Sex steroid hormones, bone mineral density, and risk of breast cancer

L H Kuller, J A Cauley, L Lucas, S Cummings, W S Browner, L H Kuller, J A Cauley, L Lucas, S Cummings, W S Browner

Abstract

Increased bone mineral density (BMD), as a marker of higher integrated estrogen exposure over time, could be an important risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer. In the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures 8065 non-black women age 65 years and older were followed for an average of 3.2 years. There were 121 incident breast cancer cases. The age adjusted incidence rate/1000 person years of breast cancer was substantially higher among women with high BMD at several measured bone sites. There was approximately a 2-fold higher risk of breast cancer for women in the upper as compared to the lower 25th percentile of BMD. Considerable controversy exists about the association of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and increased risk of breast cancer. In this paper we modeled the effects of selection for HRT, presuming that women with lower BMD would be more likely to be on HRT, then estimated the observed versus potential risk of breast cancer among HRT users as compared to nonusers. The model suggests that the potential risk of breast cancer associated with HRT could be greatly underestimated and that postmenopausal women with high BMD who are placed on HRT could have a substantially increased risk of breast cancer. This model of increased risk of breast cancer associated with BMD and HRT needs to be evaluated within clinical trials and larger observational studies that include measures of BMD.

References

    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987 Oct;65(4):697-702
    1. Cancer Causes Control. 1994 Nov;5(6):523-8
    1. Cancer Invest. 1988;6(3):245-54
    1. Fertil Steril. 1989 Nov;52(5):703-25
    1. JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):665-8
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(1):188-95
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Aug;8(8):901-8
    1. Br J Pharmacol. 1993 Oct;110(2):507-17
    1. J Intern Med. 1993 Dec;234(6):535-42
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):686-92
    1. Cancer Causes Control. 1994 Mar;5(2):167-76
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 May 15;139(10):1035-46
    1. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(3):307-11
    1. Cancer. 1994 Jul 15;74(2):632-9
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2349-55
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1994;(16):139-47
    1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Sep;3(6):511-4
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1990 Aug;70(4):739-52
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Nov;163(5 Pt 1):1438-44
    1. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1990;201:3-23
    1. Arteriosclerosis. 1990 Nov-Dec;10(6):1058-66
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Jan;133(1):50-7
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Jan;151(1):97-102
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Oct 16;83(20):1450-9
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Dec 15;117(12):1016-37
    1. Br Med Bull. 1992 Apr;48(2):345-55
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(1):17-35
    1. Ann Clin Biochem. 1994 Nov;31 ( Pt 6):509-28
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Feb 1;87(3):190-7
    1. Cancer Res. 1995 Sep 1;55(17):3757-8
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Sep 6;87(17):1297-302
    1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Jul-Aug;4(5):567-71
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Dec;57(6):1457-62
    1. Circulation. 1996 Jan 1;93(1):10-7
    1. Public Health Rev. 1995;23(2):157-213
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Mar 6;88(5):284-90
    1. Int J Cancer. 1996 Jul 29;67(3):327-32
    1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Jul;5(7):533-9
    1. Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Jul;6(4):314-23
    1. JAMA. 1996 Nov 6;276(17):1404-8
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974 Dec;39(6):1020-4
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;464:126-37
    1. Cancer Surv. 1986;5(3):573-83
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jan;85(1):6-10
    1. Science. 1988 Jul 1;241(4861):84-6

Source: PubMed

Подписаться