Long-Term Objective Physical Activity Measurements using a Wireless Accelerometer Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery

Kevin Phan, Ralph J Mobbs, Kevin Phan, Ralph J Mobbs

Abstract

We report on a case of a patient who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mi-TLIF) with objective physical activity measurements performed preoperatively and postoperatively at up to 12-months using wireless accelerometer technology. In the first postoperative month following surgery, the patient had reduced mobility, taking 2,397 steps over a distance of 1.8 km per day. However, the number of steps taken and distance travelled per day had returned to baseline levels by the second postoperative month. At one-year follow-up, the patient averaged 5,095 steps per day in the month over a distance of 3.8 km; this was a 60% improvement in both steps taken and distance travelled compared to the preoperative status. The use of wireless accelerometers is feasible in obtaining objective physical activity measurements before and after lumbar interbody fusion and may be applicable to other related spinal surgeries as well.

Keywords: Accelerometer; Fitbit; Fusion; Objective measurement; Physical activity; Transforaminal interbody fusion surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1. Postoperative outcome. (A) Incision profile.…
Fig. 1. Postoperative outcome. (A) Incision profile. (B) Standing X-rays at 3 months postoperative.
Fig. 2. Average steps per day at…
Fig. 2. Average steps per day at monthly follow-up.
Fig. 3. Average distance travelled per day…
Fig. 3. Average distance travelled per day at monthly follow-up.

References

    1. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1441–1445.
    1. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2707–2714.
    1. Pryce R, Johnson M, Goytan M, Passmore S, Berrington N, Kriellaars D. Relationship between ambulatory performance and self-rated disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1316–1323.
    1. Soegaard R, Christensen FB. Health economic evaluation in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic literature review anno 2005. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1165–1173.
    1. Iversen MD, Katz JN. Examination findings and self-reported walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1296–1306.
    1. Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang PF, Jeng JS, Hung C. How active are people with stroke?: use of accelerometers to assess physical activity. Stroke. 2009;40:163–168.
    1. Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Sports Med. 2001;31:91–100.
    1. Bassett DR, Jr, Cureton AL, Ainsworth BE. Measurement of daily walking distance-questionnaire versus pedometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:1018–1023.
    1. Mobbs RJ, Gollapudi PR, Chandran NK. Outcome following anterior cervical discectomy in compensation patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2001;8:124–125.
    1. Culhane KM, Lyons GM, Hilton D, Grace PA, Lyons D. Long-term mobility monitoring of older adults using accelerometers in a clinical environment. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:335–343.
    1. Dalton A, Khalil H, Busse M, Rosser A, van Deursen R, Olaighin G. Analysis of gait and balance through a single triaxial accelerometer in presymptomatic and symptomatic Huntington's disease. Gait Posture. 2013;37:49–54.
    1. Sumukadas D, Laidlaw S, Witham MD. Using the RT3 accelerometer to measure everyday activity in functionally impaired older people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008;20:15–18.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться