Functional Connectivity Changes in Resting-State EEG as Potential Biomarker for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Parameswaran Mahadeva Iyer, Catriona Egan, Marta Pinto-Grau, Tom Burke, Marwa Elamin, Bahman Nasseroleslami, Niall Pender, Edmund C Lalor, Orla Hardiman, Parameswaran Mahadeva Iyer, Catriona Egan, Marta Pinto-Grau, Tom Burke, Marwa Elamin, Bahman Nasseroleslami, Niall Pender, Edmund C Lalor, Orla Hardiman

Abstract

Background: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is heterogeneous and overlaps with frontotemporal dementia. Spectral EEG can predict damage in structural and functional networks in frontotemporal dementia but has never been applied to ALS.

Methods: 18 incident ALS patients with normal cognition and 17 age matched controls underwent 128 channel EEG and neuropsychology assessment. The EEG data was analyzed using FieldTrip software in MATLAB to calculate simple connectivity measures and scalp network measures. sLORETA was used in nodal analysis for source localization and same methods were applied as above to calculate nodal network measures. Graph theory measures were used to assess network integrity.

Results: Cross spectral density in alpha band was higher in patients. In ALS patients, increased degree values of the network nodes was noted in the central and frontal regions in the theta band across seven of the different connectivity maps (p<0.0005). Among patients, clustering coefficient in alpha and gamma bands was increased in all regions of the scalp and connectivity were significantly increased (p=0.02). Nodal network showed increased assortativity in alpha band in the patients group. The Clustering Coefficient in Partial Directed Connectivity (PDC) showed significantly higher values for patients in alpha, beta, gamma, theta and delta frequencies (p=0.05).

Discussion: There is increased connectivity in the fronto-central regions of the scalp and areas corresponding to Salience and Default Mode network in ALS, suggesting a pathologic disruption of neuronal networking in early disease states. Spectral EEG has potential utility as a biomarker in ALS.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Prof. Orla Hardiman has received speaking honorarium from Janssen Cilag, Biogen Idec, Sanofi Aventis, Novartis and Merck-Serono. She has also been a member of advisory panels for Biogen Idec, Allergen, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Cytokinetics and Sanofi Aventis. She serves as Editor-in-Chief of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia, and has received funding from Health Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no: 259867, ALSA (the ALS Association), HRB (the Health Research Board, grant H01300), Joint Programme in Neurodegeneration (JPND), The Trinity College Colm Murray Fellowship and Research Motor Neuron (previously named Motor Neuron Disease Research Foundation). The other authors have no financial support to declare.

Figures

Fig 1. Methods Flow Chart.
Fig 1. Methods Flow Chart.
Flowchart of methods explaining the preprocessing and two stage processing for scalp connectivity and nodal connectivity.
Fig 2. Scalp network connectivity.
Fig 2. Scalp network connectivity.
Shows difference in clustering coefficients between patients (green) and controls (orange) in different scalp regions. (F = Frontal, C = Central, P = Parietal O = Occipital) (D = Delta, T = Theta, A = Alpha L = Low, H = High).
Fig 3. Nodal connectivity.
Fig 3. Nodal connectivity.
Statistically significant differences in nodal connectivity (Directed Transfer Function) between patients and controls in various frequency bands.
Fig 4. Aggregated nodal network connectivity.
Fig 4. Aggregated nodal network connectivity.
Assortativity of Partial Directed Coherence, showing differences between patients (Yellow) and controls (Green) with p = 0.0032 for Alpha range (Delta p = 0.74, theta p = 0.26, beta p = 0.46, gamma p = 0.47).
Fig 5. Non-aggregated nodal network connectivity.
Fig 5. Non-aggregated nodal network connectivity.
Clustering coefficient of PDC values in nodal analysis for beta band for patients (green) and controls (orange).
Fig 6. The distribution of clustering coefficient…
Fig 6. The distribution of clustering coefficient of PDC in beta band as a box-plot in patients vs. controls, showing the median and interquartile range.

References

    1. Kiernan MC, Vucic S, Cheah BC, Turner MR, Eisen A, Hardiman O, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):942–55. Epub 2011/02/08. 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61156-7 .
    1. Elamin M, Phukan J, Bede P, Jordan N, Byrne S, Pender N, et al. Executive dysfunction is a negative prognostic indicator in patients with ALS without dementia. Neurology. 2011;76(14):1263–9. Epub 2011/04/06. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318214359f .
    1. Phukan J, Elamin M, Bede P, Jordan N, Gallagher L, Byrne S, et al. The syndrome of cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2012;83(1):102–8. Epub 2011/08/13. 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300188 .
    1. Byrne S, Elamin M, Bede P, Shatunov A, Walsh C, Corr B, et al. Cognitive and clinical characteristics of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis carrying a C9orf72 repeat expansion: a population-based cohort study. Lancet neurology. 2012;11(3):232–40. Epub 2012/02/07. 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70014-5 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3315021.
    1. Furtula J, Johnsen B, Christensen PB, Pugdahl K, Bisgaard C, Christensen MK, et al. MUNIX and incremental stimulation MUNE in ALS patients and control subjects. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2013;124(3):610–8. Epub 2012/10/09. 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.08.023 .
    1. Bullmore E, Sporns O. The economy of brain network organization. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2012;13(5):336–49. Epub 2012/04/14. 10.1038/nrn3214 .
    1. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage. 2010;52(3):1059–69. Epub 2009/10/13. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 .
    1. Menon V, Uddin LQ. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain structure & function. 2010;214(5–6):655–67. Epub 2010/06/01. 10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2899886.
    1. Agosta F, Pagani E, Rocca MA, Caputo D, Perini M, Salvi F, et al. Voxel-based morphometry study of brain volumetry and diffusivity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients with mild disability. Human brain mapping. 2007;28(12):1430–8. Epub 2007/03/21. 10.1002/hbm.20364 .
    1. Kollewe K, Korner S, Dengler R, Petri S, Mohammadi B. Magnetic resonance imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology research international. 2012;2012:608501 Epub 2012/08/01. 10.1155/2012/608501 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3400399.
    1. Knyazeva MG, Jalili M, Brioschi A, Bourquin I, Fornari E, Hasler M, et al. Topography of EEG multivariate phase synchronization in early Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiology of aging. 2010;31(7):1132–44. Epub 2008/09/09. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.07.019 .
    1. Harris CM. The Fourier analysis of biological transients. Journal of neuroscience methods. 1998;83(1):15–34. Epub 1998/10/09. .
    1. de Haan W, Pijnenburg YA, Strijers RL, van der Made Y, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, et al. Functional neural network analysis in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using EEG and graph theory. BMC neuroscience. 2009;10:101 Epub 2009/08/25. 10.1186/1471-2202-10-101 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2736175.
    1. Lo CY, He Y, Lin CP. Graph theoretical analysis of human brain structural networks. Reviews in the neurosciences. 2011;22(5):551–63. Epub 2011/08/25. 10.1515/rns.2011.039 .
    1. Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly RB. FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2010;192(1):152–62. Epub 2010/07/27. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.07.015 .
    1. Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10(3):186–98. Epub 2009/02/05. 10.1038/nrn2575 .
    1. Kerr A, Chesnutt C, Akrofi K, Baker MC. Data-driven Connectivity Changes in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease.
    1. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational intelligence and neuroscience. 2011;2011:156869 Epub 2011/01/22. 10.1155/2011/156869 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3021840.
    1. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1994;18(1):49–65. 10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-X
    1. Evans AC, Collins DL, Mills SR, Brown ED, Kelly RL, Peters TM. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record1993. p. 1813–7 vol.3.
    1. Fawcett T. ROC graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers. Machine learning. 2004;31:1–38.
    1. Brettschneider J, Del Tredici K, Toledo JB, Robinson JL, Irwin DJ, Grossman M, et al. Stages of pTDP-43 pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annals of neurology. 2013;74(1):20–38. Epub 2013/05/21. 10.1002/ana.23937 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3785076.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться