Professor Dr. Zsuzsanna Schaff; registration number 21586-4/2016/EKU) on 17 June 2016 and the Local Ethics Committee of Péterfy Sándor Hospital Budapest (Péterfy Sándor utcai Kórház Intézeti Kutatásetikai Bizottság IKEB; chairperson: Dr. Mária Vas; registration number CO-338-045) on 12 September 2016 and the Regional Ethics Committee of the University of Szeged (Regionális Humán Orvosbiológiai Tudományos és Kutatásetikai Bizottság RKEB; chairperson: Dr. Tibor Wittmann; registration number 149/2016-SZTE) on 19 September 2016. This study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was prospectively registered on 5 October 2016 at Participants fulfilling the inclusion criteria will sign an Informed Consent Form during their perioperative assessment. Withdrawal of consent may be initiated by the participant at any time during the trial.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendation for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) schedule of enrollment, interventions and assessments. DOS day of surgery, POD postoperative day, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, ICU intensive care unit
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flowchart. PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, PCT procalcitonin, ABGs arterial blood gas sample, CVBGs central venous blood gas sample, Cstat static pulmonary compliance, Vds/Vt dead space fraction, Raw airway resistance, MAP mean arterial pressure, ARM alveolar recruitment maneuver, PRBC packed red blood cell, FFP fresh frozen plasma, IAP intraabdominal pressure

References

    1. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2126–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707.
    1. Ricard J-D, Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury. Eur Respir J. 2003;22(Suppl 42):2–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00420103.
    1. Futier E, Constantin J-M, Paugam-Burtz C, et al. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:428–37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301082.
    1. Hemmes SN, Gama De Abreu M, Pelosi P, et al. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384:495–503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62030-4.
    1. Sutherasan Y, Vargas M, Pelosi P. Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18:211. doi: 10.1186/cc13778.
    1. Futier E, Constantin J-M, Pelosi P, et al. Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1310–9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc640a.
    1. Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, et al. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:298–305. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a.
    1. Mols G, Priebe H-J, Guttmann J. Alveolar recruitment in acute lung injury. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:156–66. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei299.
    1. Talley HC, Bentz N, Georgievski J, et al. Anesthesia providers’ knowledge and use of alveolar recruitment maneuvers. J Anesth Clin Res. 2012;3:325.
    1. Chacko J, Rani U. Alveolar recruitment maneuvers in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009;13:1–6. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.53107.
    1. Siobal MS, Ong H, Valdes J, et al. Calculation of physiologic dead space: comparison of ventilator volumetric capnography to measurements by metabolic analyzer and volumetric CO2 monitor. Respir Care. 2013;58:1143–51. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02116.
    1. El-Baradey GF, El-Shamaa NS. Compliance versus dead space for optimum positive end expiratory pressure determination in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:508–12. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.138150.
    1. Pelosi P, Gama De Abreu M, Rocco PRM. New and conventional strategies for lung recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2010;14:210. doi: 10.1186/cc8851.
    1. Vargas M, Sutherasan Y, Gregoretti C, et al. PEEP role in ICU and operating room: from pathophysiology to clinical practice. Sci World J. 2014
    1. Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85:109–17. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.1.109.
    1. Lindberg M, Hole A, Johnsen H, et al. Reference intervals for procalcitonin and C-reactive protein after major abdominal surgery. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2002;62:189–94. doi: 10.1080/003655102317475443.
    1. Sido B, Teklote JR, Hartel M, et al. Inflammatory response after abdominal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004;18:439–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2003.12.006.
    1. Sarbinowski R, Arvidsson S, Tylman M, et al. Plasma concentration of procalcitonin and systemic inflammatory response syndrome after colorectal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:191–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00565.x.
    1. Mokart D, Merlin M, Sannini A, et al. Procalcitonin, interleukin 6 and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS): early markers of postoperative sepsis after major surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:767–73. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei143.
    1. Bogár L, Molnár Z, Tarsoly P, et al. Serum procalcitonin level and leukocyte antisedimentation rate as early predictors of respiratory dysfunction after oesophageal tumour resection. Crit Care. 2006;10:R110. doi: 10.1186/cc4992.
    1. Minami E, Ito S, Sugiura T, et al. Markedly elevated procalcitonin in early postoperative period in pediatric open heart surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care. 2014;2:38. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-38.
    1. Trasy D, Tánczos K, Németh M, et al. Early procalcitonin kinetics and appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients. A prospective observational study. J Crit Care. 2016;34:50–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.007.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться