Bridging the Gap for Children With Compound Health Challenges: An Intervention Protocol

Irene Elgen, Torhild Heggestad, Rune Tronstad, Gottfried Greve, Irene Elgen, Torhild Heggestad, Rune Tronstad, Gottfried Greve

Abstract

Background: During the last decades, there is a major shift in the panorama of diseases in children and adolescents. More children are referred to the specialized health care services due to less specific symptoms and more complex health challenges. These children are particularly difficult to care for in a "single-disease" oriented system. Our objective was to develop an alternative and more holistic approach better tailored to the complex needs of these children. Method: The target patient population is children between 6 and 13 years with three or more referrals including both the pediatric department and the mental health services. Furthermore, to be included in the project, the child's actual complaints needed to be clinically considered as an unclear or compound condition in need of an alternative approach. This paper describes the process of developing an intervention where a complementary professional team meets the patient and his/her family altogether for 2.5 h. The consultation focus on clarifying the complex symptomatology and on problem solving. The bio-psycho-social model is applied, emphasizing the patient's story as told on the whiteboard. In the dynamic processes of development, piloting, evaluating, and adjusting the components, feed-back from the patients, their families, professional team members, and external team coaches is important. The professional teams include pediatricians, psychologists and physiotherapists. Achieving the transformation from a logistic oriented team where members act separately toward a real complementary team, seems to be a success factor. Discussion: Composing multi-disciplinary and complementary teams was an essential part of the re-designed intervention. Team interaction transforming the professionals from working as a logistic team to act as a complementary team, was one of the important requirements in the process. When re-designing the specialist health service, it is mandatory to anchor all changes among employees as well as the hospital leadership. In addition, it is important to include patient experiences in the process of improvement. Evaluation of long-term outcomes is needed to investigate possible benefits from the new intervention. Trial Registration: Transitioning Young Patients' Health Care Trajectories, NCT04652154. Registered December 3rd, 2020-Retrospectively registered, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04652154?term=NCT04652154&draw=2&rank=1.

Keywords: child; compound condition; health; health services; intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Elgen, Heggestad, Tronstad and Greve.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The process of developing and adjusting the clinical intervention.

References

    1. Suh E, Stratton KL, Leisenring WM, Nathan PC, Ford JS, Freyer DR, et al. . Late mortality and chronic health conditions in long-term survivors of early-adolescent and young adult cancers: a retrospective cohort analysis from the childhood cancer survivor study. Lancet Oncol. (2020) 21:421–35. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30800-9
    1. Myrhaug HT, Brurberg KG, Hov L, Markestad T. Survival and impairment of extremely premature infants: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2019;143(2). 10.1542/peds.2018-0933
    1. Warner A, Walters K, Lamahewa K, Buszewicz M. How do hospital doctors manage patients with medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative study of physicians. J R Soc Med. (2017) 110:65–72. 10.1177/0141076816686348
    1. Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T. Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. (2008) 359:262–73. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706475
    1. Ghaderi S, Engeland A, Gunnes MW, Moster D, Ruud E, Syse A, et al. . Educational attainment among long-term survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence: a Norwegian population-based cohort study. J Cancer Surviv. (2016) 10:87–95. 10.1007/s11764-015-0453-z
    1. Heggestad T, Greve G, Skilbrei B, Elgen I. Complex care pathways for children with multiple referrals demonstrated in a retrospective population-based study. Acta Paediatr. (2020) 109:2641–7. 10.1111/apa.15250
    1. Elgen IL R, Greve G, Grifftih S, Heggestad T. Interdisciplinary Approaches suggested for children with multiple hospital referrals presenting with non-specific conditions. Front Pediatr. (2021). 10.3389/fped.2021.656939
    1. WHO . Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014: Description of the Global Burden of NCDs, Their Risk Factors and Determinants. Geneva: World Health Organization; (2014).
    1. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. (2013) 3:e001570. 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570
    1. Lygre RB, Thuen VM, Gjestad R, Norekvål TM, Greve G, Mildestvedt T, et al. . How can we improve specialist health services for children with multi-referrals? Parent reported experience. BMC Health Serv Res. (2020) 20:786. 10.1186/s12913-020-05666-9
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. (2008) 337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    1. Barbetti J, Lee G. Medical emergency team: a review of the literature. Nurs Crit Care. (2008) 13:80–5. 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00258.x
    1. Kozlowska KS S, Helgeland H. Functional Somatic Symptoms in Children and Adolescents. Dallos AVR, editor: Palgrave Macmillan. (2013).
    1. Kozlowska K, English M, Savage B. Connecting body and mind: the first interview with somatising patients and their families. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. (2013) 18:224–45. 10.1177/1359104512447314
    1. Kimmes BATJ. ‘I'm not the problem!” externalizing children's “problem's' using play therapy and developmental considerations. Contemp Fam Ther. (2014) 36:135–47. 10.1007/s10591-013-9285-z
    1. Usher LGR. The whiteboard as a co-therapist: Narrative conversations in a generalist counselling setting. Int J Narrat Ther Community Work. (2011) 4:9–15.
    1. Yoon J. Including economic evaluations in implementation science. J Gen Intern Med. (2020) 35:985–7. 10.1007/s11606-020-05649-w
    1. Crosta Ahlforn K, Bojner Horwitz E, Osika W A. Swedish version of the consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure. Scand J Prim Health Care. (2017) 35:286–92. 10.1080/02813432.2017.1358853
    1. Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. (2004) 21:699–705. 10.1093/fampra/cmh621
    1. Bikker AP, Fitzpatrick B, Murphy D, Mercer SW. Measuring empathic, person-centred communication in primary care nurses: validity and reliability of the consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure. BMC Fam Pract. (2015) 16:149. 10.1186/s12875-015-0374-y
    1. Arigliani M, Castriotta L, Pusiol A, Titolo A, Petoello E, Brun Peressut A, et al. . Measuring empathy in pediatrics: validation of the Visual CARE measure. BMC Pediatr. (2018) 18:57. 10.1186/s12887-018-1050-x

Source: PubMed

Подписаться