The addition of a goal-based motivational interview to standardised treatment as usual to reduce dropouts in a service for patients with personality disorder: a feasibility study

Mary McMurran, W Miles Cox, Stephen Coupe, Diane Whitham, Lucy Hedges, Mary McMurran, W Miles Cox, Stephen Coupe, Diane Whitham, Lucy Hedges

Abstract

Background: Rates of non-completion of treatments for personality disorder are high and there are indications that those who do not complete treatment have worse outcomes than those who do. Improving both cost-efficiency and client welfare require attention to engaging people with personality disorder in treatment. A motivational interview, based on the Personal Concerns Inventory, may have the ability to enhance engagement and retention in therapy. Here, we report the protocol for a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Methods: All referrals accepted to the psychological service of Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust's outpatient service for people with personality disorder are eligible for inclusion. Consenting participants are randomised to receive the Personal Concerns Inventory interview plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual only. We aim to recruit 100 participants over 11/2 years. A randomised controlled trial will be considered feasible if 1 the recruitment rate to the project is 54% of all referrals (95% CI 54-64), 2 80% of clients find the intervention acceptable in terms of its practicability and usefulness (95% CI 80-91), and 3 80% of therapists report finding the intervention helpful (95% CI 80-100). In a full-scale randomised controlled trial, the primary outcome measure will be completion of treatment i.e., entry into and completion of ≥ 75% of sessions offered. Therefore, information will be collected on recruitment rates, attendance at therapy sessions, and completion of treatment. The feasibility of examining the processes of engagement will be tested by assessing the value, coherence, and attainability of goals pre-treatment, and engagement in treatment. The costs associated with the intervention will be calculated, and the feasibility of calculating the cost-benefits of the intervention will be tested. The views of clients and therapists on the intervention, collected using semi-structured interviews, will be analysed using thematic analysis.

Discussion: The Personal Concerns Interview as a preparation for treatment of people with personality has the potential to maximise treatment uptake, reduce unfilled places in treatment programmes, and prevent group treatments faltering through non-attendance. Most importantly, it has the potential to improve patient outcomes, helping them to function better and reduce hospitalisation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov.UK Identifier--NCT01132976.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The intervention and assessment schedule flowchart.

References

    1. National Institute of Mental Health for England. Personality disorder: No longer a diagnosis of exclusion. London: Department of Health; 2003.
    1. McMurran M, Huband N, Overton E. Non-completion of personality disorder treatments: A systematic review of correlates, consequences, and interventions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:277–287. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.12.002.
    1. Karterud S, Pederson G, Bjordal E, Brabrand J, Friis S, Haaseth Ø, Haavaldsen G, Irion T, Leirvåg H, Tørum E, Urnes Ø. Day treatment of people with personality disorders: Experiences from a Norwegian treatment research network. J Pers Disord. 2003;17:243–262. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.3.243.22151.
    1. Webb D, McMurran M. A comparison of women who continue and discontinue treatment for borderline personality disorder. Personality and Mental Health. 2009;3:142–149. doi: 10.1002/pmh.69.
    1. Ogrodnikzuk J, Joyce AS, Piper W. Strategies for reducing patient-initiated premature termination of psychotherapy. Harvard Rev Psychiat. 2005;13:57–70. doi: 10.1080/10673220590956429.
    1. Klinger E. Conceptual framework and issues for a goals-oriented treatment perspective: A commentary on "Where do we go from here? The goal perspective in psychotherapy". Clin Psychol-Sci Pr. 2006;13:371–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00050.x.
    1. Emmons RA. Striving for the sacred: Personal goals, life meaning, and religion. J Soc Issues. 2005;61:731–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00429.x.
    1. Michalak J, Grosse Holtforth M. Where do we go from here? The goal perspective in psychotherapy. Clin Psychol-Sci Pr. 2006;13:346–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00048.x.
    1. Cox WM, Klinger E. In: Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Concepts, Approaches, and Assessment. Cox WM, Klinger E, editor. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2004. A motivational model of alcohol use: Determinants of use and change; pp. 121–138.
    1. Cox WM, Klinger E. Motivational structure: Relationships with substance use and processes of change. Addict Behav. 2002;27:925–940. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00290-3.
    1. Cox WM, Blount JP, Bair J, Hosier SG. Motivational predictors of readiness to change chronic substance abuse. Addict Res. 2000;8:121–128. doi: 10.3109/16066350009004415.
    1. Cox WM, Schippers GM, Klinger E, Skutle A, Stuchlikova I, Man F, King AL, Inderhaug R. Motivational structure and alcohol use of university students with consistency across four nations. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63:280–285.
    1. Theodosi E, McMurran M. Motivating convicted sex offenders into treatment: A pilot study. British Journal of Forensic Practice. 2006;8:28–35.
    1. Banerjee P, Duggan C, Huband N, Watson N. Brief psychoeducation for people with personality disorder: A pilot study. Psychol Psychother-T. 2006;79:385–394. doi: 10.1348/147608305X57987.
    1. Huband N, McMurran M, Evans C, Duggan C. Social problem solving plus psychoeducation for adults with personality disorder: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Brit J Psychiat. 2007;190:307–313. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.023341.
    1. Hyler SE. Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1994.
    1. Drieschner KH, Boomsma A. The Treatment Engagement Rating scale (TER) for forensic outpatient treatment: Description, psychometric properties, and norms. Psychol, Crime Law. 2008;14:299–315. doi: 10.1080/10683160701858206.
    1. Beecham J, Knapp M. In: Measuring Mental Health Needs. 2. Thornicroft G, editor. London: Gaskell; 2001. Costing psychiatric interventions.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться