Effect of EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation with bilateral arm training on hemiplegic shoulder pain and arm function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Li-Ling Chuang, You-Lin Chen, Chih-Chung Chen, Yen-Chen Li, Alice May-Kuen Wong, An-Lun Hsu, Ya-Ju Chang, Li-Ling Chuang, You-Lin Chen, Chih-Chung Chen, Yen-Chen Li, Alice May-Kuen Wong, An-Lun Hsu, Ya-Ju Chang

Abstract

Background: Hemiplegic shoulder pain is a frequent complication after stroke, leading to limited use of the affected arm. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are two widely used interventions to reduce pain, but the comparative efficacy of these two modalities remains uncertain. The purpose of this research was to compare the immediate and retained effects of EMG-triggered NMES and TENS, both in combination with bilateral arm training, on hemiplegic shoulder pain and arm function of stroke patients.

Methods: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at two medical centers. Thirty-eight patients (25 males and 13 females, 60.75 ± 10.84 years old, post stroke duration 32.68 ± 53.07 months) who had experienced a stroke more than 3 months ago at the time of recruitment and hemiplegic shoulder pain were randomized to EMG-triggered NMES or TENS. Both groups received electrical stimulation followed by bilateral arm training 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measures included a vertical Numerical Rating Scale supplemented with a Faces Rating Scale, and the short form of the Brief Pain Inventory. The secondary outcome measures were the upper-limb subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and pain-free passive shoulder range of motion. All outcomes were measured pretreatment, post-treatment, and at 1-month after post-treatment. Two-way mixed repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine treatment effects.

Results: Compared to TENS with bilateral arm training, the EMG-triggered NMES with bilateral arm training was associated with lower pain intensity during active and passive shoulder movement (P =0.007, P =0.008), lower worst pain intensity (P = 0.003), and greater pain-free passive shoulder abduction (P =0.001) and internal rotation (P =0.004) at follow-up. Both groups improved in pain at rest (P =0.02), pain interference with daily activities, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and pain-free passive shoulder flexion and external rotation post-treatment (P < 0.001) and maintained the improvement at follow-up (P < 0.001), except for resting pain (P =0.08).

Conclusions: EMG-triggered NMES with bilateral arm training exhibited greater immediate and retained effects than TENS with bilateral arm training with respect to pain and shoulder impairment for chronic and subacute stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain.

Trial registration: NCT01913509 .

Keywords: Electric stimulation therapy; Shoulder pain; Stroke rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Chang Gung Medical Foundation (103-7272B) and Mackay Memorial Hospital (15MMHIS063). All participants provided written informed consent and were informed of the study’s purpose, the process, and their right to withdraw from the study at any time.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of participants who enrolled in and completed the study. Abbreviations: NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; TENS, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; BAT, bilateral arm training
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
NRS-FRS scores during (a) shoulder active range of motion and (b) shoulder passive range of motion. * P < 0.05 between groups as indicated
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
BPI question 3 scores. *P < 0.05 between groups as indicated

References

    1. Lindgren I, Jonsson AC, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Shoulder pain after stroke: a prospective population-based study. Stroke. 2007;38:343–348. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254598.16739.4e.
    1. Sheffler LR, Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35:562–590. doi: 10.1002/mus.20758.
    1. Viana R, Pereira S, Mehta S, Miller T, Teasell R. Evidence for therapeutic interventions for hemiplegic shoulder pain during the chronic stage of stroke: a review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19:514–522. doi: 10.1310/tsr1906-514.
    1. Snels IA, Dekker JH, van der Lee JH, Lankhorst GJ, Beckerman H, Bouter LM. Treating patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:150–160. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200202000-00013.
    1. Lakse E, Gunduz B, Erhan B, Celik EC. The effect of local injections in hemiplegic shoulder pain: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88:805–811. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b71c65.
    1. de Kroon JR, Ijzerman MJ, Chae J, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:65–74. doi: 10.1080/16501970410024190.
    1. Chae J, Sheffler L, Knutson J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:412–426. doi: 10.1310/tsr1505-412.
    1. Price CI, Pandyan AD. Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic Cochrane review. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:5–19. doi: 10.1191/026921501670667822.
    1. Doucet BM, Lam A, Griffin L. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle function. Yale J Biol Med. 2012;85:201–215.
    1. IJzerman MJ, Renzenbrink GJ, Geurts AC. Neuromuscular stimulation after stroke: from technology to clinical deployment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9:541–552. doi: 10.1586/ern.09.6.
    1. Baker LL, Parker K. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the muscles surrounding the shoulder. Phys Ther. 1986;66:1930–1937. doi: 10.1093/ptj/66.12.1930.
    1. Chantraine A, Baribeault A, Uebelhart D, Gremion G. Shoulder pain and dysfunction in hemiplegia: effects of functional electrical stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:328–331. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90146-6.
    1. Church C, Price C, Pandyan AD, Huntley S, Curless R, Rodgers H. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the shoulder after acute stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:2995–3001. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000248969.78880.82.
    1. Kobayashi H, Onishi H, Ihashi K, Yagi R, Handa Y. Reduction in subluxation and improved muscle function of the hemiplegic shoulder joint after therapeutic electrical stimulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999;9:327–336. doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(99)00008-5.
    1. Koyuncu E, Nakipoglu-Yuzer GF, Dogan A, Ozgirgin N. The effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation for the treatment of shoulder subluxation and shoulder pain in hemiplegic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:560–566. doi: 10.3109/09638280903183811.
    1. Linn SL, Granat MH, Lees KR. Prevention of shoulder subluxation after stroke with electrical stimulation. Stroke. 1999;30:963–968. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.5.963.
    1. Wang RY, Yang YR, Tsai MW, Wang WT, Chan RC. Effects of functional electric stimulation on upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion in hemiplegic patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:283–290. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200204000-00007.
    1. Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Bors JG, Ho C, Akuthota P. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:73–79.
    1. Kalichman L, Ratmansky M. Underlying pathology and associated factors of hemiplegic shoulder pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90:768–780. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214e976.
    1. Ratnasabapathy Y, Broad J, Baskett J, Pledger M, Marshall J, Bonita R. Shoulder pain in people with a stroke: a population-based study. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:304–311. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr612oa.
    1. Mangold S, Schuster C, Keller T, Zimmermann-Schlatter A, Ettlin T. Motor training of upper extremity with functional electrical stimulation in early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:184–190. doi: 10.1177/1545968308324548.
    1. Chan MK, Tong RK, Chung KY. Bilateral upper limb training with functional electric stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:357–365. doi: 10.1177/1545968308326428.
    1. Cauraugh JH, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke. 2002;33:1589–1594. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000016926.77114.A6.
    1. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB, Duley A. Coupled bilateral movements and active neuromuscular stimulation: intralimb transfer evidence during bimanual aiming. Neurosci Lett. 2005;382:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.02.060.
    1. Basmajian JV, Bazant FJ. Factors preventing downward dislocation of the adducted shoulder joint. An electromyographic and morphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:1182–1186. doi: 10.2106/00004623-195941070-00002.
    1. Paci M, Nannetti L, Rinaldi LA. Glenohumeral subluxation in hemiplegia: an overview. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:557–568. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2004.08.0112.
    1. Delagi EF, Perotto AO, Iazzetti J, Morrison D. Shoulder joint. In: Perotto AO, Springfield IL, Thomas CC, editors. Anatomical guide for the Electromyographer: the limbs and trunk. Fifth. 2011. pp. 117–137.
    1. Aras MD, Gokkaya NK, Comert D, Kaya A, Cakci A. Shoulder pain in hemiplegia: results from a national rehabilitation hospital in Turkey. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:713–719. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000138739.18844.88.
    1. Murie-Fernandez M, Carmona Iragui M, Gnanakumar V, Meyer M, Foley N, Teasell R. Painful hemiplegic shoulder in stroke patients: causes and management. Neurologia. 2012;27:234–244. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2011.02.010.
    1. Chuang LL, CY W, Lin KC, Hsieh CJ. Relative and absolute reliability of a vertical numerical pain rating scale supplemented with a faces pain scale after stroke. Phys Ther. 2014;94:129–138. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120422.
    1. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994;23:129–138.
    1. Ger LP, Ho ST, Sun WZ, Wang MS, Cleeland CS. Validation of the brief pain inventory in a Taiwanese population. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1999;18:316–322. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00087-1.
    1. Wang XS, Mendoza TR, Gao SZ, Cleeland CS. The Chinese version of the brief pain inventory (BPI-C): its development and use in a study of cancer pain. Pain. 1996;67:407–416. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03147-8.
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
    1. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1606–1610. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606.
    1. Bohannon RW, Larkin PA, Smith MB, Horton MG. Shoulder pain in hemiplegia: statistical relationship with five variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:514–516.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
    1. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW. Shoulder subluxation and pain in stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;44:507–509.
    1. Price CI, Curless RH, Rodgers H. Can stroke patients use visual analogue scales? Stroke. 1999;30:1357–1361. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1357.
    1. Wilson RD, Gunzler DD, Bennett ME, Chae J. Peripheral nerve stimulation compared with usual care for pain relief of hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93:17–28. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000011.
    1. Chae J, DT Y, Walker ME, Kirsteins A, Elovic EP, Flanagan SR, Harvey RL, Zorowitz RD, Frost FS, Grill JH, Fang ZP. Intramuscular electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a 12-month follow-up of a multiple-center, randomized clinical trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:832–842. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000184154.01880.72.
    1. Lin KC, Chen YA, Chen CL, CY W, Chang YF. The effects of bilateral arm training on motor control and functional performance in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:42–51. doi: 10.1177/1545968309345268.
    1. Stoykov ME, Corcos DM. A review of bilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis. Occup Ther Int. 2009;16:190–203. doi: 10.1002/oti.277.
    1. Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92:791–798. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110009.
    1. Wu FC, Lin YT, Kuo TS, Luh JJ, Lai JS. Clinical effects of combined bilateral arm training with functional electrical stimulation in patients with stroke. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975367.
    1. Lin KC, Chang YF, CY W, Chen YA. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:441–448. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328719.
    1. McCombe Waller S, Forrester L, Villagra F, Whitall J. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation with unilateral dominant, unilateral nondominant and bilateral movement tasks in left- and right-handed adults. J Neurol Sci. 2008;269:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.033.
    1. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB. Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation. J Neurol Sci. 2003;215:13–19. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(03)00169-2.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться