Prelude to passion: limbic activation by "unseen" drug and sexual cues

Anna Rose Childress, Ronald N Ehrman, Ze Wang, Yin Li, Nathan Sciortino, Jonathan Hakun, William Jens, Jesse Suh, John Listerud, Kathleen Marquez, Teresa Franklin, Daniel Langleben, John Detre, Charles P O'Brien, Anna Rose Childress, Ronald N Ehrman, Ze Wang, Yin Li, Nathan Sciortino, Jonathan Hakun, William Jens, Jesse Suh, John Listerud, Kathleen Marquez, Teresa Franklin, Daniel Langleben, John Detre, Charles P O'Brien

Abstract

Background: The human brain responds to recognizable signals for sex and for rewarding drugs of abuse by activation of limbic reward circuitry. Does the brain respond in similar way to such reward signals even when they are "unseen", i.e., presented in a way that prevents their conscious recognition? Can the brain response to "unseen" reward cues predict the future affective response to recognizable versions of such cues, revealing a link between affective/motivational processes inside and outside awareness?

Methodology/principal findings: We exploited the fast temporal resolution of event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test the brain response to "unseen" (backward-masked) cocaine, sexual, aversive and neutral cues of 33 milliseconds duration in male cocaine patients (n = 22). Two days after scanning, the affective valence for visible versions of each cue type was determined using an affective bias (priming) task. We demonstrate, for the first time, limbic brain activation by "unseen" drug and sexual cues of only 33 msec duration. Importantly, increased activity in an large interconnected ventral pallidum/amygdala cluster to the "unseen" cocaine cues strongly predicted future positive affect to visible versions of the same cues in subsequent off-magnet testing, pointing both to the functional significance of the rapid brain response, and to shared brain substrates for appetitive motivation within and outside awareness.

Conclusions/significance: These findings represent the first evidence that brain reward circuitry responds to drug and sexual cues presented outside awareness. The results underscore the sensitivity of the brain to "unseen" reward signals and may represent the brain's primordial signature for desire. The limbic brain response to reward cues outside awareness may represent a potential vulnerability in disorders (e.g., the addictions) for whom poorly-controlled appetitive motivation is a central feature.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. “Unseen” cue paradigm.
Figure 1. “Unseen” cue paradigm.
24 randomly-presented 33 msec targets in each of four categories (cocaine, sexual, aversive and neutral, interspersed with grey-screen nulls) were immediately followed by a 467 msec neutral “masking” stimulus”. Under these conditions, the 33 msec stimuli can escape conscious detection (see Methods for additional task details).
Figure 2. Limbic brain responses by 33…
Figure 2. Limbic brain responses by 33 msec “unseen” cues in cocaine patients.
Both cocaine (A) and sexual (B) cues produced activation in amygdala and ventral striatum/ventral pallidum/substantia innominata, and insula, as well as the OFC (OFC not shown). Statistical parametric t maps were generated by SPM 2; thresholded for display (color bar: 2<t<5) on the single-subject MNI brain template (“Colin”) in MRICro. Coronal brain sections on the left in (a) and (b) are at y = −6 mm; images on the right in (A) and (B) are at y = 10 mm and y = 6 mm, respectively. The response to “unseen” cocaine cues in a large bilateral ventral pallidum/left amygdala cluster (C) strongly predicted (peak voxel, MNI x, y, z coordinates: −14, −6, −6; t = 7.11; p = 0.000 uncorrected; p = 0.015 cluster-corrected) future affective response to visible cocaine cues (D; r = 0.92). Brain response to 33 msec “unseen” aversive cues (not shown; see Figure S1 in Supporting Materials) varied across individuals, with increased activity in the insula predicting the later affective response to visible aversive cues. Abbreviations: R: right, L: left, v: ventral, amyg: amygdala, si: substantia innominata, tp: temporal pole. [NOTE: The ventral boundary of the BOLD acquisition plane for the current studies is z = −40; temporal pole activations may extend ventrally below the acquisition plane.].

References

    1. Freud . The Interpretation of Dreams. (1913) Brill AA, translator. New York: MacMillan; 1900.
    1. Ohman A. The role of the amygdala in human fear: automatic detection of threat. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30:953–958.
    1. Whalen PJ, Kagan J, Cook RG, Davis FC, Kim H, et al. Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites. Science. 2004;306:2061.
    1. Rauch SL, Whalen PJ, Shin LM, McInerney SC, Macklin ML, et al. Exaggerated amygdala response to masked facial stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional MRI study. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47:769–776.
    1. Morris JS, Ohman A, Dolan RJ. Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature. 1998;393:467–470.
    1. Whalen PJ, Rauch SL, Etcoff NL, McInerney SC, Lee MB, et al. Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. J Neurosci. 1998;18:411–418.
    1. Darwin C. Sexual selection in relation to monkeys. Nature. 1876;15:18–19.
    1. Childress AR, Mozley PD, McElgin W, Fitzgerald J, Reivich M, et al. Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;156:11–18.
    1. Childress AR, Franklin TR, Listerud J, Acton PD, O'Brien CP. Neuroimaging of cocaine craving states: cessation, stimulant administration, and drug cue paradigms. In: Davis KL, Charney D, Coyle JT, Nemeroff C, editors. Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress. Philadelphia. 2002. pp. 1575–1590.
    1. Karama S, Lecours AR, Leroux JM, Bourgouin P, Beaudoin G, et al. Areas of brain activation in males and females during viewing of erotic film excerpts. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;16:1–13.
    1. Hamann S, Herman RA, Nolan CL, Wallen K. Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:411–416.
    1. McClure SM, York MK, Montague PR. The neural substrates of reward processing in humans: the modern role of FMRI. Neuroscientist. 2004;10:260–268.
    1. Garavan H, Pendergrass JC, Ross TJ, Stein EA, Risinger RC. Amygdala response to both positively and negatively valenced stimuli. Neuroreport. 2001;12:2779–2783.
    1. Hamann SB, Ely TD, Hoffman JM, Kilts CD. Ecstasy and agony: activation of the human amygdala in positive and negative emotion. Psychol Sci. 2002;13:135–141.
    1. Everitt BJ, Cardinal RN, Parkinson JA, Robbins TW. Appetitive behavior: impact of amygdala-dependent mechanisms of emotional learning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;985:233–250.
    1. Pavlov IP. Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. Anrep GV, translator and editor. London: University Press; 1927.
    1. Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Childress AR, O'Brien CP. Conditioned responses to cocaine-related stimuli in cocaine abuse patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;107:523–529.
    1. Garavan H, Pankiewicz J, Bloom A, Cho JK, Sperry L, et al. Cue-induced cocaine craving: neuroanatomical specificity for drug users and drug stimuli. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1789–1798.
    1. Lang PJ, Ohman A, Vaitl D. The International Affective Picture System. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida; 1988.
    1. Pessiglione M, Schmidt L, Draganski B, Kalisch R, Lau H, et al. How the brain translates money into force: a neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation. Science. 2007;316:904–906.
    1. Morris JS, Ohman A, Dolan RJ. A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:1680–1685.
    1. Adams RB, Jr, Gordon HL, Baird AA, Ambady N, Kleck RE. Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science. 2003;300:1536.
    1. Wright P, Liu Y. Neutral faces activate the amygdala during identity matching. Neuroimage. 2006;29:628–636.
    1. Dale AM. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8:109–114.
    1. Greve D. OptSeq. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard University (Mass General); 2002.
    1. Killgore WD, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Sex differences in amygdala activation during the perception of facial affect. Neuroreport. 2001;12:2543–2547.
    1. Killgore WD, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Activation of the amygdala and anterior cingulate during nonconscious processing of sad versus happy faces. Neuroimage. 2004;21:1215–1223.
    1. Hendler T, Rotshtein P, Yeshurun Y, Weizmann T, Kahn I, et al. Sensing the invisible: differential sensitivity of visual cortex and amygdala to traumatic context. Neuroimage. 2003;19:587–600.
    1. Sheline YI, Barch DM, Donnelly JM, Ollinger JM, Snyder AZ, et al. Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: an fMRI study. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50:651–658.
    1. Merikle PM, Smilek D, Eastwood JD. Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition. 2001;79:115–134.
    1. Holender D, Duscherer K. Unconscious perception: the need for a paradigm shift. Percept Psychophys. 2004;66:872–881; discussion 888–895.
    1. Overgaard M, Rote J, Mouridsen K, Ramsoy TZ. Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? A comparison of report methodologies during a visual task. Conscious Cogn. 2006;15:700–708.
    1. Greenwald AG, Draine SC, Abrams RL. Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science. 1996;273:1699–1702.
    1. Murphy ST, Zajonc RB. Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64:723–739.
    1. Fazio RH, Jackson JR, Dunton BC, Williams CJ. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69:1013–1027.
    1. SPM 2. Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience. London, UK: 2002. .

Source: PubMed

Подписаться