Efficiency of a pneumatic device in controlling cuff pressure of polyurethane-cuffed tracheal tubes: a randomized controlled study

Emmanuelle Jaillette, Farid Zerimech, Julien De Jonckheere, Demosthenes Makris, Malika Balduyck, Alain Durocher, Alain Duhamel, Saad Nseir, Emmanuelle Jaillette, Farid Zerimech, Julien De Jonckheere, Demosthenes Makris, Malika Balduyck, Alain Durocher, Alain Duhamel, Saad Nseir

Abstract

Background: The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of a pneumatic device in controlling cuff pressure (Pcuff) in patients intubated with polyurethane-cuffed tracheal tubes. Secondary objectives were to determine the impact of continuous control of Pcuff, and cuff shape on microaspiration of gastric contents.

Methods: Prospective randomized controlled study. All patients requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation ≥48 h were eligible. The first 32 patients were intubated with tapered polyurethane-cuffed, and the 32 following patients were intubated with cylindrical polyurethane-cuffed tracheal tubes. Patients randomly received 24 h of continuous control of Pcuff using a pneumatic device (Nosten®), and 24 h of routine care of Pcuff using a manometer. Target Pcuff was 25 cmH2O. Pcuff was continuously recorded, and pepsin was quantitatively measured in all tracheal aspirates during these periods.

Results: The pneumatic device was efficient in controlling Pcuff (med [IQ] 26 [24, 28] vs 22 [20, 28] cmH2O, during continuous control of Pcuff and routine care, respectively; p = 0.017). In addition, percentage of patients with underinflation (31% vs 68%) or overinflation (53% vs 100%) of tracheal cuff, and percentage of time spent with underinflation (0.9 [0, 17] vs 14% [4, 30]) or overinflation (0 [0, 2] vs 32% [9, 54]) were significantly (p < 0.001) reduced during continuous control of Pcuff compared with routine care.No significant difference was found in microaspiration of gastric content between continuous control of Pcuff compared with routine care, or between patients intubated with tapered compared with cylindrical polyurethane-cuffed tracheal tubes.

Conclusion: The pneumatic device was efficient in controlling Pcuff in critically ill patients intubated with polyurethane-cuffed tracheal tubes.

Trial registration: The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (NCT01351259).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart. Pcuff, cuff pressure; P1, period 1; P2, period 2.

References

    1. Nseir S, Zerimech F, Jaillette E, Artru F, Balduyck M. Microaspiration in intubated critically ill patients: diagnosis and prevention. Infect Disor Drug Target. 2011;13:413–423. doi: 10.2174/187152611796504827.
    1. Craven DE, Chroneou A, Zias N, Hjalmarson KI. Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: the impact of targeted antibiotic therapy on patient outcomes. Chest. 2009;13:521–528. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1617.
    1. Bouadma L, Wolff M, Lucet J-C. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and its prevention. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;13:395–404. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328355a835.
    1. Coppadoro A, Bittner E, Berra L. Novel preventive strategies for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care. 2012;13:210. doi: 10.1186/cc11225.
    1. Lucangelo U, Zin WA, Antonaglia V, Petrucci L, Viviani M, Buscema G, Borelli M, Berlot G. Effect of positive expiratory pressure and type of tracheal cuff on the incidence of aspiration in mechanically ventilated patients in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2008;13:409–413. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000297888.82492.31.
    1. Nseir S, Zerimech F, De Jonckheere J, Alves I, Balduyck M, Durocher A. Impact of polyurethane on variations in tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2010;13:1156–1163. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1892-7.
    1. Dullenkopf A, Gerber A, Weiss M. Fluid leakage past tracheal tube cuffs: evaluation of the new Microcuff endotracheal tube. Intensive Care Med. 2003;13:1849–1853. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1933-6.
    1. Lorente L, Lecuona M, Jiménez A, Mora ML, Sierra A. Influence of an endotracheal tube with polyurethane cuff and subglottic secretion drainage on pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;13:1079–1083. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200705-761OC.
    1. Poelaert J, Depuydt P, De Wolf A, Van de Velde S, Herck I, Blot S. Polyurethane cuffed endotracheal tubes to prevent early postoperative pneumonia after cardiac surgery: a pilot study. J Thor Cardiovascular Surg. 2008;13:771–776. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.052.
    1. Miller MA, Arndt JL, Konkle MA, Chenoweth CE, Iwashyna TJ, Flaherty KR, Hyzy RC. A polyurethane cuffed endotracheal tube is associated with decreased rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Crit Care. 2011;13:280–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.05.035.
    1. Madjdpour C, Mauch J, Dave MH, Spielmann N, Weiss M. Comparison of air-sealing characteristics of tapered- vs. cylindrical-shaped high-volume, low-pressure tube cuffs. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;13:230–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02542.x.
    1. Dave MH, Frotzler A, Spielmann N, Madjdpour C, Weiss M. Effect of tracheal tube cuff shape on fluid leakage across the cuff: an in vitro study. Brit J Anaesthesia. 2010;13:538–543. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq202.
    1. Zanella A, Scaravilli V, Isgrò S, Milan M, Cressoni M, Patroniti N, Fumagalli R, Pesenti A. Fluid leakage across tracheal tube cuff, effect of different cuff material, shape, and positive expiratory pressure: a bench-top study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;13:343–347. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2106-z.
    1. Young PJ, Rollinson M, Downward G, Henderson S. Leakage of fluid past the tracheal tube cuff in a benchtop model. Brit J Anaesthesia. 1997;13:557–562. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.557.
    1. Rello J, Soñora R, Jubert P, Artigas A, Rué M, Vallés J. Pneumonia in intubated patients: role of respiratory airway care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;13:111–115. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680665.
    1. Seegobin RD, van Hasselt GL. Endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study of effects of four large volume cuffs. Brit Med J. 1984;13:965–968. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6422.965.
    1. Nseir S, Brisson H, Marquette C-H, Chaud P, Di Pompeo C, Diarra M, Durocher A. Variations in endotracheal cuff pressure in intubated critically ill patients: prevalence and risk factors. Eur J Anaesthsiol. 2009;13:229–234. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283222b6e.
    1. Nseir S, Zerimech F, Fournier C, Lubret R, Ramon P, Durocher A, Balduyck M. Continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure and microaspiration of gastric contents in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;13:1041–1047. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0630OC.
    1. Chastre J, Bedock B, Clair B, Gehanno P, Lacaze T, Lesieur O, Picart-Jacq JY, Plaisance P, Ravussin P, Samain E. et al.Quel abord trachéal pour la ventilation mécanique des malades de réanimation? (à l’exclusion du nouveau né) Reanimation. 1998;13:438–442.
    1. Duguet A, D’Amico L, Biondi G, Prodanovic H, Gonzalez-Bermejo J, Similowski T. Control of tracheal cuff pressure: a pilot study using a pneumatic device. Intensive Care Med. 2007;13:128–132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0417-x.
    1. Nseir S, Duguet A, Copin M-C, De Jonckheere J, Zhang M, Similowski T, Marquette C-H. Continuous control of endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal wall damage: a randomized controlled animal study. Crit Care. 2007;13:R109. doi: 10.1186/cc6142.
    1. Guyton DC, Barlow MR, Besselievre TR. Influence of airway pressure on minimum occlusive endotracheal tube cuff pressure. Crit Care Med. 1997;13:91–94. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00018.
    1. Blanch PB. Laboratory evaluation of 4 brands of endotracheal tube cuff inflator. Respir Care. 2004;13:166–173.
    1. Valta P, Corbeil C, Chassé M, Braidy J, Milic-Emili J. Mean airway pressure as an index of mean alveolar pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;13:1825–1830. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.6.8665041.
    1. Sole ML, Su X, Talbert S, Penoyer DA, Kalita S, Jimenez E, Ludy JE, Bennett M. Evaluation of an intervention to maintain endotracheal tube cuff pressure within therapeutic range. Am J Crit Care. 2011;13:109–117. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2011661.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться