Three-dimensional gait analysis can shed new light on walking in patients with haemophilia

Sébastien Lobet, Christine Detrembleur, Firas Massaad, Cedric Hermans, Sébastien Lobet, Christine Detrembleur, Firas Massaad, Cedric Hermans

Abstract

In patients with haemophilia (PWH) (from Greek "blood love"), the long-term consequences of repeated haemarthrosis include cartilage damage and irreversible arthropathy, resulting in severe impairments in locomotion. Quantifying the extent of joint damage is therefore important in order to prevent disease progression and compare the efficacy of treatment strategies. Musculoskeletal impairments in PWH may stem from structural and functional abnormalities, which have traditionally been evaluated radiologically or clinically. However, these examinations are performed in a supine position (i.e., non-weight-bearing condition). We therefore suggest three-dimensional gait analysis (3DGA) as an innovative approach designed to focus on the functional component of the joint during the act of walking. This is of the utmost importance, as pain induced by weight-bearing activities influences the functional performance of the arthropathic joints significantly. This review endeavors to improve our knowledge of the biomechanical consequences of multiple arthropathies on gait pattern in adult patients with haemophilia using 3DGA. In PWH with arthropathy, the more the joint function was altered, the more the metabolic energy was consumed. 3DGA analysis could highlight the effect of an orthopedic disorder in PWH during walking. Indeed, mechanical and metabolic impairments were correlated to the progressive loss of active mobility into the joints.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The infrared cameras (a) are positioned so that at least two visualize each reflective marker at any given time. From the reflective markers movements we can calculate the 3D trajectories of the body segments (b). The images are then processed to derive the graphs of the kinematics, that is, the joint range of movement of each lower limb joint (c). A force platform located under the treadmill (b) records the patient's ground reaction forces. The joint moments and powers, that is, kinetic data, (d) are derived from force platform measurements and kinematic data. Energy expenditure is measured indirectly based on the rate of oxygen consumption by the patient using an ergospirometer (e). Finally, the mechanical work is calculated as the work performed by muscles to raise and accelerate the center of body mass (external mechanical work) and to move the body segments relative to the center of body mass (internal mechanical work) (f).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Inverted pendulum model of gait, showing how the center of body mass (CoM) rises during the single support and falls during the double support.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Net metabolic cost in 31 patients with haemophilia as a function of spontaneous walking speed. The severity of joint impairment is arbitrarily classified as “mild” (green symbol, uni/bilateral ankle arthropathy, n = 10), “moderate” (pink symbol, uni/bilateral ankle arthropathy + unilateral knee arthropathy/total knee replacement, n = 10), and “severe” (brown symbol, at least bilateral knee arthropathy/total knee replacement, n = 11).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Net metabolic cost in 31 patients with haemophilia as a function of the total ROM at ankles, knees, and hips levels. The dynamic ROM of the hip, knee, and ankle was calculated as follows: ankle: A3-A2 (A3-maximum plantar flexion at pushoff; A2-maximum dorsiflexion in stance); knee: K4-K3 (K4-maximum flexion in swing; K3-maximum extension at preswing); hip: H2-H1 (H2-maximum extension in stance; H1-flexion at initial contact). The ROM of lower limb joints were calculated for both sides and then summed. r = Pearson product moment correlation.

References

    1. Arnold WD, Hilgartner MW. Hemophilic arthropathy. Current concepts of pathogenesis and management. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A. 1977;59(3):287–305.
    1. Gilbert MS. Prophylaxis: musculoskeletal evaluation. Seminars in Hematology. 1993;30(3, supplement 2):3–6.
    1. Hilliard P, Funk S, Zourikins N, et al. Hemophilia joint health score reliability study. Haemophilia. 2006;12(5):518–525.
    1. Lundin B, Babyn P, Doria AS, et al. Compatible scales for progresssive and additive MRI assessments of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2005;11(2):109–115.
    1. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1980;NO 149:153–159.
    1. Silva M, Luck JV, Jr., Quon D, et al. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of radiographic scores commonly used for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2008;14(3):504–512.
    1. Waters RL, Mulroy S. The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. Gait and Posture. 1999;9(3):207–231.
    1. Inman VT. Conservation of energy in ambulation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1967;48(9):484–488.
    1. Willems PA, Cavagna GA, Heglund NC. External, internal and total work in human locomotion. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1995;198(part 2):379–393.
    1. Saunders JB, Inman VT, Eberhart HD. The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. 1953;35(3):543–558.
    1. Cavagna GA, Kaneko M. Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. Journal of Physiology. 1977;268(2):467–481.
    1. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad K, Stuck R, Matters M. Theoretical model and rasch analysis to develop a revised foot function index. Foot and Ankle International. 2006;27(7):519–527.
    1. Lobet S, Hermans C, Pasta G, Detrembleur C. Body structure versus body function in haemophilia: the case of haemophilic ankle arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2011;17(3):508–515.
    1. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.
    1. Lobet S, Detrembleur C, Francq B, Hermans C. Natural progression of blood-induced joint damage in patients with haemophilia: clinical relevance and reproducibility of three-dimensional gait analysis. Haemophilia. 2010;16(5):813–821.
    1. Lobet S, Detrembleur C, Hermans C. Impact of multiple joint impairments on the energetics and mechanics of walking in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013;19(2):e66–e72.
    1. Heglund NC, Willems PA, Penta M, Cavagna GA. Energy-saving gait mechanics with head-supported loads. Nature. 1995;375(6526):52–54.
    1. Massaad F, Lejeune TM, Detrembleur C. The up and down bobbing of human walking: a compromise between muscle work and efficiency. Journal of Physiology. 2007;582(2):789–799.
    1. Massaad F, Lejeune TM, Detrembleur C. Why do we bob up and down while walking? The mystery of Antiquity walking shadow finally deciphered. Physiology News. 2008;71:25–28.
    1. Saunders JB, Inman VT, Eberhart HD. The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1953;35(3):543–558.
    1. Della CU, Riley PO, Lelas JL, Kerrigan DC. A refined view of the determinants of gait. Gait and Posture. 2001;14(2):79–84.
    1. Lobet S, Hermans C, Bastien GJ, Massaad F, Detrembleur C. Impact of ankle osteoarthritis on the energetics and mechanics of gait: the case of hemophilic arthropathy. Clinical Biomechanics. 2012;27(6):625–631.
    1. Lobet S, Pendeville E, Dalzell R, et al. The role of physiotherapy after total knee arthroplasty in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2008;14(5):989–998.
    1. Lobet S, Detrembleur C, Lantin AC, Haenecour L, Hermans C. Functional impact of custom-made foot orthoses in patients with haemophilic ankle arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2012;18(3):e227–e235.
    1. Stephensen D, Drechsler W, Scott O. Comparison of muscle strength and in-vivo muscle morphology in young children with haemophilia and those of age-matched peers. Haemophilia. 2012;18(3):e302–e310.
    1. Seuser A, Boehm P, Kurme A, Schumpe G, Kurnik K. Orthopaedic issues in sports for persons with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2007;13(2):47–52.
    1. Stephensen D, Drechsler W, Winter M, Scott O. Comparison of biomechanical gait parameters of young children with haemophilia and those of age-matched peers. Haemophilia. 2009;15(2):509–518.
    1. Groen W, van der NJ, Bos K, Abad A, Bergstrom BM, Blanchette VS, et al. Joint health and functional ability in children with haemophilia who receive intensive replacement therapy. Haemophilia. 2011;17(5):783–790.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться