Impact of preoperative breast MRI on 10-year survival of patients included in the Swedish randomized multicentre POMB trial

V Gonzalez, B Arver, L Löfgren, L Bergkvist, K Sandelin, S Eriksson, V Gonzalez, B Arver, L Löfgren, L Bergkvist, K Sandelin, S Eriksson

Abstract

Background: The value of preoperative breast MRI as an adjunct technique regarding its effect on re-excision rates has been a subject of discussion. No survival data regarding preoperative breast MRI are available from randomized studies.

Methods: Ten-year follow-up of the POMB randomized multicentre study was analysed, evaluating MRI and its effect on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were randomized to either preoperative MRI or conventional imaging. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyse DFS and OS, and Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs).

Results: A total of 440 patients, aged 56 years or less, with newly diagnosed breast cancer were randomized to either preoperative MRI (220) or conventional imaging (220; control). Median follow-up for each group was 10 years. DFS rates were 85.5 and 80.0 per cent for the MRI and control groups respectively (P = 0.099). The risk of relapse or death was 46 per cent higher in the control group (HR 1.46, 95 per cent c.i. 0.93 to 2.29). OS rates after 10 years were 90.9 and 88.6 per cent in the MRI and control groups respectively (P = 0.427). The risk of death was 27 per cent higher in the control group (HR 1.27, 0.71 to 2.29). Locoregional, distant, and contralateral recurrence outcomes combined were increased in the control group (P = 0.048). A subgroup analysis of patients with breast cancer stages I-III showed that preoperative MRI improved DFS compared with conventional imaging, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.057).

Conclusion: After 10 years of follow-up, preoperative breast MRI as an adjunct to conventional imaging resulted in slightly, but non-significantly, improved DFS and OS. Registration number: NCT01859936 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram for trial DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves over 10 years of follow-up for 440 patients included in the POMB study with newly diagnosed breast cancer who did or did not undergo preoperative MRI a Breast cancer disease-free survival and b overall survival. The results of intention-to-treat analysis are shown. a  P = 0.099, b  P = 0.427 (log rank test).

References

    1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233–1241.
    1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery plus radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227–1232.
    1. Litiere S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, Rutgers E, Christiaens MR, Limbergen EV et al. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I–II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:412–419.
    1. Fisher S, Gao H, Yasui Y, Dabbs K, Winget M. Survival in stage I–III breast cancer patients by surgical treatment in a publicly funded health care system. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1161–1169.
    1. Chen K, Liu J, Zhu L, Su F, Song E, Jacobs LK. Comparative effectiveness study of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in the general population: a NCDB analysis. Oncotarget 2015;6:40 127–40 140.
    1. Hwang ES, Lichtensztajn DY, Gomez SL, Fowble B, Clarke CA. Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status. Cancer 2013;119:1402–1411.
    1. Kurian AW, Lichtensztajn DY, Keegan THM, Nelson DO, Clarke CA, Gomez SL. Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998–2011. JAMA 2014;312:902–914.
    1. Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Kokeny K, Agarwal J. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 2014;149:267–274.
    1. Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:274–280.
    1. Olsen M, Nickel KB, Margenthaler J, Wallace AE, Mines D, Miller JP et al. Increased risk of surgical site infection among breast-conserving surgery re-excisions. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:2003–2009.
    1. Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 2008;246:116–124.
    1. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3248–3258.
    1. Morrow M, Freedman G. A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006;14:363–378.
    1. Turnbull LW, Brown SR, Olivier C, Harvey I, Brown J, Drew P et al.; COMICE Trial Group. Multicentre randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced high field magnetic resonance imaging in women with primary breast cancer scheduled for wide local excision (COMICE). Health Technol Assess 2010;14:1–182.
    1. Peters NHGM, van Esser S, van den Bosch MAAJ, Plaisier PW, van Dalen T, Diepstraten SC et al. Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:879–886.
    1. Brück N, Koskivuo I, Boström P, Saunavaara J, Aaltonen R, Parkkola R. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with stage I invasive ductal breast cancer: a prospective randomized study. Scand J Surg 2018;107:14–22.
    1. Gonzalez V, Sandelin K, Karlsson A, Åberg W, Löfgren L, Iliescu G et al. Preoperative MRI of the breast (POMB) influences primary treatment in breast cancer: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. World J Surg 2014;38:1685–1693.
    1. Karlsson A, Gonzalez V, Jonmarker JS, Bottai M, Sandelin K, Arver B et al. The accuracy of incremental pre-operative breast MRI findings—concordance with histopathology in the Swedish randomized multicenter POMB trial. Eur J Radiol 2019;114:185–191.
    1. Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B, Gregorio R, Brown R, Wickerham L; Collaborating NSABP Investigators. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). II. Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity. Cancer 1986;57:1717–1724.
    1. Hellman S. Stopping metastases at their source. N Engl J Med 1997;337:996–997.
    1. van Tienhoven G, Voogd AC, Peterse JL, Nielsen M, Andersen KW, Mignolet F et al. Prognosis after treatment for locoregional recurrence after mastectomy or breast conserving therapy in two randomised trials (EORTC 10801 and DBCG-82TM). Eur J Cancer 1999;35:32–38.
    1. Brooks JP, Danforth DN, Albert P, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Camphausen KA et al. Early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast conservation affect survival: an analysis of the National Cancer Institute randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:785–789.
    1. Doyle T, Schultz DJ, Peters C, Harris E, Solin LJ. Long-term results of local recurrence after breast conservation treatment for invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:74–80.
    1. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute randomized trial. Cancer 2003;98:697–702.
    1. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1143–1150.
    1. Vaidya JS, Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Merchant N, Sharma OP, Mittra I. Multicentricity of breast cancer: whole-organ analysis and clinical implications. Br J Cancer 1996;74:820–824.
    1. Breast Cancer Guideline, NABON 2012. (accessed 1 September 2020).
    1. Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, Schnall M, Reynolds C, Spitz FR et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2003;98:468–473.
    1. Socialstyrelsen. (accessed 1 September 2020).
    1. Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, von Heyden D, Funke M, Liersch T. The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1725–1731.
    1. Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, Harris EE, Schnall MD. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:386–391.
    1. Sung JS, Li J, Da Costa G, Patil S, Van Zee KJ, Dershaw DD et al. Preoperative breast MRI for early-stage breast cancer: effect on surgical and long-term outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:1376–1382.
    1. Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P, Turnbull LW, McCready DR, Tuttle TM et al. An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:392–401.
    1. Clark M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans V et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005;366:2087–2106.
    1. Richter V, Hatterman V, Preibsch H, Bahrs DS, Hahn M, Nikolaou K et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients with MRI contraindications. Acta Radiol 2018;59:798–805.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться