Acceptability, safety, and patterns of use of oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in South African adolescents: an open-label single-arm phase 2 trial

Katherine Gill, Leigh Johnson, Janan Dietrich, Landon Myer, Rebecca Marcus, Melissa Wallace, Tanya Pidwell, Eve Mendel, Lauren Fynn, Kai Jones, Lubbe Wiesner, Catherine Slack, Ann Strode, Hans Spiegel, Sybil Hosek, James Rooney, Glenda Gray, Linda-Gail Bekker, Katherine Gill, Leigh Johnson, Janan Dietrich, Landon Myer, Rebecca Marcus, Melissa Wallace, Tanya Pidwell, Eve Mendel, Lauren Fynn, Kai Jones, Lubbe Wiesner, Catherine Slack, Ann Strode, Hans Spiegel, Sybil Hosek, James Rooney, Glenda Gray, Linda-Gail Bekker

Abstract

Background: HIV incidence among adolescents in southern Africa remains unacceptably high. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention intervention but there are few data on its implementation among adolescents. We aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of PrEP with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine as part of a comprehensive HIV prevention package in an adolescent population in South Africa.

Methods: This open-label single-arm phase 2 study (PlusPills) was done in two research clinics in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa. Adolescents aged 15-19 years were recruited into the study through recruitment events and outreach in the community. Potential participants were eligible for enrolment if they reported being sexually active. Exclusion criteria were a positive test for HIV or pregnancy at enrolment, breastfeeding, or any relevant co-morbidities. Participants were given oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine for PrEP to take daily for the first 12 weeks and were then given the choice to opt in or out of PrEP use at three monthly intervals during scheduled clinic visits. Participants were invited to monthly visits for adherence counselling and HIV testing during the study period. The primary outcomes were acceptability, use, and safety of PrEP. Acceptability was measured by the proportion of participants who reported willingness to take up PrEP and remain on PrEP at each study timepoint. Use was defined as the number of participants who continued to use PrEP after the initial 12-week period until the end of the study (week 48). Safety was measured by grade 2, 3, and 4 laboratory and clinical adverse events using the Division of AIDS table for grading the severity of adult and paediatric adverse events, version 1.0. Dried blood spot samples were collected at each study time-point to measure tenofovir diphosphate concentrations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02213328.

Findings: Between April 28, 2015, and Nov 11, 2016, 244 participants were screened, and 148 participants were enrolled (median age was 18 years; 99 participants [67%] were female) and initiated PrEP. PrEP was stopped by 26 of the 148 (18%) participants at 12 weeks. Cumulative PrEP opt-out, from the total cohort, was 41% (60 of 148 participants) at week 24 and 43% (63 of 148 participants) at week 36. PrEP was well tolerated with only minor adverse events (grade 2) thought to be related to study drug, which included headache (n=4, 3%), gastrointestinal upset (n=8, 5%), and skin rash (n=2, 1%). Two participants (1%) experienced grade 3 weight loss, which was deemed related to the study drug and resolved fully when PrEP was discontinued. Tenofovir diphosphate concentrations were detectable (>16 fmol/punch) in dried blood spot samples in 108 (92%) of 118 participants who reported PrEP use at week 12, in 74 (74%) of 100 participants at week 24, and in 22 (59%) of 37 participants by the study end at week 48.

Interpretation: In this cohort of self-selected South African adolescents at risk of HIV acquisition, PrEP appears safe and tolerable in those who continued use. PrEP use decreased throughout the course of the study as the number of planned study visits declined. Adolescents in southern Africa needs access to PrEP with tailored adherence support and possibly the option for more frequent and flexible visit schedules.

Funding: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the US National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: JFR is an employee and stockholder of Gilead Sciences.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study Design for CHAMPS: Pilot study B: “PlusPills
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Consort Diagram for CHAMPS: Pilot study B: “PlusPills”
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
TFV-DP levels by week for CHAMPS: Pilot study B: “PlusPills”

References

    1. UNAIDS. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). [Internet]. UNAIDS; 2018. Switzerland [updated 2019 Jul 20; cited 2020 26 Feb]. Available from:
    1. Kharsany A, Karim Q. HIV Infection and AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: Current Status, Challenges and Opportunities. The Open AIDS Journal. 2016; 10(1):34–48.
    1. UNICEF. ALL IN to end the adolescent AIDS epidemic. Switzerland. UNICEF; [updated 2016 Dec 16; cited 2019 Apr 9]. Available from:
    1. Harrison A, Colvin CJ, Kuo C, Swartz Alison Swartz, Lurie M. Sustained High HIV Incidence in Young Women in Southern Africa: Social, Behavioral, and Structural Factors and Emerging Intervention Approaches. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. [Internet]. 2015. Dec [cited 2019 Apr 09]; 12(2):207–215. Available from: URL 10.1007/s11904-015-0261-0
    1. UNAIDS. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. AIDS by the numbers, AIDS is not over, but it can be. Switzerland. UNAIDS; 2016. [updated 2016 Nov 21; cited 2019 Apr 9]. Available from:
    1. Ramaphosa MC Let Our Actions Count: South Africa’s National Strategic Plan for HIV, TB and STIs 2017–2022. South African National AIDS Council. [Internet]. Pretoria. SANAC; 2017. [updated 2018 Mar 9; cited 2019 Apr 9] Available from:
    1. Buvé A, Bishikwabo-Nsarhaza K, Mutangadura G. The spread and effect of HIV-1 infection in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet. [Internet]. 2002. Jun [cited 2019 Apr 09]; 359(9322):2011–2017. Available from: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08848-7
    1. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention [Internet]. Avert. 2019. [cited 31 October 2019]. Available from:
    1. Women and HIV. A spotlight on adolescent girls and young women [Internet].UNAIDS. 2019. [cited 31 October 2019]. Available from:
    1. ART Adherence in Adolescents [Internet]. South Africa: SA HIV Clinicians Society; 2018. [cited 31 October 2019]. Available from:
    1. Jemmott JB 3rd., Jemmott LS, O’Leary A, Ngwane Z, Lewis DA, Bellamy SL, et al. HIV/STI risk-reduction intervention efficacy with South African adolescents over 54 months. Health Psychol. [Internet]. 2015. Jun [cited 2019 Apr 09]; 34(6): 610–21. Available from:
    1. Kurth AE, Celum C, BaetenSten JM, Vermund H, Wasserheit JN Combination HIV Prevention: Significance, Challenges, and Opportunities. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. [Internet]. 2011. Mar [cited 2019 Apr 09]: 8(1): 62–72. Available from:
    1. Chang LW, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ, Gray RH, and Reynolds SJ Combination implementation for HIV prevention: moving from clinical trial evidence to population-level effects. Lancet Infect Dis. [Internet]. 2013. Jan [cited 2019 Apr 09]:13(1):65–76. Available from: doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70273-6
    1. AVERT. Global information and education on HIV and AIDS. [Internet]. United Kingdom. AVERT; 2017. [updated 2017 Aug 30; cited 2019 Apr 9]. Available from:
    1. Hosek S, Celum C, Wilson CM, Kapogiannis B, Delany-Moretlwe S. Bekker LG. Preventing HIV among adolescents with oral PrEP: observations and challenges in the United States and South Africa. Journal of the Int AIDS Soc. [Internet]. 2016. Oct [cited 2019 Apr 09] 19:21107. Available from: doi:10.7448/IAS.19.7.21107
    1. Holly J, Lawrence C, Ramjee Gita, Carpp LN, Lombard C, Cohen MS et al. Weighing the Evidence of Efficacy of Oral PrEP for HIV Prevention in Women in Southern Africa. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. [Internet]. 2018. Aug [cited 2019 Apr 09] 34(8): 645–646. Available from: 10.1089/aid.2018.0031
    1. Thomson KA, Baeten JM, Mugo NR, Bekker LG, Celum CL, Heffron R. Tenofovir-based oral preexposure prophylaxis prevents HIV infection among women. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. [Internet]. 2016. Jan [cited 2019 Apr 09] 11(1):18–26. Available from: doi:10.1097/COH.0000000000000207
    1. CDC. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. [Internet]. Atlanta. CDC; 2019. [updated 2019 Apr 10; cited 2019 Apr 9]. Available from:
    1. Fonner VA, Dalglish SL, Kennedy CE, Baggaley R, O’Reilly KR, Koechlin FM, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis for all populations. AIDS. [Internet]. 2016. Jul [cited 2019 Apr 09]; 31; 30(12): 1973–83. Available from:
    1. Machado D, de Sant’Anna Carvalho A, Riera R. Adolescent pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: current perspectives. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics. 2017; Volume 8:137–148.
    1. Johnson LF, Chiu C, Myer L, Davies MA, Dorrington RE, Bekker LG, et al. Prospects for HIV control in South Africa: a model-based analysis. Glob Health Action. [Internet]. 2016. Jun [cited 2019 Apr 09]; 9(1): Available from:
    1. Maljaars L, Gill K, Smith P, Gray G, Dietrich J, Gomez G et al. Condom migration after introduction of pre-exposure prophylaxis among HIV-uninfected adolescents in South Africa: A cohort analysis. Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine. 2017; 18(1).
    1. Pettifor A, Stoner M, Pike C, Bekker L. Adolescent lives matter. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2018; 13(3):265–273.
    1. Castillo-Mancilla JR, Zheng JH, Rower JE, et al. Tenofovir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir diphosphate in dried blood spots for determining recent and cumulative drug exposure. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2013; 29:384–90.
    1. Anderson P, Liu A, Castill-Mancilla J, et al. TFV-DP in Dried Blood Spots (DBS) Following Directly Observed Therapy: DOT-DBS Study. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI). Seattle, WA USA, 2017
    1. Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan V, et al. Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14:820–9.
    1. Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, et al. Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4:151ra25.
    1. Phillips T, Sinxadi P, Abrams, et al. Comparison of Plasma Efavirenz and Tenofovir, Dried Blood Spot Tenofovir-Diphosphate, and self-reported adherence to predict virologic suppression among South African women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019. Jul 1; 81(3):311–318. Doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002032. PubMed PMID: 30893125; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6565450
    1. Zanoni B, Archary M, Buchan S, Katz I, Haberer J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the adolescent HIV continuum of care in South Africa: The Cresting Wave. 2020. BMJ Global Health 2016; 1:e000004.
    1. Bekker L, Rebe K, Venter F, Maartens G, Moorhouse M, Conradie F et al. Southern African guidelines on the safe use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in persons at risk of acquiring HIV-1 infection. Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine. 2016; 17(1).
    1. Eakle R, Venter F, Rees H. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in an era of stalled HIV prevention: Can it change the game? Retrovirology. 2018; 15(1).
    1. Warren E, Paterson P, Schulz W, Lees S, Eakle R, Stadler J et al. Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13(6):e0198680.
    1. Bekker LG., Roux S, Sebastien E, Yola N, Amico KR, Hughes JP, et al. Daily and non-daily pre-exposure prophylaxis in African women (HPTN 067/ADAPT Cape Town Trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. [Internet]. 2017. Oct [cited 2019 Apr 16]; 5(2): Available from: DOI:10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30156-X
    1. Hosek S, Rudy B, Landovitz R, Kapogiannis B, Siberry G, Rutledge B et al. An HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Demonstration Project and Safety Study for Young MSM. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2017; 74(1):21–29.
    1. Machado D, de Sant’Anna Carvalho A, Riera R. Adolescent pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: current perspectives. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics. 2017; Volume 8:137–148.
    1. Gomez GB, Borquez A, Case KK, Wheelock A, Vassall A, Hankins C. The cost and impact of scaling up pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness modelling studies. [Internet]. 2013. Mar [cited 2019 Jun 10]; 10(3): Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001401
    1. Sarkar S, Corso P, Ebrahim-Zadeh S, Kim P, Charania S, Wall K . Cost-effectiveness of HIV Prevention Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. EClinicalMedicine. 2019; 10:10–31.
    1. B Holmes KK. Major Infectious Diseases. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent HIV Acquisition; 2017.
    1. Jamieson L, Gomez G, Rebe K et al. The impact of self-selection based on HIV risk on the cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis in South Africa. [Internet] AIDS: January 30, 2020. Available from doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002486

Source: PubMed

Подписаться