Impact of the Economic Downturn on Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in the United States: A National Trend Analysis, 2003 to 2013

David N Bernstein, David Brodell, Yue Li, Paul T Rubery, Addisu Mesfin, David N Bernstein, David Brodell, Yue Li, Paul T Rubery, Addisu Mesfin

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective database analysis.

Objective: The impact of the 2008-2009 economic downtown on elective lumbar spine surgery is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the effect of the economic downturn on the overall trends of elective lumbar spine surgery in the United States.

Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used in conjunction with US Census and macroeconomic data to determine historical trends. The economic downturn was defined as 2008 to 2009. Codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), were used in order to identify appropriate procedures. Confidence intervals were determined using subgroup analysis techniques.

Results: From 2003 to 2012, there was a 19.8% and 26.1% decrease in the number of lumbar discectomies and laminectomies, respectively. Over the same time period, there was a 56.4% increase in the number of lumbar spinal fusions. The trend of elective lumbar spine surgeries per 100 000 persons in the US population remained consistent from 2008 to 2009. The number of procedures decreased by 4.5% from 2010 to 2011, 7.6% from 2011 to 2012, and 3.1% from 2012 to 2013. The R2 value between the number of surgeries and the S&P 500 Index was statistically significant (P ≤ .05).

Conclusions: The economic downturn did not affect elective lumbar fusions, which increased in total from 2003 to 2013. The relationship between the S&P 500 Index and surgical trends suggests that during recessions, individuals may utilize other means, such as insurance, to cover procedural costs and reduce out-of-pocket expenditures, accounting for no impact of the economic downturn on surgical trends. These findings can assist multiple stakeholders in better understanding the interconnectedness of macroeconomics, policy, and elective lumbar spine surgery trends.

Keywords: Nationwide Inpatient Sample; economic recession; lumbar discectomy; lumbar laminectomy; lumbar spinal fusion; lumbar spine surgery; macroeconomic factors; national trends.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The incidence of elective lumbar spine surgery relative to the population saw no effect from the economic downturn from 2008 to 2009. A significant decrease in the trend occurred from 2010 to 2013. The years of the economic downturn are highlighted in light gray.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Lumbar discectomy and laminectomy showed a decreasing trend from 2003 to 2013. Lumbar spinal fusion showed an increasing trend over the same time frame. The economic downturn did not affect the rate of any of the 3 surgeries. The years of the economic downturn are highlighted in light gray.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The elective lumbar spine surgery trend continued upwards with a growth of 4.9% during the economic downturn from 2008 to 2009. The years of the economic downturn are highlighted in light gray.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The percentage of elective lumbar spine surgeries reimbursed by a private payer decreased over the study period from 2003 to 2013. The years of the economic downturn are highlighted in light gray.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The growth rate of persons age 65 years or older increased over the study years. In 2013, there was a 3.7% growth in persons age 65 years or older in the US population. The years of the economic downturn are highlighted in light gray.

References

    1. Davis H. Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979-1990. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19:1117–1124.
    1. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:1441–1445.
    1. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES. United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2707–2714.
    1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303:1259–1265.
    1. Ugiliweneza B, Kong M, Nosova K, et al. Spinal surgery: variations in health care costs and implications for episode-based bundled payments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:1235–1242.
    1. Rossi VJ, Ahn J, Bohl DD, Tabaraee E, Singh K. Economic factors in the future delivery of spinal healthcare. World J Orthop. 2015;6:409–412.
    1. Acosta FL, Jr, Ames C, Hsieh PC, McCarthy IM. Introduction: costs and benefits of modern-day spine care. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36:Introduction. doi:10.3171/2014.4.FOCUS14124.
    1. Borden WB, Chiang YP, Kronick R. Bringing patient-centered outcomes research to life. Value Health. 2015;18:355–357.
    1. Martin BI, Deyo RA, Lurie JD, Carey TS, Tosteson AN, Mirza SK. Effects of a commercial insurance policy restriction on lumbar fusion in North Carolina and the implications for national adoption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41:647–655.
    1. Jancuska JM, Hutzler L, Protopsaltis TS, Bendo JA, Bosco J. Utilization of lumbar spinal fusion in New York state: trends and disparities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:1508–1514.
    1. Stain SC, Hoyt DB, Hunter JG, Joyce G, Hiatt JR. American surgery and the Affordable Care Act. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:984–985.
    1. Hoyt DB, Schneidman DS. The American College of Surgeons: an enduring commitment to quality and patient care. Am J Surg. 2015;209:436–441.
    1. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:624–630.
    1. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. NIS database documentation. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; . Accessed June 1, 2015.
    1. US Census Bureau. Population estimates: intercensal estimates. . Accessed March 23, 2016.
    1. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. . Accessed March 23, 2016.
    1. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. National health expenditure data, historical. . Accessed March 23, 2016.
    1. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. GDP & personal income, national data. . Accessed March 23, 2016.
    1. Yahoo! Finance. S&P 500, Historical prices. . Accessed March 23, 2016.
    1. Du Bois M, Szpalski M, Donceel P. A decade’s experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000–2009. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2693–2703.
    1. Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B, Sandén B. Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons. Swespine: the Swedish spine register: The 2012 report. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:953–974.
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative: general information. . Accessed June 21, 2015.
    1. Froimson MI, Rana A, White RE, Jr, et al. Bundled payments for care improvement initiative: the next evolution of payment formulations: AAHKS Bundled Payment Task Force. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:157–165.
    1. US Department of Health & Human Services. Better, smarter, healthier: In historic announcement, HHS sets clear goals and timeline for shifting Medicare reimbursements from volume to value. . Accessed June 27, 2015.
    1. Kerr D, Zhao W, Lurie JD. What are long-term predictors of outcomes for lumbar disc herniation? A randomized and observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1920–1930.
    1. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Health reform implementation timeline. . Accessed July 14, 2015.
    1. Bekelis K, Missios S, Kakoulides G, Rahmani R, Simmons N. Selection of patients for ambulatory lumbar discectomy: results from four US states. Spine J. 2014;14:1944–1950.
    1. Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, et al. Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:1957–1963.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться