Computerized HIV preventive intervention for adolescents: indications of efficacy

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that a computerized intervention would be as efficacious as an in-person, small-group intervention in reducing sexual risk behaviors. The sexual behavior of high-risk adolescents in 3 intervention conditions was examined: (1) computer based, (2) small groups, and (3) control. Adolescents in the computerized intervention were significantly less likely to engage in sexual activity and reported significantly fewer partners. For some youths, computers are a viable way to deliver prevention information and promote skill development.

Figures

FIGURE 1—

Sexual behavior outcomes: baseline and follow-up comparisons of (a) percentage of students who had sexual intercourse, (b) percentage of the students who had unprotected sexual intercourse, and (c) number of sexual partners. aSmall group vs computer group difference. bComputer group vs control group difference. cSmall group vs control group difference.

FIGURE 1—

Sexual behavior outcomes: baseline and follow-up comparisons of (a) percentage of students who had sexual intercourse, (b) percentage of the students who had unprotected sexual intercourse, and (c) number of sexual partners. aSmall group vs computer group difference. bComputer group vs control group difference. cSmall group vs control group difference.

FIGURE 1—

Sexual behavior outcomes: baseline and follow-up comparisons of (a) percentage of students who had sexual intercourse, (b) percentage of the students who had unprotected sexual intercourse, and (c) number of sexual partners. aSmall group vs computer group difference. bComputer group vs control group difference. cSmall group vs control group difference.