Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces

Ian D Stephen, Miriam J Law Smith, Michael R Stirrat, David I Perrett, Ian D Stephen, Miriam J Law Smith, Michael R Stirrat, David I Perrett

Abstract

Numerous researchers have examined the effects of skin condition, including texture and color, on the perception of health, age, and attractiveness in human faces. They have focused on facial color distribution, homogeneity of pigmentation, or skin quality. We here investigate the role of overall skin color in determining perceptions of health from faces by allowing participants to manipulate the skin portions of color-calibrated Caucasian face photographs along CIELab color axes. To enhance healthy appearance, participants increased skin redness (a*), providing additional support for previous findings that skin blood color enhances the healthy appearance of faces. Participants also increased skin yellowness (b*) and lightness (L*), suggesting a role for high carotenoid and low melanin coloration in the healthy appearance of faces. The color preferences described here resemble the red and yellow color cues to health displayed by many species of nonhuman animals.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(a) Original facial image and endpoint images of the redness transform showing images with increased (top) and decreased (bottom) redness (±16 units of a*) in lips changing (left) and constant (right) conditions. (b) For the range of color-calibrated face colors presented, participants increased redness (a*) to optimize healthy appearance, particularly in male faces. Solid rectangles and regression line (R2 = 0.87) represent female faces. Hollow rhombi and dashed regression line (R2 = 0.86) represent male faces.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Original facial image and endpoint images of the yellowness transform showing images with increased (top) and decreased (bottom) yellowness (±16 units of b*) in lips changing (left) and constant (right) conditions. (b) For the range of color-calibrated face colors presented, participants increase yellowness (b*) to optimize healthy appearance, particularly in male faces. Solid rectangles and regression line (R2 = 0.22) represent female faces. Hollow rhombi and dashed regression line (R2 = 0.80) represent male faces. (c) Participants increase yellowness more when the lips change color along with the rest of the facial skin than when the lips remain constant. Solid rhombi and regression line (R2 = 0.55) represent faces in the lips changing condition. Hollow rectangles and dashed regression line (R2 = 0.50) represent faces in the lips constant condition.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Original facial image and endpoint images of the lightness transform showing images with increased (top) and decreased (bottom) lightness (±16 units of L*) in lips changing (left) and constant (right) conditions. (b) For the range of color-calibrated face colors presented, participants increased lightness (L*) to optimize healthy appearance, particularly in female faces. Solid rectangles and regression line (R2 = 0.73) represent female faces. Hollow rhombi and dashed regression line (R2 = 0.59) represent male faces.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) Endpoints of the two-dimensional L* vs. b* transform. (b) For the range of color-calibrated face colors presented, participants increase both yellowness and lightness to optimize healthy appearance.

References

    1. Alaluf S, Heinrich U, Stahl W, Tronnier H, Wiseman S. Dietary carotenoids contribute to normal human skin color and UV photosensitivity. Journal of Nutrition. 2002;132:399–403.
    1. Alexander M, Newmark H, Miller RG. Oral β-carotene can increase the number of OKT4+ cells in human blood. Immunology Letters. 1985;9:221–224. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(85)90036-7.
    1. Aoki K. Sexual selection as a cause of human skin color variation: Darwin’s hypothesis revisited. Annals of Human Biology. 2002;29:589–608. doi: 10.1080/0301446021000019144.
    1. Armstrong N, Welsman JR. Peak oxygen uptake in relation to growth and maturation in 11- to 17-year-old humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2001;85:546–551. doi: 10.1007/s004210100485.
    1. Boman HG, Hultmark D. Cell-free immunity in insects. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1987;41:103–126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.000535.
    1. Burkhart CG, Burkhart CN. The mole theory: Primary function of melanocytes and melanin may be antimicrobial defense and immunomodulation (not solar protection) International Journal of Dermatology. 2005;44:340–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02556.x.
    1. Burt DM, Perrett DI. Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: Computer graphic manipulation of shape and color information. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 1995;259:137–143. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0021.
    1. Charkoudian N. Skin blood flow in adult human thermoregulation: How it works, when it does not, and why. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2003;78:603–612. doi: 10.4065/78.5.603.
    1. Charkoudian N, Stephens DP, Pirkle KC, Kosiba WA, Johnson JM. Influence of female reproductive hormones on local thermal control of skin blood flow. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1999;87:1719–1723.
    1. Chew BP. Effects of supplemental β-carotene and vitamin A on reproduction in swine. Journal of Animal Science. 1993;71:247–252.
    1. Czaja JA, Pobinson JA, Eisele SG, Scheffler G, Goy RW. Relationship between sexual skin color of female rhesus monkeys and midcycle plasma levels of oestradiol and progesterone. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1977;49:147–150.
    1. Dixson AF. Observations on the evolution and behavioral significance of “sexual skin” in female primates. Advances in the Study of Behavior. 1983;13:63–106. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60286-7.
    1. Dixson AF. Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes and human beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Edwards EA, Duntley SQ. The pigments and color of living human skin. American Journal of Anatomy. 1939;65:1–33. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000650102.
    1. Eley, C. (1991). Status signaling in the western greenfinch (Carduelis chloris). Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.
    1. Feinmann S, Gill GW. Sex differences in physical attractiveness preferences. Journal of Social Psychology. 1978;105:43–52.
    1. Fink B, Grammer K, Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2001;115:92–99. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.92.
    1. Fink B, Grammer K, Matts PJ. Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2006;27:433–442. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.08.007.
    1. Folstad I, Karter AJ. Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence hypothesis. American Naturalist. 1992;139:603–622. doi: 10.1086/285346.
    1. Friis H, Gomo E, Kastel P, Ndhlovu P, Nyazema N, et al. HIV and other predictors of serum β-carotene and retinol in pregnancy: A cross-sectional study in Zimbabwe. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2001;73:1058–1065.
    1. Frost P. Preference for darker faces in photographs at different phases of the menstrual cycle: Preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1994;79:507–514.
    1. Hong G, Luo MR, Rhodes PA. A study of digital camera colorimetric characterization based on polynomial modeling. Color Research & Application. 2001;26:76–84. doi: 10.1002/1520-6378(200102)26:1<76::AID-COL8>;2-3.
    1. Hulse FS. Selection for skin color among the Japanese. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1967;27:143–156. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330270205.
    1. Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. The evolution of human skin color. Journal of Human Evolution. 2000;39:57–106. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0403.
    1. Johnson JM. Physical training and the control of skin blood flow. Medical Science in Sports and Exercise. 1998;30:382–386.
    1. Jones D. Physical attractiveness, race and somatic prejudice in Bahia, Brazil. In: Cronk L, Chagnon N, Irons W, editors. Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective. Edison, NJ: Aldine Transaction; 2000. pp. 133–152.
    1. Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI. When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception. 2004;33:569–576. doi: 10.1068/p3463.
    1. Langlois JH, Roggman LA. Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science. 1990;1:115–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x.
    1. MacDougall AK, Montgomerie R. Assortative mating by carotenoid-based plumage color: A quality indicator in American goldfinches, Carduelis tristis. Naturwissenschaften. 2003;90:464–467. doi: 10.1007/s00114-003-0459-7.
    1. Martinkauppi B. Face color under varying illumination—analysis and applications. Oulu: Oulu University Press; 2002.
    1. Massaro M, Davis L, Darby J. Carotenoid-derived ornaments reflect parental quality in male and female yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes) Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2003;55:169–175. doi: 10.1007/s00265-003-0683-3.
    1. Matts PJ, Fink B, Grammer K, Burquest M. Color homogeneity and visual perception of age, health, and attractiveness of female facial skin. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2007;57:977–984. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.07.040.
    1. Murray FG. Pigmentation, sunlight and nutritional disease. American Anthropologist. 1934;36:438–448. doi: 10.1525/aa.1934.36.3.02a00100.
    1. Omaye DT. Nutrient deficiencies and pregnancy outcome. In: Sharma RP, editor. Dietary factors and birth defects. San Francisco: Pacific Division AAAS; 1993. pp. 12–41.
    1. Panza JA, Quyyimi AA, Brush JR, Epstein SE. Abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;323:22–27.
    1. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak IS, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998;394:884–887. doi: 10.1038/29772.
    1. Perrett DI, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Lee KJ, Rowland DA, Edwards R. Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1999;20:295–307. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00014-8.
    1. Ponsonby A-L, Dwyer T, Couper D. Sleeping position, infant apnea, and cyanosis: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 1997;99:e3. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.1.e3.
    1. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology. 2006;57:199–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.
    1. Rhodes L, Argersinger ME, Gantert LT, Friscino BH, Hom G, et al. Effects of administration of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, estrogen and fadrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, on sex skin color in intact male rhesus macaques. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1997;111:51–57.
    1. Rhodes G, Sumich A, Byatt G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science. 1999;10:52–58. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00106.
    1. Robins AH. Biological perspectives on human pigmentation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
    1. Russell R. Sex, beauty and the relative luminance of facial features. Perception. 2003;32:1093–1107. doi: 10.1068/p5101.
    1. Saks L, Ots I, Horak P. Carotenoid-based plumage coloration of male greenfinches reflects health and immunocompetence. Oecologia. 2003;134:301–307.
    1. Schweigert FJ, Steinhagen B, Raila J, Siemann A, Peet D, Buscher U. Concentrations of carotenoids, retinol and {alpha}-tocopherol in plasma and follicular fluid of women undergoing IVF. Human Reproduction. 2003;18:1259–1264. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg249.
    1. Setchell JM. Do female mandrills prefer brightly colored males? International Journal of Primatology. 2005;26:715–735. doi: 10.1007/s10764-005-5305-7.
    1. Setchell JM, Dixson AF. Changes in the secondary sexual adornments of male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) are associated with gain and loss of alpha status. Hormones and Behavior. 2001;39:177–184. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1628.
    1. Setchell JM, Wickings EJ. Dominance, status signals and coloration in male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) Ethology. 2005;111:25–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01054.x.
    1. Setchell JM, Wickings EJ, Knapp LA. Signal content of red facial coloration in female mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 2006;273:2395–2400. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3573.
    1. Setchell, J. M., Charpentier, M. J. E., Abbott, K. M., Wickings, E. J., & Knapp, L. A. (2009). Is brightest best? Testing the Hamilton-Zuk hypothesis in Mandrills. International Journal of Primatology, 30. doi:10.1007/s10764-009-9371-0.
    1. Stahl W, Heinrich U, Jungmann H, von Laar J, Schietzel M, et al. Increased dermal carotenoid levels assessed by noninvasive reflection spectrophotometry correlate with serum levels in women ingesting Betatene. Journal of Nutrition. 1998;128:903–907.
    1. Stamatas GN, Zmudzka BZ, Kollias N, Beer JZ. Non-Invasive measurements of skin pigmentation in situ. Pigment Cell Research. 2004;17:618–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.2004.00204.x.
    1. Stephen ID, Coetzee V, Law Smith MJ, Perrett DI. Skin blood perfusion and oxygenation color affect perceived human health. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005083.
    1. Thornton MJ. The biological actions of estrogens on skin. Experimental Dermatology. 2002;11:487–502. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2002.110601.x.
    1. van den Berghe PL, Frost P. Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene-culture coevolution? Ethnic and Racial Studies. 1986;9:87–119.
    1. Wagatsuma H. The social perception of skin color in Japan. In: Franklin JH, editor. Color and race. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1968.
    1. Waitt C, Little AC, Wolfensohn S, Honess P, Brown AP, et al. Evidence from rhesus macaques suggests that male coloration plays a role in female primate mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 2003;270:S144–S146. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0065.
    1. Waitt C, Gerald MS, Little AC, Kraiselburd E. Selective attention toward female secondary sexual color in male rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology. 2006;68:738–744. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20264.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться