Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie, Monique van Lettow, Austine Makwakwa, Ester C Kip, Sharon E Straus, Harry Kawonga, Jemila S Hamid, Gerald Lebovic, Kevin E Thorpe, Merrick Zwarenstein, Michael J Schull, Adrienne K Chan, Alexandra Martiniuk, Vanessa van Schoor, Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie, Monique van Lettow, Austine Makwakwa, Ester C Kip, Sharon E Straus, Harry Kawonga, Jemila S Hamid, Gerald Lebovic, Kevin E Thorpe, Merrick Zwarenstein, Michael J Schull, Adrienne K Chan, Alexandra Martiniuk, Vanessa van Schoor

Abstract

Background: With the global shortage of skilled health workers estimated at 7.2 million, outpatient tuberculosis (TB) care is commonly task-shifted to lay health workers (LHWs) in many low- and middle-income countries where the shortages are greatest. While shown to improve access to care and some health outcomes including TB treatment outcomes, lack of training and supervision limit the effectiveness of LHW programs. Our objective was to refine and evaluate an intervention designed to address common causes of non-adherence to TB treatment and LHW knowledge and skills training needs.

Methods: We employed a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Participants included 103 health centres (HCs) providing TB care in four districts in Malawi, randomized 1:1 stratified by district and HC funding (Ministry of Health, non-Ministry funded). At intervention HCs, a TB treatment adherence intervention was implemented using educational outreach, a point-of-care reminder tool, and a peer support network. Clusters in the control arm provided usual care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with successful TB treatment (i.e., cure or treatment completion). We used a generalized linear mixed model, with district as a fixed effect and HC as a random effect, to compare proportions of patients with treatment success, among the trial arms, with adjustment for baseline differences.

Results: We randomized 51 HCs to the intervention group and 52 HCs to the control group. Four intervention and six control HCs accrued no eligible patients, and 371 of 1169 patients had missing outcome, HC, or demographic data, which left 74 HCs and 798 patients for analysis. Randomization group was not related to missing outcome, however, district, age, and TB type were significantly related and included in the primary analysis model. Among the 1153 patients with HC and demographic data, 297/605 (49%) and 348/548 (64%) in the intervention and control arms, respectively, had treatment success. The intervention had no significant effect on treatment success (adjusted odds ratio 1.35 [95% confidence interval 0.93-1.98]).

Conclusion: We found no significant effect of the intervention on TB treatment outcomes with high variability in implementation quality, highlighting important challenges to both scale-up and sustainability.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02533089 . Registered August 20, 2015.

Keywords: Cluster randomized trial; Community health workers; Educational outreach; Lay health workers; Peer support network; Reminders; Tuberculosis.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Details of flow of clusters and individuals through trial. HC health centre, MOH Ministry of Health, PT peer trainer, TB tuberculosis

References

    1. Organization, W.H . Global Tuberculosis Report. 2019.
    1. Floyd K, Philippe G, Zumla A, Raviglione M. The global tuberculosis epidemic and progress in care prevention and research: an overview in year 3 of the end TB era. Lancent. Respir Med. 2018;6:299–314.
    1. Organization, W.H . Global health workforce shortage to reach 12.9 million in coming decades. 2013.
    1. Lewin S, M.B.S., Glenton C, Daniels K, Bosch-Capblanch X, van Wyk BE, Odgaard-Jensen J, Johansen M, Aja GN, Zwarenstein M, Scheel IB, Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010(3).
    1. Musa BM, et al. Systematic review and metanalysis on community based interventions in tuberculosis care in developing countries. Niger J Med. 2014;23(2):103–117.
    1. Glenton CC, Carlsen CJ, Swartz B, Lewin A, Noyes SJ, Rashidian A. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to impove access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013:10.
    1. Lewin S, D.J., Pond, P, Zwarenstein M, Aja GN, van Wyk BE, Bosch-Capblanch X, Patrick M., Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005(1).
    1. Organization, W.H Medical doctors—global health observatory data repository. 2019 [cited 2020; Available from: .
    1. Organization, W.H Nursing and midwifery personnel—global health observatory data repository. 2019 [cited 2020; Available from: .
    1. Vision W. Malawi's Community Health Workers. 2015.
    1. Ministry of Health, G.o.t.R.o.M . National Community Health Strategy 2017–2022. 2017.
    1. Kok MC, et al. Health surveillance assistants as intermediates between the community and health sector in Malawi: exploring how relationships influence performance. BMC Health Services Research. 2016;16(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1402-x.
    1. Ministry of Health, G.o.t.R.o.M., National Tuberculosis Control Programme: five-year strategic plan 2012–2016. 2012.
    1. Puchalski Ritchie LM, et al. Evaluation of lay health workers’ needs to effectively support anti-tuberculosis treatment adherence in Malawi. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(11):1492–1497. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0206.
    1. Puchalski Ritchie LM, et al. A knowledge translation intervention to improve tuberculosis care and outcomes in Malawi: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015;10:38. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0228-y.
    1. Puchalski Ritchie LM, et al. Lay Health Workers experience of a tailored knowledge translation intervention to improve job skills and knowledge: a qualitative study in Zomba district Malawi. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:54. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0580-x.
    1. Puchalski Ritchie LM, et al. The impact of a knowledge translation intervention employing educational outreach and a point-of-care reminder tool vs standard lay health worker training on tuberculosis treatment completion rates: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1563-2.
    1. Russell E, Boles VTM, Shawn M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health. 1999;89:9.
    1. Bergstrom, J.R. Moderating Usability Tests. 2013; Available from: .
    1. Hoffmann TC, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Bmj. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
    1. Organization, W.H . Definitions and Reporting Framework for Tuberculosis. 2013.
    1. Hemming K, Girling AJ, Sitch AJ, Marsh J, Lilford RJ. Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2011.
    1. Moineddin R, Matheson FI, Glazier RH. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2007;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-34.
    1. Wu S, Crespi CM, Wong WK. Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(5):869–880. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.004.
    1. Campbell MK, et al. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. Bmj. 2012;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661.
    1. Zwarenstein M, et al. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Bmj. 2008;337:a2390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2390.
    1. Bates D. Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, and Walker, Steve., Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Ime4. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015;67(1):1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
    1. Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, et al. When and How should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials—a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2017;17:162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1.
    1. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Straus SE, Kip E, Makwakwa A. Impact of peer-trainer leadership style on uptake of a peer led educational research intervention to improve tuberculosis care and outcomes in Malawi: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2020;20:513. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05386-0.
    1. Vaughan Kelsey K, Maryse C, Sophie W, Marjolein D. Costs and cost-effectiveness of community health workers: evidence from a literature review. Human Resources for Health. 2015;71:13.
    1. Okeyo ILA, Dowse R. An illustrated booklet for reinforcing community health worker knowledge of tuberculosis and facilitating patient counsellings 2018. 2018. p. 1.
    1. Siribie M, AI N-SJ, Afonne C, Balyeku A, Falade CO, Gansane Z, Jegede AS, Ojanduru L, Oshiname FO, Kabarungi V, Kyaligonza J, Sanou AK, Serme L, Castellani J, Singlovic J, Gomes M. Training community health workers to manage uncomplicated and severe malaria: experience from 3 rural malaria-endemic areas in sub-Saharan Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;15:63.
    1. Yu X, et al. Healthy people, healthy community: evaluation of a train-the-trainers programme for community health workers on water, sanitation and hygiene in rural Haiti. Health Education Journal. 2019;78(8):931–945. doi: 10.1177/0017896919853850.
    1. Gualy S, et al. Enabling community health worker recognition and referral of surgical diseases: pilot study results of a pictorial guide. World Journal of Surgery. 2019;43(12):2949–2958. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05173-x.
    1. Sullivan, T., Lee, Katherine J., Ryan, Philip, Salter, Amy B., Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2017. 17: p. 13436. Sullivan, T., White, Ian, R., Salter, Amy B., Ryan, Philip, Lee, Katherine J., Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials? Statistical methods in medical research, 2018. 27(9): p. 2610-2626.
    1. Groenwold RH, Moons K, Vandenbroucke GM, Jan P. Randomized trials with missing outcome data: how to analyze and what to report. CMAJ. 2014;186(15):1153–1157. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131353.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться