Reducing Wound Tension with Undermining or Imbrication-Do They Work?
Naveen M Krishnan, Benjamin J Brown, Steven P Davison, Neil Mauskar, Matthew Mino, Marion H Jordan, Jeffrey W Shupp, Naveen M Krishnan, Benjamin J Brown, Steven P Davison, Neil Mauskar, Matthew Mino, Marion H Jordan, Jeffrey W Shupp
Abstract
Background: For the noncolonized wound, achieving tension-free, primary wound closure is ideal. Some surgeons advocate imbrication of deeper tissues rather than undermining, posing that imbrication preserves more dermal perfusion while still reducing tension at the wound edge. We sought to determine which technique most reliably reduced wound tension while preserving dermal wound perfusion.
Methods: A total of 5 standardized, symmetrical pairs of full thickness wounds were created on Duroc swine. Wound tension was measured with a Tyrolean tensiometer before and after either method of closure, whereas a speckle contrast imager was used to assess dermal edge perfusion. Skin tension and dermal perfusion were evaluated for statistical significance via paired t tests and a multivariate analysis of variance.
Results: There was a significant reduction in wound tension with undermining and imbrication relative to the raw wound tension (5 and 5.9 vs 7.1 N; P < 0.05) yet no significant difference between methods of closure (P > 0.05). There was a significant reduction in dermal perfusion between unwounded skin and the imbricated wound (222 perfusion units [PU] vs 48 PU; P < 0.05) and between the unwounded skin and the undermined wound (205 vs 63 PU; P < 0.05).
Conclusions: We found no significant difference in wound tension between wound undermining or imbrication and a significant decrease in dermal perfusion after imbrication and undermining although the relative decrease in perfusion was greater with imbrication. Wound undermining reduces skin tension with greater relative dermal perfusion to the skin and should be selected over wound imbrication in standard primary wound closure.
Figures
References
- Millard DR., Jr . Principlization of Plastic Surgery. 1st ed 1986.
- Neligan PC. Plastic Surgery. (3rd ed) 2012;14–15(1):240–296.
- Thorne CH. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 7th ed. 2013. pp. 1–38.
- McGuire MF. Studies of the excisional wound: I. Biomechanical effects of undermining and wound orientation on closing tension and work. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:419–427.
- Cox KW, Larrabee W., Jr A study of skin flap advancement as a function of undermining. Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108:151–155.
- Clark JD, Baldwin RL, Bayne KA, et al. In: In: Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Grossblatt N, editor. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
- Travis TE, Mino MJ, Moffatt LT, et al. Biphasic presence of fibrocytes in a porcine hypertrophic scar model. J Burn Care Res. 2015;36:e125–e135.
- Lockwood TE. Fascial anchoring technique in medial thigh lifts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:299–304.
- Lockwood TE. Superficial fascial system (SFS) of the trunk and extremities: a new concept. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:1009–1018.
Source: PubMed