Effect of EMG-biofeedback robotic-assisted body weight supported treadmill training on walking ability and cardiopulmonary function on people with subacute spinal cord injuries - a randomized controlled trial

Eddy Yu Yeung Cheung, Kevin Ka Ki Yu, Rachel Lai Chu Kwan, Carmen Ka Man Ng, Rosanna Mei Wa Chau, Gladys Lai Ying Cheing, Eddy Yu Yeung Cheung, Kevin Ka Ki Yu, Rachel Lai Chu Kwan, Carmen Ka Man Ng, Rosanna Mei Wa Chau, Gladys Lai Ying Cheing

Abstract

Background: Body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) is a frequently used approach for restoring the ability to walk after spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the duration of BWSTT is usually limited by fatigue of the therapists and patients. Robotic-assisted body weight supported treadmill training (RABWSTT) was developed to tackle the aforesaid limitation. Currently, limited randomized controlled trials are available to investigate its effectiveness, especially on cardiopulmonary function. The aim of this two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial is to examine the feasibility of adapting an EMG-biofeedback system for assist-as-needed RABWSTT and its effects on walking and cardiopulmonary function in people with SCI.

Methods: Sixteen incomplete SCI subjects were recruited and randomly allocated into an intervention group or control group. The intervention group received 30 min of RABWSTT with EMG biofeedback system over the vastus lateralis muscle to enhance active participation. Dose equivalent passive lower limbs mobilization exercise was provided to subjects in the control group.

Results: Significant time-group interaction was found in the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury version II (WISCI II) (p = 0.020), Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III) mobility sub-score (p < 0.001), bilateral symmetry (p = 0.048), maximal oxygen consumption (p = 0.014) and peak expiratory flow rate (p = 0.048). Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that the intervention group had significant improvement in the above-mentioned outcomes after the intervention except WISCI II, which also yielded marginal significance level.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the use of EMG-biofeedback RABWSTT enhanced the walking performance for SCI subjects and improve cardiopulmonary function. Positive outcomes reflect that RABSTT training may be able to enhance their physical fitness.

Trial registration: The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (Kowloon Central/ Kowloon East), Hospital Authority on 6 December 2013, and the Human Subjects Ethics Sub-committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University on 15 May 2013, with reference numbers KC/KC-13-0181/ER-2 and HSEARS20130510002 respectively. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 20 November 2013, with reference number NCT01989806 .).

Keywords: Independence; Locomotion; Oxygen consumption.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of the study

References

    1. Ungerleider LG, Doyon J, Karni A. Imaging brain plasticity during motor skill learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;78:553–564. doi: 10.1006/nlme.2002.4091.
    1. Alcobendas-Maestro M, Esclarín-Ruz A, Casado-López RM, Muñoz-González A, Pérez-Mateos G, González-Valdizán E, et al. Lokomat robotic-assisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:1058–1063. doi: 10.1177/1545968312448232.
    1. Esclarín-Ruz A, Alcobendas-Maestro M, Casado-Lopez R, Perez-Mateos G, Florido-Sanchez MA, Gonzalez-Valdizan E, et al. A comparison of robotic walking therapy and conventional walking therapy in individuals with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1023–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.017.
    1. Niu X, Varoqui D, Kindig M, Mirbagheri MM. Prediction of gait recovery in spinal cord injured individuals trained with robotic gait orthosis. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2014;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-42.
    1. Field-Fote EC, Lindley SD, Sherman AL. Locomotor training approaches for individuals with spinal cord injury: a preliminary report of walking-related outcomes. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29:127–137. doi: 10.1097/01.NPT.0000282245.31158.09.
    1. Field-Fote EC, Roach KE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2011;91:48–60. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090359.
    1. Kressler J, Nash MS, Burns PA, Field-Fote EC. Metabolic responses to 4 different body weight-supported locomotor training approaches in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1436–1442. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.018.
    1. Nooijen CF, Ter Hoeve N, Field-Fote EC. Gait quality is improved by locomotor training in individuals with SCI regardless of training approach. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2009;6:36. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-36.
    1. Evans N, Hartigan C, Kandilakis C, Pharo E, Clesson I. Acute cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses during exoskeleton-assisted walking overground among persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. 2015;21:122–132. doi: 10.1310/sci2102-122.
    1. Hornby G, Campbell D, Zemon D, Kahn J. Clinical and quantitative evaluation of robotic-assisted treadmill walking to retrain ambulation after spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2005;11:1–17. doi: 10.1310/14Q9-AD7M-FXX9-1G2J.
    1. Burns AS, Delparte JJ, Patrick M, Marino RJ, Ditunno JF. The reproducibility and convergent validity of the walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI) in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:149–157. doi: 10.1177/1545968310376756.
    1. Catz A, Itzkovich M. Spinal cord Independence measure: comprehensive ability rating scale for the spinal cord lesion patient. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:65. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.07.0123.
    1. Maynard FM, Bracken MB, Creasey GJFD, Ditunno JF, Donovan WH, Ducker TB, et al. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:266–274. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100432.
    1. Robergs RA, Landwehr R. The surprising history of the" HRmax= 220-age" equation. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online. 2002;5:1–10.
    1. Fleerkotte BM, Koopman B, Buurke JH, van Asseldonk EH, van der Kooij H, Rietman JS. The effect of impedance-controlled robotic gait training on walking ability and quality in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: an explorative study. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2014;11:26. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-26.
    1. Kim CM, Eng JJ, Whittaker MW. Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:156–162. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101569.
    1. Behrman AL, Bowden MG, Nair PM. Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: an emerging paradigm shift in rehabilitation and walking recovery. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1406–1425. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050212.
    1. Hurd WW, Pegram V, Nepomuceno C. Comparison of actual and simulated EMG biofeedback in the treatment of hemiplegic patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 1980;59:73–82.
    1. Stanton R, Ada L, Dean CM, Preston E. Biofeedback improves activities of the lower limb after stroke: a systematic review. J Phys. 2011;57:145–155.
    1. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2005;13:33–39. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843173.
    1. Jezernik S, Schärer R, Colombo G, Morari M. Adaptive robotic rehabilitation of locomotion: a clinical study in spinally injured individuals. Spinal Cord. 2003;41:657–666. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101518.
    1. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36:212–224. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224.
    1. Winchester P, McColl R, Querry R, Foreman N, Mosby J, Tansey K, et al. Changes in supraspinal activation patterns following robotic locomotor therapy in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:313–324. doi: 10.1177/1545968305281515.
    1. Varoqui D, Niu X, Mirbagheri MM. Ankle voluntary movement enhancement following robotic-assisted locomotor training in spinal cord injury. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2014;11:46. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-46.
    1. Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH, Lammertse D, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:190. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102007.
    1. Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic-and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1466–1478. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050266.
    1. Braun NM, Arora NS, Rochester DF. Respiratory muscle and pulmonary function in polymyositis and other proximal myopathies. Thorax. 1983;38:616–623. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.8.616.
    1. Gorman PH, Scott W, York H, Theyagaraj M, Price-Miller N, McQuaid J, et al. Robotically assisted treadmill exercise training for improving peak fitness in chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2016;39:32–44. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000281.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться