The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP)

Karen L Lewis, Carrie A Bohnert, Wendy L Gammon, Henrike Hölzer, Lorraine Lyman, Cathy Smith, Tonya M Thompson, Amelia Wallace, Gayle Gliva-McConvey, Karen L Lewis, Carrie A Bohnert, Wendy L Gammon, Henrike Hölzer, Lorraine Lyman, Cathy Smith, Tonya M Thompson, Amelia Wallace, Gayle Gliva-McConvey

Abstract

In this paper, we define the Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP) for those working with human role players who interact with learners in a wide range of experiential learning and assessment contexts. These human role players are variously described by such terms as standardized/simulated patients or simulated participants (SP or SPs). ASPE is a global organization whose mission is to share advances in SP-based pedagogy, assessment, research, and scholarship as well as support the professional development of its members. The SOBP are intended to be used in conjunction with the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM, which address broader simulation practices. We begin by providing a rationale for the creation of the ASPE SOBP, noting that with the increasing use of simulation in healthcare training, it is incumbent on ASPE to establish SOBP that ensure the growth, integrity, and safe application of SP-based educational endeavors. We then describe the three and a half year process through which these standards were developed by a consensus of international experts in the field. Key terms used throughout the document are defined. Five underlying values inform the SOBP: safety, quality, professionalism, accountability, and collaboration. Finally, we describe five domains of best practice: safe work environment; case development; SP training for role portrayal, feedback, and completion of assessment instruments; program management; and professional development. Each domain is divided into principles with accompanying key practices that provide clear and practical guidelines for achieving desired outcomes and creating simulations that are safe for all stakeholders. Failure to follow the ASPE SOBP could compromise the safety of participants and the effectiveness of a simulation session. Care has been taken to make these guidelines precise yet flexible enough to address the diversity of varying contexts of SP practice. As a living document, these SOBP will be reviewed and modified periodically under the direction of the ASPE Standards of Practice Committee as SP methodology grows and adapts to evolving simulation practices.

Keywords: Case design; Feedback; Patient simulation; Simulated patient; Simulated patient methodology; Simulation training; Standardized patient; Standardized patient methodology; Standards; Training.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ASPE underlying values and SOBP domains

References

    1. Nestel D, Mobley B, Hunt EA, Eppich WJ. Confederates in healthcare simulations: not as simple as it seems. Clin Simul Nurs. 2014;10(12):611–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2014.09.007.
    1. Nestel D, Sanko J, McNaughton N. Simulated participant methodologies: maintaining humanism in practice. In: Nestel D, Kelly M, Jolly B, Watson M, editors. Healthcare Simulation Education: evidence, theory and practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018. pp. 45–53.
    1. Association of Standardized Patient Educators. About ASPE. Available from: . Accessed 12 June 2017.
    1. Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM debriefing. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S21–S5. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.008.
    1. Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM facilitation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S16–S20. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.007.
    1. Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM outcomes and objectives. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S13–S5. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.006.
    1. Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM participant evaluation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S26–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.009.
    1. Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM professional integrity. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S30–S3. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.010.
    1. Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S5–S12. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005.
    1. Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM Simulation-Enhanced Interprofessional Education (Sim-IPE) Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S34–S8. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.011.
    1. Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM simulation glossary. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:S39–S47. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.012.
    1. Custer RL, Scarcella JA, Stewart BR. The modified Delphi technique—a rotational modification. J. Vocat. Tech. Educ. 1999;15(2):50–8.
    1. Lopreiato J, Downing D, Gammon W, Lioce L, Sittner B, Slot V, et al. Healthcare Simulation Dictionary. 2016. Available from: . Accessed 12 June 2017.
    1. Berenson LD, Goodill SW, Wenger S. Standardized patient feedback: making it work across disciplines. J Allied Health. 2012;41(1):27E–31E.
    1. Association AER, Association AP, Education NCoMi . Standards for educational and psychological testing: American Educational Research Association. 1999.
    1. Cruess SR, Johnston S, Cruess RL. “Profession”: a working definition for medical educators. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(1):74–6. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1601_15.
    1. Nursing AAoCo Hallmarks of the professional nursing practice environment. J Prof Nurs. 2002;18(5):295–304. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2002.129231.
    1. Steinert Y. Perspectives on faculty development: aiming for 6/6 by 2020. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2012;1(1):31–42. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0006-3.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться