A Pragmatic Study of Basal and Mid-Mixture Insulins as Starter Insulins in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Observations From Long-Term, Real-World Experience

Tianshu Zeng, Huijuan Yuan, Jiangong Ren, Yuanyuan Li, Jianing Hou, Liying Du, Jiankun Zhu, Lulu Chen, Linong Ji, Tianshu Zeng, Huijuan Yuan, Jiangong Ren, Yuanyuan Li, Jianing Hou, Liying Du, Jiankun Zhu, Lulu Chen, Linong Ji

Abstract

Introduction: According to Chinese guidelines, basal insulin (BI) or premixed insulins are recommended insulin starters following the failure of oral antihyperglycemic medication (OAM) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This pragmatic study investigated the long-term effectiveness, safety, and cost of add-on BI and mid-mixture insulin analog (MMI) regimens in Chinese patients with T2D.

Methods: This multicenter, open-label, pragmatic study randomized patients 1:1 to receive either BI or MMI with OAMs adjusted according to current standards of care. We evaluated the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline, safety parameters, and antidiabetic medication costs.

Results: Change in HbA1c from baseline showed a statistically greater decrease at week 48 in the MMI group (MMI: - 2.03% [0.06] vs. BI: - 1.82% [0.06]; P < 0.05). Both groups showed decreases in fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) (MMI: - 2.53 [0.14] vs. BI: - 3.19 [0.14]; P < 0.01) and postprandial glucose (mmol/L) (MMI: - 4.35 [0.22] vs. BI: - 4.33 [0.23]). More patients in the BI group showed increases in OAM use, while OAM use decreased in the MMI group. Both groups showed stable glycemic control with a very limited insulin dose change from week 24 to week 48. The incidence of total hypoglycemia was higher in the MMI group (MMI: 124% [30.7] vs. BI: 76% [18.5], P < 0.0001), but no incidence of severe hypoglycemia was reported in either group. Treatment costs, in terms of average daily cost and cost of glycemic control, were higher in the BI group.

Conclusion: In long-term real-world use, the MMI and BI groups demonstrated improved glycemic control, with the MMI group showing more significant improvement than the BI group. Hypoglycemia incidence was higher in the MMI group, with no major safety issues through week 48. MMI is likely to provide better price value than BI for the treatment of T2D in Chinese patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03018938.

Keywords: Basal insulin; Chinese patients; Premixed insulin; Real-world study; Type 2 diabetes.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition. †Six patients failed the screening process but were randomized. ‡Two patients did not have a reason for discontinuation. N total population, n number of patients in each category
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in HbA1c at week 48 from baseline using analysis of covariance. †LSM difference (95% CI) between MMI + OAM (MMI group) and BI + OAM (BI group). LSM values and P-values are based on an analysis of covariance model. BI basal insulin, CI confidence interval, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, LSM least-squares mean, MMI mid-mixture insulin, OAM oral antihyperglycemic medication, SE standard error

References

    1. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14:88–98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151.
    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas, 9th edition. 2019. . Accessed 6 Mar 2020.
    1. Foos V, Wang K, McEwan P, et al. Assessing the burden of type 2 diabetes in China considering the current status-quo management and implications of improved management using a modeling approach. Value Health Reg Issues. 2019;18:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.08.006.
    1. Jia W, Weng J, Zhu D, et al. Standards of medical care for type 2 diabetes in China 2019. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019;35:e3158. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3158.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S90–102.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S103–23.
    1. Wang C, Gao Y, Zhu L, Huang M, Wu Y, Xuan J. Treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in China: a retrospective, longitudinal database study. Clin Ther. 2019;41:1440–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.05.003.
    1. Tien KJ, Hung YJ, Chen JF, et al. Basal insulin therapy: unmet medical needs in Asia and the new insulin glargine in diabetes treatment. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10:560–70.
    1. Su Q, Liu C, Zheng H, et al. Comparison of insulin lispro mix 25 with insulin lispro mix 50 as insulin starter in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (CLASSIFY study): subgroup analysis of a phase 4 open-label randomized trial. J Diabetes. 2017;9:575–85.
    1. Kumar A. Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart and biphasic insulin lispro mix in patients with type 2 diabetes: a review of the literature. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20:288–299. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.179993.
    1. Sheu WH, Ji L, Lee WJ, Jabbar A, Han JH, Lew T. Efficacy and safety of premixed insulin analogs in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8:518–534. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12605.
    1. Anyanwagu U, Mamza J, Gordon J, Donnelly R, Idris I. Premixed vs basal-bolus insulin regimen in type 2 diabetes: comparison of clinical outcomes from randomized controlled trials and real-world data. Diabet Med. 2017;34:1728–36.
    1. Blonde L, Marre M, Vincent M, et al. Insulin regimens and glycemic control in different parts of Europe over 4 years after starting insulin in people with type 2 diabetes: data from the CREDIT non-interventional study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;133:150–8.
    1. Zhang X, Ma Y, Chen H, Lou Y, Ji L, Chen L. A pragmatic study of mid-mixture insulin and basal insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antihyperglycaemic medications: a lesson from real-world experience. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22:1436–1442. doi: 10.1111/dom.14052.
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 1997;277:925–6.
    1. Malone JK, Bai S, Campaigne BN, Reviriego J, Augendre-Ferrante B. Twice-daily pre-mixed insulin rather than basal insulin therapy alone results in better overall glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005;22:374–81.
    1. Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, Andersen M, Davies MJ. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3411–3417. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0331.
    1. Brown JB, Nichols GA, Perry A. The burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1535–1540. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.7.1535.
    1. Khunti K, Nikolajsen A, Thorsted BL, Andersen M, Davies MJ, Paul SK. Clinical inertia with regard to intensifying therapy in people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:401–409. doi: 10.1111/dom.12626.
    1. Ji L, Zhang P, Zhu D, et al. Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment (ORBIT) in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: real-life use of basal insulin in China. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:822–830. doi: 10.1111/dom.12886.
    1. Malone JK, Kerr LF, Campaigne BN, Sachson RA, Holcombe JH, Lispro Mixture-Glargine Study Group Combined therapy with insulin lispro Mix 75/25 plus metformin or insulin glargine plus metformin: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, crossover study in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy. Clin Ther. 2004;26:2034–2044. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.015.
    1. Buse JB, Wolffenbuttel BH, Herman WH, et al. DURAbility of basal versus lispro mix 75/25 insulin efficacy (DURABLE) trial 24-week results: safety and efficacy of insulin lispro mix 75/25 versus insulin glargine added to oral antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1007–1013. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2117.
    1. Ilag LL, Kerr L, Malone JK, Tan MH. Prandial premixed insulin analog regimens versus basal insulin analog regimens in the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based comparison (review) Clin Ther. 2007;29:1254–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.003.
    1. Elliott L, Fidler C, Ditchfield A, Stissing T. Hypoglycemia event rates: a comparison between real-world data and randomized controlled trial populations in insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7:45–60. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0157-z.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться