An 8 1/2-year clinical experience with surgery for atrial fibrillation

J L Cox, R B Schuessler, D G Lappas, J P Boineau, J L Cox, R B Schuessler, D G Lappas, J P Boineau

Abstract

Objective: The authors analyzed the clinical results during the first 8 1/2 years' experience with the Maze procedure for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Summary background data: Atrial fibrillation occurs in 0.4% to 2% of the general population and in approximately 10% of patients older than 60 years of age. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The irregular heartbeat causes discomfort, the loss of synchronous atrioventricular contraction compromises hemodynamics and the stasis of blood flow increases the vulnerability to thromboembolism.

Methods: From September 25, 1987 to March 1, 1996, 178 patients underwent the Maze procedure. Thirty-two patients underwent the Maze-I procedure, 15 underwent the Maze-II procedure, and 118 underwent the Maze-III procedure. Patients were analyzed for recurrence of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation between 3 months and 8 1/2 years after surgery (n = 164). Patients were analyzed for atrial transport function, sinus nodule function, and postoperative pacemaker requirements.

Results: Ninety-three percent of all patients were arrhythmia free without any antiarrhythmic medication. Of the remaining patients with arrhythmia recurrence, all were converted to sinus rhythm with medical therapy. All patients were documented to have atrial transport function by either direct visualization, transesophageal echocardiography, or atrioventricular versus ventricular pacing at the same rate. Ninety-eight percent had documented right atrial function, and 94% had left atrial function. Of the 107 patients in this series who were documented to have a normal sinus node preoperatively, only 1 patient required a permanent pacemaker.

Conclusion: The Maze procedure is an effective treatment for medically refractory atrial fibrillation in properly selected patients.

References

    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Apr;101(4):584-92
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Apr;101(4):569-83
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Mar;55(3):578-80
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Oct;56(4):814-823; discussion 823-4
    1. Adv Card Surg. 1995;6:1-67
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Aug;110(2):473-84
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Aug;110(2):485-95
    1. JAMA. 1991 Oct 9;266(14):1976-80
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Sep;80(3):373-80
    1. JAMA. 1982 Aug 20;248(7):851-5
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1983 May 1;51(8):1375-8
    1. Minerva Med. 1983 May 19;74(21):1313-8
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1984 Sep;144(9):1758-60
    1. Eur Heart J. 1984 Jul;5(7):592-6
    1. Age Ageing. 1986 Mar;15(2):89-92
    1. Eur Heart J. 1987 May;8(5):521-7
    1. Eur Heart J. 1987 Aug;8 Suppl D:17-9
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Apr 1;61(10):714-7
    1. Heart Vessels Suppl. 1987;2:14-23
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Aug;46(2):223-31
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Aug;46(2):232-5
    1. Lancet. 1989 Jan 28;1(8631):175-9
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Mar;101(3):402-5
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Mar;101(3):406-26

Source: PubMed

Подписаться