Functional and symptom impact of trametinib versus chemotherapy in BRAF V600E advanced or metastatic melanoma: quality-of-life analyses of the METRIC study

D Schadendorf, M M Amonkar, M Milhem, K Grotzinger, L V Demidov, P Rutkowski, C Garbe, R Dummer, J C Hassel, P Wolter, P Mohr, U Trefzer, C Lefeuvre-Plesse, A Rutten, N Steven, G Ullenhag, L Sherman, F S Wu, K Patel, M Casey, C Robert, D Schadendorf, M M Amonkar, M Milhem, K Grotzinger, L V Demidov, P Rutkowski, C Garbe, R Dummer, J C Hassel, P Wolter, P Mohr, U Trefzer, C Lefeuvre-Plesse, A Rutten, N Steven, G Ullenhag, L Sherman, F S Wu, K Patel, M Casey, C Robert

Abstract

Background: In a randomized phase III study, trametinib prolonged progression-free survival and improved overall survival versus chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma.

Patients and methods: Patients' quality of life (QOL) was assessed at baseline and follow-up visits using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core QOL questionnaire.

Results: In the primary efficacy population (BRAF V600E+, no brain metastases) from baseline to weeks 6 and 12, patients' global health status scores worsened by 4-5 points with chemotherapy but improved by 2-3 points with trametinib. Rapid and substantive reductions in QOL functionality (e.g. role functioning, 8-11 points at weeks 6 and 12) and symptom exacerbation (e.g. fatigue, 4-8 points; nausea and vomiting, 5 points, both at weeks 6 and 12) were observed in chemotherapy-treated patients. In contrast, trametinib-treated patients reported small improvements or slight worsening from baseline at week 12, depending on the functional dimension and symptom. The mean symptom-scale scores for chemotherapy-treated patients increased from baseline (symptoms worsened) for seven of eight symptoms at week 6 (except insomnia) and six of eight symptoms at week 12 (except dyspnea and insomnia). In contrast, at weeks 6 and 12, the mean symptom-scale scores for trametinib decreased from baseline (symptoms improved) for pain (11-12 points), insomnia (10-12 points), and appetite loss (1-5 points), whereas those for diarrhea worsened (15-16 points). Mixed-model repeated-measures analyses showed significant (P < 0.05) and/or clinically meaningful improvements (small to moderate) from baseline in favor of trametinib for global health; physical, role, and social functioning; fatigue; pain; insomnia; nausea and vomiting; constipation; dyspnea; and appetite at weeks 6 and/or 12. QOL results for the intent-to-treat population were consistent.

Conclusions: This first QOL assessment for a MEK inhibitor in metastatic melanoma demonstrated that trametinib was associated with less functional impairment, smaller declines in health status, and less exacerbation of symptoms versus chemotherapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01245062.

Keywords: BRAF; MEK; chemotherapy; melanoma; quality of life; trametinib.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Change from baseline for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health and functional dimension scores (randomized phase). + indicates the mean. Boxes show 25th to 75th percentiles. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire; PD, progressive disease; Wk, week.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Change from baseline for EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom scores (randomized phase) at week 6 (6), week 12 (12) and at disease progression (PD). + indicates the mean. Boxes show 25th to 75th percentiles. EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться