Reduction effect of oral pravastatin on the acute phase response to intravenous zoledronic acid: protocol for a real-world prospective, placebo-controlled trial

Qi Liu, Gengyu Han, Runting Li, Dongwei Fan, Guohong Du, Min Zhang, Liyuan Tao, Haiyan Li, Dongyang Liu, Chunli Song, Qi Liu, Gengyu Han, Runting Li, Dongwei Fan, Guohong Du, Min Zhang, Liyuan Tao, Haiyan Li, Dongyang Liu, Chunli Song

Abstract

Introduction: Zoledronic acid (ZA) has been used as a first-line treatment in patients with osteoporosis (OP) who receive an annual injection of 5 mg. However, side effects of bone pain and fever, known as the acute phase response (APR), have often been observed after clinical usage. A meta-analysis reported that the incidence of APR was 49.4% among patients with OP who received ZA for the first time and that 30% of patients with these adverse effects refused treatment in the following year. As a clinically used hypolipidaemic drug, statins can inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase to block the pathway upstream of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase. This process can decrease the accumulation of isopentenyl pyrophosphate to prevent γδT-cell activation and inflammatory factor production, blocking APR occurrence. The aim of this study is to determine the reduction effect of oral pravastatin on APR and investigate the possible mechanisms underlying the effect in vivo.

Methods and analysis: This will be a single-centre, placebo-controlled trial. Female participants will be allocated at a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral pravastatin or a placebo at 1-hour predose and 24 and 48 hours post-administration of ZA. The primary outcome will be the incidence of APR within 72 hours after ZA infusion. The secondary outcomes will include the occurrence time and severity of APR and the frequency and amount of acetaminophen usage within 72 hours after ZA infusion. This study will determine the preventive effect of oral pravastatin on APR in Chinese patients with OP, supporting the clinical application of ZA to alleviate concerns regarding safety and increase patient compliance.

Ethics and dissemination: This study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee. The results will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: NCT04719481.

Keywords: bone diseases; clinical trials; protocols & guidelines.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study. APR, acute phase response.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Information on the schedule of screening, enrolment, interventions and assessments. BMD, bone mineral density; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale.

References

    1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy . Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001;285:785–95. 10.1001/jama.285.6.785
    1. Si L, Winzenberg TM, Jiang Q, et al. . Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China: 2010-2050. Osteoporos Int 2015;26:1929–37. 10.1007/s00198-015-3093-2
    1. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. . Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2014;25:2359–81. 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2
    1. Srivastava T, Haney CJ, Alon US. Atorvastatin may have no effect on acute phase reaction in children after intravenous bisphosphonate infusion. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:334–7. 10.1359/jbmr.081016
    1. Makras P, Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, et al. . No effect of rosuvastatin in the zoledronate-induced acute-phase response. Calcif Tissue Int 2011;88:402–8. 10.1007/s00223-011-9468-2
    1. Olson K, Van Poznak C. Significance and impact of bisphosphonate-induced acute phase responses. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2007;13:223–9. 10.1177/1078155207080806
    1. Silverman SL, Kriegman A, Goncalves J, et al. . Effect of acetaminophen and fluvastatin on post-dose symptoms following infusion of zoledronic acid. Osteoporos Int 2011;22:2337–45. 10.1007/s00198-010-1448-2
    1. Sieber P, Lardelli P, Kraenzlin CA, et al. . Intravenous bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis: safety profiles of zoledronic acid and ibandronate in clinical practice. Clin Drug Investig 2013;33:117–22. 10.1007/s40261-012-0041-1
    1. Popp AW, Senn R, Curkovic I, et al. . Factors associated with acute-phase response of bisphosphonate-naïve or pretreated women with osteoporosis receiving an intravenous first dose of zoledronate or ibandronate. Osteoporos Int 2017;28:1995–2002. 10.1007/s00198-017-3992-5
    1. Reid IR, Gamble GD, Mesenbrink P, et al. . Characterization of and risk factors for the acute-phase response after zoledronic acid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:4380–7. 10.1210/jc.2010-0597
    1. Ding Y, Zeng J-C, Yin F, et al. . Multicenter Study on Observation of Acute-phase Responses After Infusion of Zoledronic Acid 5 mg in Chinese Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Orthop Surg 2017;9:284–9. 10.1111/os.12338
    1. Saag K, Lindsay R, Kriegman A, et al. . A single zoledronic acid infusion reduces bone resorption markers more rapidly than Weekly oral alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. Bone 2007;40:1238–43. 10.1016/j.bone.2007.01.016
    1. Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, Makras P, et al. . Acute phase response following intravenous zoledronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Bone 2012;50:1130–4. 10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.006
    1. Hewitt RE, Lissina A, Green AE, et al. . The bisphosphonate acute phase response: rapid and copious production of proinflammatory cytokines by peripheral blood Gd T cells in response to aminobisphosphonates is inhibited by statins. Clin Exp Immunol 2005;139:101–11. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02665.x
    1. Welton JL, Morgan MP, Martí S, et al. . Monocytes and γδ T cells control the acute-phase response to intravenous zoledronate: insights from a phase IV safety trial. J Bone Miner Res 2013;28:464–71. 10.1002/jbmr.1797
    1. Iba K, Shinozaki T, Maruo K, et al. . Re-Evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multivariable clinical prediction models. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021;21:9. 10.1186/s12874-020-01201-w
    1. Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, et al. . Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ 2020;368:m441. 10.1136/bmj.m441
    1. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. . A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1373–9. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
    1. Thompson K, Keech F, McLernon DJ, et al. . Fluvastatin does not prevent the acute-phase response to intravenous zoledronic acid in post-menopausal women. Bone 2011;49:140–5. 10.1016/j.bone.2010.10.177
    1. Schneiders FL, Huijts CM, Reijm M, et al. . The effects of systemic treatment with aminobisphosphonates and statins on circulating Vγ9Vδ2-T cells in patients with advanced cancer. Immunobiology 2018;223:171–7. 10.1016/j.imbio.2017.10.029
    1. Pan HY, DeVault AR, Wang-Iverson D, et al. . Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pravastatin and lovastatin. J Clin Pharmacol 1990;30:1128–35. 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1990.tb01856.x
    1. de Denus S, Spinler SA, Miller K, et al. . Statins and liver toxicity: a meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy 2004;24:584–91. 10.1592/phco.24.6.584.34738
    1. Silva MA, Swanson AC, Gandhi PJ, et al. . Statin-related adverse events: a meta-analysis. Clin Ther 2006;28:26–35. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.005
    1. Pfeffer MA, Keech A, Sacks FM, et al. . Safety and tolerability of pravastatin in long-term clinical trials: prospective pravastatin pooling (ppp) project. Circulation 2002;105:2341–6. 10.1161/01.cir.0000017634.00171.24
    1. Rosenson RS, Bays HE. Results of two clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of pravastatin 80 and 160 mg per day. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:878–81. 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00026-2
    1. Lewis JH, Mortensen ME, Zweig S, et al. . Efficacy and safety of high-dose pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Hepatology 2007;46:1453–63. 10.1002/hep.21848

Source: PubMed

Подписаться