Online-Delivered Group and Personal Exercise Programs to Support Low Active Older Adults' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial

Mark R Beauchamp, Ryan M Hulteen, Geralyn R Ruissen, Yan Liu, Ryan E Rhodes, Colin M Wierts, Katrina J Waldhauser, Samantha H Harden, Eli Puterman, Mark R Beauchamp, Ryan M Hulteen, Geralyn R Ruissen, Yan Liu, Ryan E Rhodes, Colin M Wierts, Katrina J Waldhauser, Samantha H Harden, Eli Puterman

Abstract

Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, experts in mental health science emphasized the importance of developing and evaluating approaches to support and maintain the mental health of older adults.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether a group-based exercise program relative to a personal exercise program (both delivered online) and waitlist control (WLC) can improve the psychological health of previously low active older adults during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: The Seniors COVID-19 Pandemic and Exercise (SCOPE) trial was a 3-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial conducted between May and September 2020 in which low active older adults (aged ≥65 years) were recruited via media outlets and social media. After baseline assessments, consented participants were randomized to one of two 12-week exercise programs (delivered online by older adult instructors) or a WLC condition. A total of 241 older adults (n=187 women) provided baseline measures (via online questionnaires), were randomized (ngroup=80, npersonal=82, ncontrol=79), and completed measures every 2 weeks for the duration of the trial. The trial's primary outcome was psychological flourishing. Secondary outcomes included global measures of mental and physical health, life satisfaction, and depression symptoms.

Results: The results of latent growth modeling revealed no intervention effects for flourishing, life satisfaction, or depression symptoms (P>.05 for all). Participants in the group condition displayed improved mental health relative to WLC participants over the first 10 weeks (effect size [ES]=0.288-0.601), and although the week 12 effect (ES=0.375) was in the same direction the difference was not statistically significant (P=.089). Participants in the personal condition displayed improved mental health, when compared with WLC participants, in the same medium ES range (ES=0.293-0.565) over the first 8 weeks, and while the effects were of a similar magnitude at weeks 10 (ES=0.455, P=.069) and 12 (ES=0.258, P=.353), they were not statistically significant. In addition, participants in the group condition displayed improvements in physical health when compared with the WLC (ES=0.079-0.496) across all 12 weeks of the study following baseline. No differences were observed between the personal exercise condition and WLC for physical health (slope P=.271).

Conclusions: There were no intervention effects for the trial's primary outcome (ie, psychological flourishing). It is possible that the high levels of psychological flourishing at baseline may have limited the extent to which those indicators could continue to improve further through intervention (ie, potential ceiling effects). However, the intervention effects for mental and physical health point to the potential capacity of low-cost and scalable at-home programs to support the mental and physical health of previously inactive adults in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04412343; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04412343.

Keywords: COVID-19; mental health; physical activity; randomized trial.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Mark R Beauchamp, Ryan M Hulteen, Geralyn R Ruissen, Yan Liu, Ryan E Rhodes, Colin M Wierts, Katrina J Waldhauser, Samantha H Harden, Eli Puterman. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 30.07.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Program attendance in the two experimental conditions across the 12-week trial.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trajectories for mental health outcomes over the course of the trial.

References

    1. Jowell A, Carstensen LL, Barry M. A life-course model for healthier ageing: lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2020 Oct;1(1):e9–e10. doi: 10.1016/s2666-7568(20)30008-8.
    1. Holmes EA, O'Connor RC, Perry VH, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L, Ballard C, Christensen H, Cohen Silver R, Everall I, Ford T, John A, Kabir T, King K, Madan I, Michie S, Przybylski AK, Shafran R, Sweeney A, Worthman CM, Yardley L, Cowan K, Cope C, Hotopf M, Bullmore E. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547–560. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1.
    1. Banerjee D. The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on elderly mental health. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;35(12):1466–1467. doi: 10.1002/gps.5320.
    1. World Health Organization . #HealthyAtHome - Physical Activity. World Health Organization; [2021-06-21]. .
    1. Jacob L, Tully MA, Barnett Y, Lopez-Sanchez GF, Butler L, Schuch F, López-Bueno R, McDermott D, Firth J, Grabovac I, Yakkundi A, Armstrong N, Young T, Smith L. The relationship between physical activity and mental health in a sample of the UK public: A cross-sectional study during the implementation of COVID-19 social distancing measures. Ment Health Phys Act. 2020 Oct;19:100345. doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100345.
    1. Faulkner G, Rhodes RE, Vanderloo LM, Chulak-Bozer T, O'Reilly N, Ferguson L, Spence JC. Physical activity as a coping strategy for mental health due to the COVID-19 virus: a potential disconnect among Canadian adults? Front Commun. 2020 Sep 24;5:571833. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.571833.
    1. Callow DD, Arnold-Nedimala NA, Jordan LS, Pena GS, Won J, Woodard JL, Smith JC. The mental health benefits of physical activity in older adults survive the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;28(10):1046–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.06.024.
    1. Creese B, Khan Z, Henley W, O'Dwyer S, Corbett A, Vasconcelos Da Silva M, Mills K, Wright N, Testad I, Aarsland D, Ballard C. Loneliness, physical activity, and mental health during COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis of depression and anxiety in adults over the age of 50 between 2015 and 2020. Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 May;33(5):505–514. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220004135.
    1. Beauchamp MR, Liu Y, Dunlop WL, Ruissen GR, Schmader T, Harden SM, Wolf SA, Puterman E, Sheel AW, Rhodes RE. Psychological mediators of exercise adherence among older adults in a group-based randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2021 Mar;40(3):166–177. doi: 10.1037/hea0001060.
    1. Beauchamp MR, Ruissen GR, Dunlop WL, Estabrooks PA, Harden SM, Wolf SA, Liu Y, Schmader T, Puterman E, Sheel AW, Rhodes RE. Group-based physical activity for older adults (GOAL) randomized controlled trial: Exercise adherence outcomes. Health Psychol. 2018 May;37(5):451–461. doi: 10.1037/hea0000615.
    1. Ruissen GR, Liu Y, Schmader T, Lubans DR, Harden SM, Wolf SA, Rhodes RE, Dunlop WL, Puterman E, Zumbo BD, Beauchamp MR. Effects of group-based exercise on flourishing and stigma consciousness among older adults: Findings from a randomised controlled trial. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Jul;12(2):559–583. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12197.
    1. Burke S, Carron A, Eys M, Ntoumanis N, Estabrooks P. Group versus individual approach? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity. Sport Exerc Psychol Rev. 2006;2:19–35.
    1. Haslam C, Jetten J, Cruwys T, Dingle GA, Haslam SA. The New Psychology of Health: Unlocking the Social Cure. London, UK: Routledge; 2018.
    1. Turner JC. Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In: Lawler EJ, editor. Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research. Greenwich, UK: JAI Press; 1985. pp. 72–81.
    1. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell; 1987.
    1. Turner JC, Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, McGarty C. Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jul 02;20(5):454–463. doi: 10.1177/0146167294205002.
    1. Beauchamp MR, Rhodes RE. A group-mediated approach to precision medicine-social identification, prevention, and treatment. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 01;77(6):555–556. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0024.
    1. Steffens NK, LaRue CJ, Haslam C, Walter ZC, Cruwys T, Munt KA, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Tarrant M. Social identification-building interventions to improve health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;15(1):85–112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1669481.
    1. VanderWeele TJ, McNeely E, Koh HK. Reimagining health-flourishing. JAMA. 2019 May 07;321(17):1667–1668. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3035.
    1. VanderWeele TJ, Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Allin P, Farrelly C, Fletcher G, Frederick DE, Hall J, Helliwell JF, Kim ES, Lauinger WA, Lee MT, Lyubomirsky S, Margolis S, McNeely E, Messer N, Tay L, Viswanath V, Węziak-Białowolska D, Kubzansky LD. Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being. Prev Med. 2020 Mar 01;133:106004. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106004.
    1. Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R. New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res. 2009 May 28;97(2):143–156. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y.
    1. VanderWeele TJ. On the promotion of human flourishing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 01;114(31):8148–8156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702996114.
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.
    1. Beauchamp M, Hulteen R, Ruissen G, Liu Y, Rhodes R, Puterman E. The Seniors COvid-19 Pandemic and Exercise (SCOPE) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 2020. May 25, [2020-05-24]. .
    1. Kiernan M, Schoffman DE, Lee K, Brown SD, Fair JM, Perri MG, Haskell WL. The Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item (L-Cat): A single categorical item sensitive to physical activity changes in overweight/obese women. Int J Obes (Lond) 2013 Dec;37(12):1597–602. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.36.
    1. Toledo MJ, Hekler E, Hollingshead K, Epstein D, Buman M. Validation of a smartphone app for the assessment of sedentary and active behaviors. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 09;5(8):e119. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6974.
    1. Ross R, Chaput J, Giangregorio LM, Janssen I, Saunders TJ, Kho ME, Poitras VJ, Tomasone JR, El-Kotob R, McLaughlin EC, Duggan M, Carrier J, Carson V, Chastin SF, Latimer-Cheung AE, Chulak-Bozzer T, Faulkner G, Flood SM, Gazendam MK, Healy GN, Katzmarzyk PT, Kennedy W, Lane KN, Lorbergs A, Maclaren K, Marr S, Powell KE, Rhodes RE, Ross-White A, Welsh F, Willumsen J, Tremblay MS. Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for adults aged 18-64 years and adults aged 65 years or older: An integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Oct;45(10 (Suppl. 2)):S57–S102. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0467.
    1. Warburton D, Jamnik V, Bredin S, Gledhill N. The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) and Electronic Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (ePARmed-X+): Summary of consensus panel recommendations. Health Fit J Canada. 2011;4:3–23. doi: 10.14288/hfjc.v4i2.103.
    1. Government of British Columbia Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. 1996. [2020-06-20]. .
    1. Mageau GA, Vallerand RJ. The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model. J Sports Sci. 2003 Nov;21(11):883–904. doi: 10.1080/0264041031000140374.
    1. Beauchamp MR. Promoting exercise adherence through groups: A self-categorization theory perspective. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2019 Jan;47(1):54–61. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000177.
    1. Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):873–80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9.
    1. Fleeson W. The quality of American life at the end of the century. In: Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC, editors. How Healthy Are We?: A National Study of Well-Being at Midlife. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2004. pp. 252–272.
    1. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) Am J Prev Med. 1994;10(2):77–84.
    1. Charles ST, Almeida DM. Daily reports of symptoms and negative affect: Not all symptoms are the same. Psychol Health. 2007 Feb 01;21(1):1–17. doi: 10.1080/14768320500129239.
    1. Raudenbush SW, Spybrook J, Congdon R, Liu X, Martinez A, Bloom H, Hill C. Optimal Design Plus Empirical Evidence (Version 3.0) [Software] 2011. [2020-02-09]. .
    1. Research Randomizer. [2021-07-28].
    1. Beauchamp M, Hulteen R, Ruissen G, Liu Y, Rhodes R, Puterman E. The Seniors COvid-19 Pandemic and Exercise (SCOPE) study: A randomized controlled trial (SCOPE: Transparent-Changes) 2020. Jul 27, [2021-05-23]. .
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide (Sixth Edition) Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2007.
    1. Hu L, Bentler Pm. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(4):424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.
    1. Hu L, Bentler Pm. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999 Jan;6(1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
    1. Feingold A. Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychol Methods. 2009 Mar;14(1):43–53. doi: 10.1037/a0014699.
    1. Feingold A. A regression framework for effect size assessments in longitudinal modeling of group differences. Rev Gen Psychol. 2013 Mar;17(1):111–121. doi: 10.1037/a0030048.
    1. Feingold A. New approaches for estimation of effect sizes and their confidence intervals for treatment effects from randomized controlled trials. Quant Method Psychol. 2019;15(2):96–111. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.15.2.p096.
    1. McGinty EE, Presskreischer R, Han H, Barry CL. Psychological distress and loneliness reported by US adults in 2018 and April 2020. JAMA. 2020 Jul 07;324(1):93–94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9740.
    1. Xie B, Charness N, Fingerman K, Kaye J, Kim MT, Khurshid A. When going digital becomes a necessity: Ensuring older adults’ needs for information, services, and social inclusion during COVID-19. J Aging Soc Policy. 2020;32(4-5):460–470. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1771237.
    1. Davidson J, Schimmele C. Evolving Internet Use Among Canadian Seniors. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2019. Jul 10, [2020-06-16]. .

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться