Improving cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks: a qualitative study

Meredith K D Hawking, Adam Timmis, Fae Wilkins, Jessica L Potter, John Robson, Meredith K D Hawking, Adam Timmis, Fae Wilkins, Jessica L Potter, John Robson

Abstract

Objective: The NHS Health Check programme is a public screening and prevention initiative in England to detect early signs of cardiovascular ill health among healthy adults. We aimed to explore patient perspectives and experiences of a personalised Risk Report designed to improve cardiovascular risk communication in the NHS Health Check.

Design and setting: This is a qualitative study with NHS Health Check attendees in three general practices in the London Borough of Newham.

Intervention and participants: A personalised Risk Report for the NHS Health Check was developed to improve communication of results and advice. The Risk Report was embedded in the electronic health record, printed with auto-filled results and used as a discussion aid during the NHS Health Check, and was a take-home record of information and advice on risk reduction for the attendees. 18 purposively sampled socially diverse participants took part in semistructured interviews, which were analysed thematically.

Results: For most participants, the NHS Health Check was an opportunity for reassurance and assessment, and the Risk Report was an enduring record that supported risk understanding, with impact beyond the individual. For a minority, ambivalence towards the Risk Report occurred in the context of attending for other reasons, and risk and lifestyle advice were not internalised or acted on.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the potential of a personalised Risk Report as a useful intervention in NHS Health Checks for enhancing patient understanding of cardiovascular risk and strategies for risk reduction. Also highlighted are the challenges that must be overcome to ensure transferability of these benefits to diverse patient groups.

Trial registration number: NCT02486913.

Keywords: communication; information technology; preventive medicine; primary care; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JR has a non-pecuniary interest as a coauthor of QRISK2 and is also a member of a national NHS Health Check advisory group.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Risk Report example pages.

References

    1. DOH Putting prevention first – NHS health check: vascular risk assessment and management best practice guidance. London: Department of Health, 2009.
    1. Baker C, Loughren EA, Crone D, et al. . Patients' perceptions of a NHS health check in the primary care setting. Qual Prim Care 2014;22:232–7.
    1. Riley R, Coghill N, Montgomery A, et al. . Experiences of patients and healthcare professionals of NHS cardiovascular health checks: a qualitative study. J Public Health 2016;38:543–51. 10.1093/pubmed/fdv121
    1. Perry C, Thurston M, Alford S, et al. . The NHS health check programme in England: a qualitative study. Health promotion international 2016;31:106–15.
    1. Krska J, du Plessis R, Chellaswamy H. Views and experiences of the NHS health check provided by general medical practices: cross-sectional survey in high-risk patients. J Public Health 2015;37:210–7. 10.1093/pubmed/fdu054
    1. McNaughton RJ, Shucksmith J. Reasons for (non)compliance with intervention following identification of 'high-risk' status in the NHS Health Check programme. J Public Health 2015;37:218–25. 10.1093/pubmed/fdu066
    1. Ismail H, Atkin K. The NHS health check programme: insights from a qualitative study of patients. Health Expect 2016;19:345–55. 10.1111/hex.12358
    1. Shaw RL, Lowe H, Holland C, et al. . GPs' perspectives on managing the NHS Health Check in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of implementation in one area of England: Table 1. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010951 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010951
    1. Robson J, Dostal I, Madurasinghe V, et al. . The NHS health check programme: implementation in East London 2009-2011. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007578 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007578
    1. Service OHM, Halpern D, Algate F, et al. . East: four ways to apply behavioural insights. London: Behavioural Insights Ltd, 2014.
    1. Powell J, Inglis N, Ronnie J, et al. . The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e20 10.2196/jmir.1600
    1. Quiroz-Aitken M, Cunningham-Burley S, Pagliari C. Moving from trust to Trustworthiness: experiences of public engagement in the Scottish health informatics programme. Science and Public Policy 2016.
    1. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Vinogradova Y, et al. . Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. BMJ 2008;336:1475–82. 10.1136/bmj.39609.449676.25
    1. JBS3 Board Joint British societies' consensus recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (JBS3). Heart 2014;100 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii1–67. 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305693
    1. Kurz-Milcke E, Gigerenzer G, Martignon L. Transparency in risk communication: graphical and analog tools. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1128:18–28. 10.1196/annals.1399.004
    1. Goodyear-Smith F, Arroll B, Chan L, et al. . Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment. The Annals of Family Medicine 2008;6:213–7. 10.1370/afm.795
    1. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M, Gigerenzer G. Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect? Med Decis Making 2010;30:672–84. 10.1177/0272989X10369000
    1. Galesic M, Garcia-Retamero R, Gigerenzer G. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychol 2009;28:210–6. 10.1037/a0014474
    1. Waldron C-A, van der Weijden T, Ludt S, et al. . What are effective strategies to communicate cardiovascular risk information to patients? A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2011;82:169–81. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.014
    1. Gigerenzer G. Dread risk, September 11, and fatal traffic accidents. Psychol Sci 2004;15:286–7. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00668.x
    1. Veldwijk J, Essers BAB, Lambooij MS, et al. . Survival or mortality: does risk attribute framing influence decision-making behavior in a discrete choice experiment? Value Health 2016;19:202–9. 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.004
    1. Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, et al. . Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;22 10.1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2
    1. Mason M. Sample size and saturation in PHD studies using qualitative interviews 2010;11.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. QSR, International, Pty, Ltd NVivo qualitative data analysis software version 10, 2012.
    1. Riley R, Coghill N, Montgomery A, et al. . The provision of NHS health checks in a community setting: an ethnographic account. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:546 10.1186/s12913-015-1209-1
    1. Ellis N, Gidlow C, Cowap L, et al. . A qualitative investigation of non-response in NHS health checks. Arch Public Health 2015;73:1–8. 10.1186/s13690-015-0064-1
    1. Jenkinson CE, Asprey A, Clark CE, et al. . Patients' willingness to attend the NHS cardiovascular health checks in primary care: a qualitative interview study. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:33 10.1186/s12875-015-0244-7
    1. Burgess C, Wright AJ, Forster AS, et al. . Influences on individuals' decisions to take up the offer of a health check: a qualitative study. Health Expect 2015;18:2437–48. 10.1111/hex.12212
    1. Shaw RL, Pattison HM, Holland C, et al. . Be smart: examining the experience of implementing the NHS health check in UK primary care. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:1 10.1186/s12875-014-0212-7
    1. van Steenkiste B, van der Weijden T, Timmermans D, et al. . Patients' ideas, fears and expectations of their coronary risk: barriers for primary prevention. Patient Educ Couns 2004;55:301–7. 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.005
    1. Lupton D. Risk as moral danger: the social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. International Journal of Health Services 1993;23:425–35. 10.2190/16AY-E2GC-DFLD-51X2
    1. Dalton A, Bottle R, Okoro C, et al. . Uptake of the NHS health checks programme in a deprived, culturally diverse setting: cross sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2011;65(Suppl 2). 10.1136/jech.2011.143586.47
    1. Dryden R, Williams B, McCowan C, et al. . What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? findings from a narrative scoping review. BMC Public Health 2012;12:723 10.1186/1471-2458-12-723
    1. Robb N, Greenhalgh T. “You have to cover up the words of the doctor”: The mediation of trust in interpreted consultations in primary care. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2006;20:434–55.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Collard A, Campbell-Richards D, et al. . Storylines of self-management: narratives of people with diabetes from a multiethnic inner City population. J Health Serv Res Policy 2011;16:37–43. 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.009160

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться