Safety Overview of a Recombinant Live-Attenuated Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine: Pooled Analysis of Data from 18 Clinical Trials

Sophia Gailhardou, Anna Skipetrova, Gustavo H Dayan, John Jezorwski, Melanie Saville, Diane Van der Vliet, T Anh Wartel, Sophia Gailhardou, Anna Skipetrova, Gustavo H Dayan, John Jezorwski, Melanie Saville, Diane Van der Vliet, T Anh Wartel

Abstract

A recombinant live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) has been shown to be efficacious in preventing virologically-confirmed dengue disease, severe dengue disease and dengue hospitalization in children aged 2-16 years in Asia and Latin America. We analyzed pooled safety data from 18 phase I, II and III clinical trials in which the dengue vaccine was administered to participants aged 2-60 years, including long-term safety follow-up in three efficacy trials. The participants were analyzed according to their age at enrollment. The percentage of participants aged 2-60 years reporting ≥1 solicited injection-site or systemic reactions was slightly higher in the CYD-TDV group than in the placebo group. The most common solicited injection-site reactions were pain. Headache and malaise were the most common solicited systemic reactions. In both groups 0.3% of participants discontinued for safety reasons. The most common unsolicited adverse events were injection-site reactions, gastrointestinal disorders, and infections. Reactogenicity did not increase with successive doses of CYD-TDV. The frequency and nature of SAEs occurring within 28 days of any dose were similar in the CYD-TDV and placebo groups and were common medical conditions that could be expected as a function of age. Baseline dengue virus serostatus did not appear to influence the safety profile. No vaccine-related anaphylactic reactions, neurotropic events or viscerotropic events were reported. In year 3 after dose 1, an imbalance for dengue hospitalization, including for severe dengue, observed in participants aged <9 years in the CYD-TDV group compared with the placebo group was not observed for participants aged ≥9 years. In Year 4, this imbalance in participants aged <9 years was less marked, giving an overall lower risk of dengue hospitalization or severe dengue from dose 1 to Year 4 in the CYD-TDV group. These results have contributed to the definition of the target population for vaccination (≥9 years old) for which CYD-TDV has a satisfactory safety profile. Long-term safety will continue to be monitored in the ongoing follow-up of efficacy trials. Safety and effectiveness in real-life settings will be assessed through post-licensure studies.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: all authors were employees of Sanofi Pasteur at the time the study was conducted and the manuscript was written. This does not alter their adherence to all PLOS policies on sharing data and materials. All authors hold Sanofi Pasteur shares/stock options.

Figures

Fig 1. Overall safety profile of CYD-TDV…
Fig 1. Overall safety profile of CYD-TDV and placebo.
Percentages and 95% confidence intervals for participants those who received at least one dose of CYD-TDV (left) or placebo (right) reporting solicited injection-site reactions within 7 days of any dose, solicited systemic reactions within 14 days of any dose, unsolicited AEs and SAEs within 28 days of any dose, by age group.
Fig 2. Safety profile after each dose…
Fig 2. Safety profile after each dose of CYD-TDV.
Percentages and 95% confidence intervals for participants those who received at least one dose of CYD-TDV reporting solicited injection-site reactions within 7 days after each dose, solicited systemic reactions within 14 days after each dose, unsolicited AEs and SAEs within 28 days after each dose, by age group children (2–8 years), adolescents (9–17 years) and adults (≥18 years).
Fig 3. Effect of dengue sero-status at…
Fig 3. Effect of dengue sero-status at baseline on CYD-TDV safety profile by age.
The percentages and 95% confidence intervals for participants who had received at ≥1 dose of CYD-TDV who reported solicited injection-site reactions, solicited systemic reactions, unsolicited non-serious adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) within 28 days of any dose by age (2–8 years and 9–60 years) and baseline dengue sero-status: sero-negative (left); sero-positive (right)
Fig 4. Relative risk (solid line) and…
Fig 4. Relative risk (solid line) and 95% confidence interval (dotted lines) against hospitalized or severe dengue due to any serotype by age at enrollment.
The Epanechnikov kernel method (with h = 2.0) was used to provide a smooth curve. Data were combined from post-dose 1 up to year 3 in the phase III trial in Latin America and up to year 4 in the phase IIb and phase III trial in Asia.

References

    1. Simmons CP, Farrar JJ, Nguyen v V, Wills B. Dengue. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1423–32. Epub 2012/04/13. 10.1056/NEJMra1110265 .
    1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–7. Epub 2013/04/09. 10.1038/nature12060
    1. Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, et al. Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(8):e1760 Epub 2012/08/11. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001760
    1. World Health Organization. Dengue and severe dengue. Fact sheet no. 117 2015 [20 November 2015]. Available from: .
    1. Guirakhoo F, Kitchener S, Morrison D, Forrat R, McCarthy K, Nichols R, et al. Live attenuated chimeric yellow fever dengue type 2 (ChimeriVax-DEN2) vaccine: Phase I clinical trial for safety and immunogenicity: effect of yellow fever pre-immunity in induction of cross neutralizing antibody responses to all 4 dengue serotypes. Human vaccines. 2006;2(2):60–7. Epub 2006/10/03. .
    1. Capeding RZ, Luna IA, Bomasang E, Lupisan S, Lang J, Forrat R, et al. Live-attenuated, tetravalent dengue vaccine in children, adolescents and adults in a dengue endemic country: randomized controlled phase I trial in the Philippines. Vaccine. 2011;29(22):3863–72. Epub 2011/04/12. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.03.057 .
    1. Dayan GH, Garbes P, Noriega F, Izoton de Sadovsky AD, Rodrigues PM, Giuberti C, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant tetravalent dengue vaccine in children and adolescents ages 9–16 years in Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89(6):1058–65. 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0304
    1. Dayan GH, Thakur M, Boaz M, Johnson C. Safety and immunogenicity of three tetravalent dengue vaccine formulations in healthy adults in the USA. Vaccine. 2013;31(44):5047–54. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.088 .
    1. Lanata CF, Andrade T, Gil AI, Terrones C, Valladolid O, Zambrano B, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of tetravalent dengue vaccine in 2–11 year-olds previously vaccinated against yellow fever: randomized, controlled, phase II study in Piura, Peru. Vaccine. 2012;30(41):5935–41. Epub 2012/08/07. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.07.043 .
    1. Leo YS, Wilder-Smith A, Archuleta S, Shek LP, Chong CY, Leong HN, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of recombinant tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) in individuals aged 2–45 y: Phase II randomized controlled trial in Singapore. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8(9):1259–71. Epub 2012/08/17. 10.4161/hv.21224 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3579907.
    1. Morrison D, Legg TJ, Billings CW, Forrat R, Yoksan S, Lang J. A novel tetravalent dengue vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic against all 4 serotypes in flavivirus-naive adults. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(3):370–7. Epub 2010/01/12. 10.1086/649916 .
    1. Poo J, Galan F, Forrat R, Zambrano B, Lang J, Dayan GH. Live-attenuated Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine in Dengue-naive Children, Adolescents, and Adults in Mexico City: Randomized Controlled Phase 1 Trial of Safety and Immunogenicity. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;[Epub ahead of print]. Epub 2010/11/03. 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181fe05af .
    1. Qiao M, Shaw D, Forrat R, Wartel-Tram A, Lang J. Priming effect of dengue and yellow fever vaccination on the immunogenicity, infectivity, and safety of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in humans. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85(4):724–31. Epub 2011/10/07. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10–0436 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3183784.
    1. Sabchareon A, Wallace D, Sirivichayakul C, Limkittikul K, Chanthavanich P, Suvannadabba S, et al. Protective efficacy of the recombinant, live-attenuated, CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren: a randomised, controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9853):1559–67. Epub 2012/09/15. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61428-7 .
    1. Tran NH, Luong CQ, Vu TQH, Forrat R, Lang J, Vu QD, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of recombinant, live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) in healthy Vietnamese adults and children. J Vaccines Vaccin. 2012;3:162.
    1. Villar LA, Rivera-Medina DM, Arredondo-Garcia JL, Boaz M, Starr-Spires L, Thakur M, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant tetravalent dengue vaccine in 9–16 year olds: a randomized, controlled, phase II trial in Latin America. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(10):1102–9. 10.1097/INF.0b013e31829b8022 .
    1. McArthur MA, Sztein MB, Edelman R. Dengue vaccines: recent developments, ongoing challenges and current candidates. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2013;12(8):933–53. Epub 2013/08/30. 10.1586/14760584.2013.815412
    1. Guy B, Barrere B, Malinowski C, Saville M, Teyssou R, Lang J. From research to phase III: preclinical, industrial and clinical development of the Sanofi Pasteur tetravalent dengue vaccine. Vaccine. 2011;29(42):7229–41. Epub 2011/07/13. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.094 .
    1. Capeding MR, Tran NH, Hadinegoro SR, Ismail HI, Chotpitayasunondh T, Chua MN, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of a novel tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children in Asia: a phase 3, randomised, observer-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9951):1358–65. Epub 2014/07/16. 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61060-6 .
    1. Villar L, Dayan GH, Arredondo-Garcia JL, Rivera DM, Cunha R, Deseda C, et al. Efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in children in Latin America. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):113–23. Epub 2014/11/05. 10.1056/NEJMoa1411037 .
    1. Sabchareon A, Wallace D, Sirivichayakul C, Limkittikul K, Chanthavanich P, Suvannadabba S, et al. Protective efficacy of the recombinant, live-attenuated, CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren: a randomised, controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9853):1559–67. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61428-7
    1. Hadinegoro SR, Arredondo-Garcia JL, Capeding MR, Deseda C, Chotpitayasunondh T, Dietze R, et al. Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of a Dengue Vaccine in Regions of Endemic Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1195–206. Epub 2015/07/28. 10.1056/NEJMoa1506223 .
    1. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of dengue vaccines in endemic areas Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Bentsi-Enchill AD, Schmitz J, Edelman R, Durbin A, Roehrig JT, Smith PG, et al. Long-term safety assessment of live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccines: deliberations from a WHO technical consultation. Vaccine. 2013;31(23):2603–9. Epub 2013/04/11. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.038 .
    1. Poo J, Galan F, Forrat R, Zambrano B, Lang J, Dayan G. Live-attenuated Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine in Dengue-naive Children, Adolescents, and Adults in Mexico City: Randomized Controlled Phase 1 Trial of Safety and Immunogenicity. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(1):e9–17. Epub 2010/11/03. 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181fe05af .
    1. Dayan GH, Galan-Herrera JF, Forrat R, Zambrano B, Bouckenooghe A, Harenberg A, et al. Assessment of bivalent and tetravalent dengue vaccine formulations in flavivirus-naive adults in Mexico. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(10):2853–63. Epub 2014/12/09. 10.4161/21645515.2014.972131 .
    1. Harenberg A, Begue S, Mamessier A, Gimenez-Fourage S, Ching Seah C, Wei Liang A, et al. Persistence of Th1/Tc1 responses one year after tetravalent dengue vaccination in adults and adolescents in Singapore. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;9(11):5–4. 10.4161/hv.25562
    1. Dubey AP, Agarkhedkar S, Chhatwal J, Narayan A, Ganguly S, Wartel TA, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy adults in India: a randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015:0. Epub 2015/08/21. 10.1080/21645515.2015.1076598 .
    1. Hss AS, Koh MT, Tan KK, Chan LG, Zhou L, Bouckenooghe A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children aged 2–11 years in Malaysia: a randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III study. Vaccine. 2013;31(49):5814–21. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.013 .
    1. Torresi J, Heron LG, Qiao M, Marjason J, Chambonneau L, Bouckenooghe A, et al. Lot-to-lot consistency of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy adults in Australia: A randomised study. Vaccine. 2015;33(39):5127–34. Epub 2015/08/19. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.008 .
    1. Gershman MD, Staples JE, Bentsi-Enchill AD, Breugelmans JG, Brito GS, Camacho LA, et al. Viscerotropic disease: case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2012;30(33):5038–58. Epub 2012/05/09. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.067
    1. Staples JE, Gershman M, Fischer M, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Yellow fever vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-7):1–27. Epub 2010/07/31. .
    1. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. Guidelines on the quality, safety and efficacy of dengue tetravalent vaccines (live, attenuated) Annex 1 (Proposed replacement of WHO Technical Report Series, No. 932). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Capeding MR, Chua MN, Hadinegoro SR, Hussain II, Nallusamy R, Pitisuttithum P, et al. Dengue and other common causes of acute febrile illness in Asia: an active surveillance study in children. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(7):e2331 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002331
    1. Villar LA, Rojas DP, Besada-Lombana S, Sarti E. Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Colombia (2000–2011): a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(3):e0003499 Epub 2015/03/20. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003499 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4366106.
    1. World Health Organization. Dengue haemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. 2nd edition ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.
    1. Cottin P, Niedrig M, Domingo C. Safety profile of the yellow fever vaccine Stamaril(R): a 17-year review. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2013;12(11):1351–68. 10.1586/14760584.2013.836320 .
    1. Monath TP, Seligman SJ, Robertson JS, Guy B, Hayes EB, Condit RC, et al. Live virus vaccines based on a yellow fever vaccine backbone: Standardized template with key considerations for a risk/benefit assessment. Vaccine. 2015;33(1):62–72. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.004
    1. Gritsun TS, Holmes EC, Gould EA. Analysis of flavivirus envelope proteins reveals variable domains that reflect their antigenicity and may determine their pathogenesis. Virus Res. 1995;35(3):307–21. Epub 1995/03/01. .
    1. Guzman MG, Kouri G. Dengue: an update. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2(1):33–42. Epub 2002/03/15. .
    1. Guzman MG, Alvarez M, Halstead SB. Secondary infection as a risk factor for dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: an historical perspective and role of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection. Arch Virol. 2013;158(7):1445–59. Epub 2013/03/09. 10.1007/s00705-013-1645-3 .
    1. Rothman AL. Immunity to dengue virus: a tale of original antigenic sin and tropical cytokine storms. Nature reviews Immunology. 2011;11(8):532–43. Epub 2011/07/16. 10.1038/nri3014 .
    1. Balsitis SJ, Williams KL, Lachica R, Flores D, Kyle JL, Mehlhop E, et al. Lethal antibody enhancement of dengue disease in mice is prevented by Fc modification. PLoS pathogens. 2010;6(2):e1000790 Epub 2010/02/20. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000790 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2820409.
    1. Goncalvez AP, Engle RE, St Claire M, Purcell RH, Lai CJ. Monoclonal antibody-mediated enhancement of dengue virus infection in vitro and in vivo and strategies for prevention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(22):9422–7. Epub 2007/05/23. 10.1073/pnas.0703498104 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc1868655.
    1. Guzman MG, Vazquez S. The complexity of antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus infection. Viruses. 2010;2(12):2649–62. Epub 2011/10/14. 10.3390/v2122649 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3185591.
    1. Zellweger RM, Prestwood TR, Shresta S. Enhanced infection of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in a mouse model of antibody-induced severe dengue disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7(2):128–39. Epub 2010/02/16. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.01.004 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2824513.
    1. Guy B, Briand O, Lang J, Saville M, Jackson N. Development of the Sanofi Pasteur tetravalent dengue vaccine: One more step forward. Vaccine. 2015;33(50):7100–11. Epub 2015/10/18. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.108 .
    1. Guy B, Jackson N. Dengue vaccine: hypotheses to understand CYD-TDV-induced protection. Nature reviews Microbiology. 2016;14(1):45–54. Epub 2015/12/08. 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.2 .
    1. Guy B, Moser J, Byers A, Kachurin A, Harenberg A, Boudet F, et al. Immunological investigations to understand the outcome of the phase III efficacy studies of the Sanofi Pasteur dengue vaccine (Abstract no. 553). American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene—64th Annual Meeting; 2015 October 25–29; Philadelphia, PA.
    1. World Health Organisation. Dengue vaccine research 2016 [30 April 2016]. Available from: .

Source: PubMed

Подписаться