Preventing falls in older multifocal glasses wearers by providing single-lens distance glasses: the protocol for the VISIBLE randomised controlled trial

Mark J Haran, Stephen R Lord, Ian D Cameron, Rebecca Q Ivers, Judy M Simpson, Bonsan B Lee, Mamta Porwal, Marcella M S Kwan, Connie Severino, Mark J Haran, Stephen R Lord, Ian D Cameron, Rebecca Q Ivers, Judy M Simpson, Bonsan B Lee, Mamta Porwal, Marcella M S Kwan, Connie Severino

Abstract

Background: Recent research has shown that wearing multifocal glasses increases the risk of trips and falls in older people. The aim of this study is to determine whether the provision of single-lens distance glasses to older multifocal glasses wearers, with recommendations for wearing them for walking and outdoor activities, can prevent falls. We will also measure the effect of the intervention on health status, lifestyle activities and fear of falling, as well as the extent of adherence to the program.

Methods/design: Approximately 580 older people who are regular wearers of multifocal glasses people will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to either an intervention group (provision of single lens glasses, with counselling and advice about appropriate use) or a control group (usual care). The primary outcome measure will be falls (measured with 13 monthly calendars). Secondary measures will be quality of life, falls efficacy, physical activity levels and adverse events.

Discussions: The study will determine the impact of providing single-lens glasses, with advice about appropriate use, on preventing falls in older regular wearers of multifocal glasses. This pragmatic intervention, if found to be effective, will guide practitioners with regard to recommending appropriate glasses for minimising the risk of falls in older people.

Trial registration: The protocol for this study was registered with the Clinical Trials.gov Protocol Registration System on June 7th 2006 (#350855).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00350389.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through the trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The distance contrast sensitivity tests. Panel A shows a participant (with his chin placed on a comfortable chinrest to prevent head movement) viewing the test plate through the lower (reading) segments of his glasses. Panel B shows the participant looking directly at the test stimulus through the upper (distance) segments of his glasses. Any difference in contrast vision between the two conditions is then shown to the participant as part of the counselling session.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Simulated view of street scene as viewed through single-lens distance (panel A) and bifocal glasses (panel B). The footpath misalignment (a commonly reported environmental factor involved in outdoor falls) is clearly seen in panel A, but blurred in panel B.

References

    1. Attebo K, Ivers RQ, Mitchell P. Refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1066–72. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90251-8.
    1. Donahue SP. Loss of accommodation and presbyopia. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS, editor. Ophthalmology. Mosby, London; 1999.
    1. Duke Elder S. The practice of refraction. Churchill, London; 1963.
    1. Tinetti ME. Clinical practice. Preventing falls in elderly persons. N Eng J Med. 2003;348:42–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp020719.
    1. Lord SR, Dayhew J, Howland A. Multifocal glasses impair edge contrast sensitivity and depth perception and increase the risk of falls in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1760–66. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50502.x.
    1. Johnson L, Buckley JG, Harley C, Elliott DB. Use of single-vision eyeglasses improves stepping precision and safety when elderly habitual multifocal wearers negotiate a raised surface. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:178–80.
    1. Johnson L, Buckley JG, Scally AJ, Elliott DB. Multifocal spectacles increase variability in toe clearance and risk of tripping in the elderly. Investigative OphthalmolVis Sci. 2007;48:1466–71. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0586.
    1. Connell BR, Wolf SL. Environmental and behavioral circumstances associated with falls at home among healthy elderly individuals. Atlanta FICSIT Group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:179–86. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90261-6.
    1. Davies JC, Kemp GJ, Stevens G, Frostick SP, Manning DP. Bifocal/varifocal spectacles, lighting and missed-step accidents. Safety Sci. 2001;38:211. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00002-9.
    1. Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: The 'get-up and go' test. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1986;67:387–9.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
    1. Verbaken JH, Johnston AW. Population norms for edge contrast sensitivity. Am J Opt and Physiol Optics. 1986;63:724–732.
    1. Kurrle SE, Cameron ID, Quine S. Predictors of adherence with the recommended use of hip protectors. J Gerontol. 2004;59:M958–61.
    1. Clark MS, Bond MJ. The Adelaide Activities Profile: A measure of the lifestyle activities of elderly people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 1995;7:174–84.
    1. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries:results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1171–8. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7.
    1. Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) Age Ageing. 2005;34:614–9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi196.
    1. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1974;53:740–5.
    1. Lord SR, Menz HB, Tiedemann A. A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Phys Ther. 2003;83:237–252.
    1. Csuka M, McCarty DJ. Simple method for measurement of lower extremity muscle strength. Am J Med. 1985;78:77–81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90465-6.
    1. Rosenstock I. The health belief model and preventive health behaviour. Health Education Monographs. 1978;2:354–386.
    1. Gibson MJ, Andres RO, Isaacs B, Radebaugh T, Worm-Petersen J. The prevention of falls in later life. Danish Medical Bulletin. 1987;34:1–24.
    1. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN, Tilyard MW, Buchner DM. Randomized controlled trial of a general practice programme of home based exercise to prevent falls in elderly women. BMJ. 1997;315:1065–69.
    1. Cumming RG, Thomas M, Szonyi G, Salkeld G, O'Neill E, Westbury C, Frampton G. Home visits by an occupational therapist for assessment and modification of environmental hazards: a randomized trial of falls prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:1397–1402.
    1. Glynn RJ, Buring JE. Ways of measuring rates of recurrent events. BMJ. 1996;312:364–6.
    1. SPSS for windows . Release 17. SPSS Inc, Chicago, Il; 2008.
    1. StataCorp . Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. Stata Corporation, College Station, TX; 2001.
    1. Lord SR, Sherrington C, Menz H, Close JCT. Falls in Older People: Risk factors and Strategies for Prevention. Second. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2007.
    1. Tinetti ME, Williams CS. Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. New Eng J Med. 1997;337:1279–1284. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710303371806.
    1. Kenny RA, Rubenstein LZ, Martin FR, Tinetti ME. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:664–672. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x.
    1. Tinetti ME. Where is the vision in fall prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:676–677. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49132.x.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться