A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetics between two tablets of fixed-dose combination formulation with raloxifene and cholecalciferol and concomitant administration of each agents in healthy male volunteers

Hae Won Lee, Woo Youl Kang, Mi-Ri Gwon, Eun Jung Choi, Eun Hee Kim, Kyunghee Cho, Bakhwan Lee, Sook Jin Seong, Young-Ran Yoon, Hae Won Lee, Woo Youl Kang, Mi-Ri Gwon, Eun Jung Choi, Eun Hee Kim, Kyunghee Cho, Bakhwan Lee, Sook Jin Seong, Young-Ran Yoon

Abstract

A new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of raloxifene 60 mg and cholecalciferol 800 IU was developed to improve the medication compliance and overall efficacy of raloxifene treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics between two tablets of FDC formulation of raloxifene/cholecalciferol and the two products administered concomitantly at respective doses. This randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study included 46 volunteers. During each treatment period, subjects received the test formulation (FDC formulation containing raloxifene and cholecalciferol) or the reference formulation (co-administration of raloxifene and cholecalciferol), with a 14-d washout period. Serial blood samples were collected periodically over 96 hours after drug intake. In total, 46 subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and its 90% confidence intervals of the FDC to the single agents for the area under the concentration-time curve from zero to the last quantifiable time point and the maximum plasma concentration met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence: 1.1364 (1.0584-1.2201) and 1.1010 (0.9945-1.2188) for raloxifene and 1.0266 (0.9591-1.0989) and 1.0354 (0.9816-1.0921) for baseline-corrected cholecalciferol, respectively. Both formulations were well tolerated. No significant differences was observed in the incidence of adverse events between the two treatments. It was concluded that two tablets of the newly developed FDC formulation of raloxifene and cholecalciferol and the corresponding two agents administered concomitantly at respective doses were bioequivalent.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03010267.

Keywords: Cholecalciferol; Osteoporosis; Pharmacokinetics; Raloxifene.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: B. L. is an employee of Alvogen Korea Co. Ltd. The authors have indicated that they have no other conflicts of interest regarding the content of this article. The sponsor did not participate in the execution of the study or analysis of the data.

Copyright © 2022 Translational and Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1. Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of…
Figure 1. Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of raloxifene and cholecalciferol after administering a single oral dose of raloxifene 120 mg and cholecalciferol 1,600 IU as fixed dose combination or individual agents concomitantly. (A) Raloxifene (semilog scale); (B) Cholecalciferol, baseline-corrected (semilog scale). Error bars denote the standard deviations.

References

    1. Tu KN, Lie JD, Wan CKV, Cameron M, Austel AG, Nguyen JK, et al. Osteoporosis: a review of treatment options. P&T. 2018;43:92–104.
    1. Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393:364–376.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Evista® (raloxifene hydrochloride) prescribing information [Internet] [Accessed May 2, 2022]. .
    1. Avioli LV. SERM drugs for the prevention of osteoporosis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1999;10:317–319.
    1. Ye JY, Chen ZY, Huang CL, Huang B, Zheng YR, Zhang YF, et al. A non-lipolysis nanoemulsion improved oral bioavailability by reducing the first-pass metabolism of raloxifene, and related absorption mechanisms being studied. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:6503–6518.
    1. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Black DM, Downs RW, Jr, Sarkar S, Fuerst T, et al. Effect of raloxifene on the risk of new vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis: a reanalysis of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation trial. Bone. 2003;33:293–300.
    1. Naylor KE, Jacques RM, Peel NF, Gossiel F, Eastell R. Response of bone turnover markers to raloxifene treatment in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:2585–2592.
    1. DeLuca HF. Vitamin D: historical overview. Vitam Horm. 2016;100:1–20.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Hectorol® (doxercalciferol capsules) prescribing information [Internet] [Accessed May 24, 2022]. .
    1. Denker AE, Lazarus N, Porras A, Ramakrishnan R, Constanzer M, Scott BB, et al. Bioavailability of alendronate and vitamin D(3) in an alendronate/vitamin D(3) combination tablet. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51:1439–1448.
    1. Karczmarewicz E, Czekuć-Kryśkiewicz E, Płudowski P. Effect of vitamin D status on pharmacological treatment efficiency: impact on cost-effective management in medicine. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5:1–6.
    1. Deane A, Constancio L, Fogelman I, Hampson G. The impact of vitamin D status on changes in bone mineral density during treatment with bisphosphonates and after discontinuation following long-term use in post-menopausal osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:3.
    1. Kulkarni J, Gavrilidis E, Gwini SM, Worsley R, Grigg J, Warren A, et al. Effect of adjunctive raloxifene therapy on severity of refractory schizophrenia in women: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:947–954.
    1. Morii H, Ohashi Y, Taketani Y, Fukunaga M, Nakamura T, Itabashi A, et al. Effect of raloxifene on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:793–800.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FOSAMAX® PLUS D (alendronate sodium/cholecalciferol) prescribing information [Internet] [Accessed June 7, 2022]. .
    1. Lee HW, Kang WY, Jung W, Gwon MR, Cho K, Lee B, et al. Pharmacokinetic drug interaction between raloxifene and cholecalciferol in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2022;11:623–631.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: bioavailability and bioequivalence studies submitted in NDAs or INDs – General Considerations [Internet] [Accessed June 7, 2022]. .
    1. Guideline on. Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products. (No. 2020-91): Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) [in Korean] [Internet] [Accessed June 7, 2022]. .
    1. Mitra A, Wu Y. Challenges and opportunities in achieving bioequivalence for fixed-dose combination products. AAPS J. 2012;14:646–655.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться