Video-based Learning Versus Traditional Method for Preclinical Course of Complete Denture Fabrication

Amir Fayaz, Azita Mazahery, Mohammad Hosseinzadeh, Samane Yazdanpanah, Amir Fayaz, Azita Mazahery, Mohammad Hosseinzadeh, Samane Yazdanpanah

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Advances in computer science and technology allow the instructors to use instructional multimedia programs to enhance the process of learning for dental students.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a new educational modality by using videotapes on the performance of dental students in preclinical course of complete denture fabrication.

Materials and method: This quasi-experimental study was performed on 54 junior dental students in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU). Twenty-five and 29 students were evaluated in two consecutive semesters as controls and cases, respectively for the same course. The two groups were matched in terms of "knowledge about complete denture fabrication" and "basic dental skills" using a written test and a practical exam, respectively. After the intervention, performance and clinical skills of students were assessed in 8 steps. Eventually, a post-test was carried out to find changes in knowledge and skills of students in this regard.

Results: In the two groups with the same baseline level of knowledge and skills, independent T-test showed that students in the test group had a significantly superior performance in primary impression taking (p= 0.001) and primary cast fabrication (p= 0.001). In terms of anterior teeth set up, students in the control group had a significantly better performance (p= 0.001).

Conclusion: Instructional videotapes can aid in teaching fabrication of complete denture and are as effective as the traditional teaching system.

Keywords: Complete Denture; Dental Education; Post-test; Pre-test; Video-based Learning.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparing the scores of test V between the two groups

References

    1. Vaughn L, Baker R. Teaching in the medical setting: balancing teaching styles, learning styles and teaching methods. Med Teach. 2001; 23: 610–612.
    1. Aly M, Elen J, Willems G. Instructional multimedia program versus standard lecture: a comparison of two methods for teaching the undergraduate orthodontic curriculum. Eur J Dent Educ. 2004; 8: 43–46.
    1. Schittek M, Mattheos N, Lyon HC, Attström R. Computer assisted learning. A review. Eur J Dent Educ. 2001; 5: 93–100.
    1. Nance ET, Lanning SK, Gunsolley JC. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions. J Dent Educ. 2009; 73: 972–979.
    1. Howerton WB, Enrique PR, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA. Interactive computer-assisted instruction vs. lecture format in dental education. J Dent Hyg. 2004; 78: 10.
    1. Bissell V, McKerlie RA, Kinane DF, McHugh S. Teaching periodontal pocket charting to dental students: a comparison of computer assisted learning and traditional tutorials. Br Dent J. 2003; 195: 333–336.
    1. Plasschaert AJ, Cailleteau JG, Verdonschot EH. The effect of a multimedia interactive tutorial on learning endodontic problem-solving. Eur J Dent Educ. 1997; 1: 66–69.
    1. Gupta B, White DA, Walmsley AD. The attitudes of undergraduate students and staff to the use of electronic learning. Br Dent J. 2004; 196: 487–492.
    1. Healy DG, Fleming FJ, Gilhooley D, Felle P, Wood AE, Gorey T, et al. Electronic learning can facilitate student performance in undergraduate surgical education: a prospective observational study. BMC Med Educ. 2005; 5: 23.
    1. Eynon R, Perryer G, Walmsley AD. Dental undergraduate expectations and opinions of Web-based courseware to supplement traditional teaching methods. Eur J Dent Educ. 2003; 7: 103–110.
    1. Aragon CE, Zibrowski EM. Does exposure to a procedural video enhance preclinical dental student performance in fixed prosthodontics? J Dent Educ. 2008; 72: 67–71.
    1. Silverdale N, Katz J. The impact of a distance learning death and dying course: an analysis of student self-reported changes. Nurse Educ Today. 2005; 25: 509–518.
    1. Teasdale TA, Shaikh M. Efficacy of a geriatric oral health CD as a learning tool. J Dent Educ. 2006; 70: 1366–1369.
    1. Stern DT, Mangrulkar RS, Gruppen LD, Lang AL, Grum CM, Judge RD. Using a multimedia tool to improve cardiac auscultation knowledge and skills. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16: 763–769.
    1. Gallagher JE, Dobrosielski Vergona KA, Wingard RG, Williams TM. Web-based vs. traditional classroom instruction in gerontology: a pilot study. J Dent Hyg. 2005; 79: 7.
    1. Ludlow JB, Platin E. A comparison of Web page and slide/tape for instruction in periapical and panoramic radiographic anatomy. J Dent Educ. 2000; 64: 269–275.
    1. Howerton WB Jr, Platin E, Ludlow J, Tyndall DA. The influence of computer-assisted instruction on acquiring early skills in intraoral radiography. J Dent Educ. 2002; 66: 1154–1158.
    1. Abutarbush SM, Naylor JM, Parchoma G, D Eon M, Petrie L, Carruthers T. Evaluation of traditional instruction versus a self-learning computer module in teaching veterinary students how to pass a nasogastric tube in the horse. J Vet Med Educ. 2006; 33: 447–454.
    1. Qayumi AK, Kurihara Y, Imai M, Pachev G, Seo H, Hoshino Y, et al. Comparison of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional textbook methods for training in abdominal examination (Japanese experience) Med Educ. 2004; 38: 1080–1088.
    1. Browne L, Mehra S, Rattan R, Thomas G. Comparing lecture and e-learning as pedagogies for new and experienced professionals in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2004; 197: 95–97.
    1. Walmsley AD, White DA, Eynon R, Somerfield L. The use of the Internet within a dental school. Eur J Dent Educ. 2003; 7: 27–33.
    1. Bates ML, Strother EA, Brunet DP, Gallo JR 3rd. Electronic textbooks as a professional resource after dental school. J Dent Educ. 2012; 76: 635–640.
    1. Hillenburg KL, Cederberg RA, Gray SA, Hurst CL, Johnson GK, Potter BJ. E-learning and the future of dental education: opinions of administrators and information technology specialists. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006; 10: 169–177.
    1. Hendricson WD, Panagakos F, Eisenberg E, McDonald J, Guest G, Jones P, et al. Electronic curriculum implementation at North American dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2004; 68: 1041–1057.
    1. Mattheos N, Nattestad A, Schittek M, Attström R. A virtual classroom for undergraduate periodontology: a pilot study. Eur J Dent Educ. 2001; 5: 139–147.
    1. Oakley M, Spallek H. Social media in dental education: a call for research and action. J Dent Educ. 2012; 76: 279–287.
    1. Donnelly AB, Agius RM. The Distance Learning Courses in Occupational Medicine--20 years and onwards. Occup Med (Lond) 2005; 55: 319–323.
    1. McCann AL, Schneiderman ED, Hinton RJ. E-teaching and learning preferences of dental and dental hygiene students. J Dent Educ. 2010; 74: 65–78.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться