Mortality risk prediction of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in suspected acute coronary syndrome: A cohort study

Amit Kaura, Adam Hartley, Vasileios Panoulas, Ben Glampson, Anoop S V Shah, Jim Davies, Abdulrahim Mulla, Kerrie Woods, Joe Omigie, Anoop D Shah, Mark R Thursz, Paul Elliott, Harry Hemmingway, Bryan Williams, Folkert W Asselbergs, Michael O'Sullivan, Graham M Lord, Adam Trickey, Jonathan Ac Sterne, Dorian O Haskard, Narbeh Melikian, Darrel P Francis, Wolfgang Koenig, Ajay M Shah, Rajesh Kharbanda, Divaka Perera, Riyaz S Patel, Keith M Channon, Jamil Mayet, Ramzi Khamis, Amit Kaura, Adam Hartley, Vasileios Panoulas, Ben Glampson, Anoop S V Shah, Jim Davies, Abdulrahim Mulla, Kerrie Woods, Joe Omigie, Anoop D Shah, Mark R Thursz, Paul Elliott, Harry Hemmingway, Bryan Williams, Folkert W Asselbergs, Michael O'Sullivan, Graham M Lord, Adam Trickey, Jonathan Ac Sterne, Dorian O Haskard, Narbeh Melikian, Darrel P Francis, Wolfgang Koenig, Ajay M Shah, Rajesh Kharbanda, Divaka Perera, Riyaz S Patel, Keith M Channon, Jamil Mayet, Ramzi Khamis

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence on the use of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as a biomarker for selecting patients for advanced cardiovascular (CV) therapies in the modern era. The prognostic value of mildly elevated hsCRP beyond troponin in a large real-world cohort of unselected patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unknown. We evaluated whether a mildly elevated hsCRP (up to 15 mg/L) was associated with mortality risk, beyond troponin level, in patients with suspected ACS.

Methods and findings: We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the National Institute for Health Research Health Informatics Collaborative data of 257,948 patients with suspected ACS who had a troponin measured at 5 cardiac centres in the United Kingdom between 2010 and 2017. Patients were divided into 4 hsCRP groups (<2, 2 to 4.9, 5 to 9.9, and 10 to 15 mg/L). The main outcome measure was mortality within 3 years of index presentation. The association between hsCRP levels and all-cause mortality was assessed using multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, haemoglobin, white cell count (WCC), platelet count, creatinine, and troponin. Following the exclusion criteria, there were 102,337 patients included in the analysis (hsCRP <2 mg/L (n = 38,390), 2 to 4.9 mg/L (n = 27,397), 5 to 9.9 mg/L (n = 26,957), and 10 to 15 mg/L (n = 9,593)). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, there was a positive and graded relationship between hsCRP level and mortality at baseline, which remained at 3 years (hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) of 1.32 (1.18 to 1.48) for those with hsCRP 2.0 to 4.9 mg/L and 1.40 (1.26 to 1.57) and 2.00 (1.75 to 2.28) for those with hsCRP 5 to 9.9 mg/L and 10 to 15 mg/L, respectively. This relationship was independent of troponin in all suspected ACS patients and was further verified in those who were confirmed to have an ACS diagnosis by clinical coding. The main limitation of our study is that we did not have data on underlying cause of death; however, the exclusion of those with abnormal WCC or hsCRP levels >15 mg/L makes it unlikely that sepsis was a major contributor.

Conclusions: These multicentre, real-world data from a large cohort of patients with suspected ACS suggest that mildly elevated hsCRP (up to 15 mg/L) may be a clinically meaningful prognostic marker beyond troponin and point to its potential utility in selecting patients for novel treatments targeting inflammation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT03507309.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: WK is a member of the Executive Steering Committee of CANTOS and has received modest amounts for consulting from Novartis). All remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow of patients through the…
Fig 1. Flow of patients through the study.
*Suspected ACS characterised by the request of a troponin. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; WCC, white cell count.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Unadjusted Kaplan–Meier mortality curves by (A) hsCRP level, (B) hsCRP level and troponin positivity, and (C) hsCRP level in a subgroup of patients with ACS. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; Tn +, troponin positive, Tn −, troponin negative.
Fig 3. Multivariable Cox regression analysis with…
Fig 3. Multivariable Cox regression analysis with time-varying coefficients.
HRs are adjusted for age, sex, haemoglobin, WCC, platelet count, creatinine, and troponin level. The adjusted HRs were calculated during the following time periods:

Fig 4

Relationship between negative predictive value…

Fig 4

Relationship between negative predictive value of hsCRP and troponin testing with (A) 30-day…
Fig 4
Relationship between negative predictive value of hsCRP and troponin testing with (A) 30-day and (B) 3-year mortality. hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; hsCRP −, negative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; Tn −, negative troponin.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Relationship between negative predictive value of hsCRP and troponin testing with (A) 30-day and (B) 3-year mortality. hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; hsCRP −, negative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; Tn −, negative troponin.

References

    1. Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1685–95. Epub 2005/04/22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043430 .
    1. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(12):836–43. Epub 2000/03/25. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003233421202 .
    1. Ridker PM, Koenig W, Kastelein JJ, Mach F, Luscher TF. Has the time finally come to measure hsCRP universally in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention? Eur Heart J. 2018;39(46):4109–11. Epub 2018/11/20. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy723 .
    1. Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Grillo RL, Rebuzzi AG, Pepys MB, et al.. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid a protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(7):417–24. Epub 1994/08/18. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408183310701 .
    1. Berk BC, Weintraub WS, Alexander RW. Elevation of C-reactive protein in "active" coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65(3):168–72. Epub 1990/01/15. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90079-g .
    1. Koenig W, Sund M, Frohlich M, Fischer HG, Lowel H, Doring A, et al.. C-Reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy middle-aged men: results from the MONICA (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992. Circulation. 1999;99(2):237–42. Epub 1999/01/20. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.2.237 .
    1. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(14):973–9. Epub 1997/04/03. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704033361401 .
    1. Koenig W, Khuseyinova N, Baumert J, Meisinger C. Prospective study of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a determinant of mortality: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984–1998. Clin Chem. 2008;54(2):335–42. Epub 2007/12/25. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.100271 .
    1. Brunetti ND, Troccoli R, Correale M, Pellegrino PL, Di Biase M. C-reactive protein in patients with acute coronary syndrome: correlation with diagnosis, myocardial damage, ejection fraction and angiographic findings. Int J Cardiol. 2006;109(2):248–56. Epub 2005/08/02. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.021 .
    1. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Antman EM, Weiner DL, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, et al.. C-reactive protein is a potent predictor of mortality independently of and in combination with troponin T in acute coronary syndromes: a TIMI 11A substudy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(7):1460–5. Epub 1998/06/17. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00136-3 .
    1. Seifarth H, Schlett CL, Lehman SJ, Bamberg F, Donnelly P, Januzzi JL, et al.. Correlation of concentrations of high-sensitivity troponin T and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with plaque progression as measured by CT coronary angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(6):452–8. Epub 2014/12/04. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.09.005 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4487607.
    1. Fracassi F, Niccoli G, Vetrugno V, Russo M, Rettura F, Vergni F, et al.. Optical coherence tomography and C-reactive protein in risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:7–12. Epub 2019/01/28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.058 .
    1. Wensley F, Gao P, Burgess S, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Shah T, et al.. Association between C reactive protein and coronary heart disease: mendelian randomisation analysis based on individual participant data. Br Med J. 2011;342:d548. Epub 2011/02/18. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d548 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3039696.
    1. Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Pennells L, Wood AM, White IR, Gao P, et al.. C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and cardiovascular disease prediction. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1310–20. Epub 2012/10/05. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107477 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3714101.
    1. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al.. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–31. Epub 2017/08/29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914 .
    1. Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Everett BM, Libby P, Thuren T, Glynn RJ. Relationship of C-reactive protein reduction to cardiovascular event reduction following treatment with canakinumab: a secondary analysis from the CANTOS randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10118):319–28. Epub 2017/11/18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32814-3 .
    1. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Pradhan A, MacFadyen JG, Solomon DH, Zaharris E, et al.. Low-Dose Methotrexate for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events. N Engl J Med. 2018. Epub 2018/11/13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809798 .
    1. Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, Bertrand OF, Diaz R, Maggioni AP, et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2497–505. Epub 2019/11/17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912388 Epub 2019 Nov 16. .
    1. Nidorf SM, Fiolet ATL, Mosterd A, Eikelboom JW, Schut A, Opstal TSJ, et al.. Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020. Epub 2020/09/01. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021372 .
    1. Kaura A, Arnold AD, Panoulas V, Glampson B, Davies J, Mulla A, et al.. Prognostic significance of troponin level in 3121 patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (The NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative TROP-AF study). J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(7):e013684. Epub 2020/03/28. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013684 .
    1. Kaura A, Panoulas V, Glampson B, Davies J, Mulla A, Woods K, et al.. Association of troponin level and age with mortality in 250 000 patients: cohort study across five UK acute care centres. Br Med J. 2019;367:l6055. Epub 2019/11/22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6055 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6865859
    1. Kaura A, Sterne JAC, Trickey A, Abbott S, Mulla A, Glampson B, et al.. Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data. Lancet. 2020;396(10251):623–34. Epub 2020/08/31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30930-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7456783.
    1. Wildi K, Gimenez MR, Twerenbold R, Reichlin T, Jaeger C, Heinzelmann A, et al.. Misdiagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Related to Limitations of the Current Regulatory Approach to Define Clinical Decision Values for Cardiac Troponin. Circulation. 2015;131(23):2032–40. Epub 2015/05/08. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014129 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4456170.
    1. Apple FS, Collinson PO. Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem. 2012;58(1):54–61. Epub 2011/10/04. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.165795 .
    1. Organization WH. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision: World Health Organization; 2018. [updated 2018-11-23 15:54:145th December 2018]. Available from: .
    1. Ridker PM, Devalaraja M, Baeres FMM, Engelmann MDM, Hovingh GK, Ivkovic M, et al.. IL-6 inhibition with ziltivekimab in patients at high atherosclerotic risk (RESCUE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021. Epub 2021/05/21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00520-1 .
    1. Mani P, Puri R, Schwartz GG, Nissen SE, Shao M, Kastelein JJP, et al.. Association of Initial and Serial C-Reactive Protein Levels With Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Death After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis of the VISTA-16 Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(4):314–20. Epub 2019/03/07. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0179 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6484785
    1. Ries W, Torzewski J, Heigl F, Pfluecke C, Kelle S, Darius H, et al.. C-Reactive Protein Apheresis as Anti-inflammatory Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the CAMI-1 Study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:591714. Epub 2021/03/30. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.591714 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7988098.
    1. Stone GW, Selker HP, Thiele H, Patel MR, Udelson JE, Ohman EM, et al.. Relationship Between Infarct Size and Outcomes Following Primary PCI: Patient-Level Analysis From 10 Randomized Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(14):1674–83. Epub 2016/04/09. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.069 .
    1. Swerdlow DI, Holmes MV, Kuchenbaecker KB, Engmann JE, Shah T, Sofat R, et al.. The interleukin-6 receptor as a target for prevention of coronary heart disease: a mendelian randomisation analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9822):1214–24. Epub 2012/03/17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60110-X ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3316968.
    1. Cook NR, Paynter NP, Eaton CB, Manson JE, Martin LW, Robinson JG, et al.. Comparison of the Framingham and Reynolds Risk scores for global cardiovascular risk prediction in the multiethnic Women’s Health Initiative. Circulation. 2012;125(14):1748–56, s1-11. Epub 2012/03/09. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.075929 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3324658.
    1. Kalkman DN, Aquino M, Claessen BE, Baber U, Guedeney P, Sorrentino S, et al.. Residual inflammatory risk and the impact on clinical outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(46):4101–8. Epub 2018/10/26. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy633 .
    1. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, et al.. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):226–35. Epub 2011/01/21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358 .

Source: PubMed

Подписаться