Mobile Apps for Health Behavior Change: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Madison Milne-Ives, Ching Lam, Michelle Helena Van Velthoven, Edward Meinert, Madison Milne-Ives, Ching Lam, Michelle Helena Van Velthoven, Edward Meinert

Abstract

Background: The popularity and ubiquity of mobile apps have rapidly expanded in the past decade. With a growing focus on patient interaction with health management, mobile apps are increasingly used to monitor health and deliver behavioral interventions. The considerable variation in these mobile health apps, from their target patient group to their health behavior, and their behavioral change strategy, has resulted in a large but incohesive body of literature.

Objective: The purpose of this protocol is to provide an overview of the current landscape, theories behind, and effectiveness of mobile apps for health behavior change.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols will be used to structure this protocol. The focus of the systematic review is guided by a population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework. A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any discrepancies will then be discussed and resolved. One reviewer will extract data into a standardized form, which will be validated by a second reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool, and a descriptive analysis will summarize the effectiveness of all the apps.

Results: As of November 2019, the systematic review has been completed and is in peer review for publication.

Conclusions: This systematic review will summarize the current mobile app technologies and their effectiveness, usability, and coherence with behavior change theory. It will identify areas of improvement (where there is no evidence of efficacy) and help inform the development of more useful and engaging mobile health apps.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42019155604; https://tinyurl.com/sno4lcu.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/16931.

Keywords: cell phone; health behavior; intervention; mobile apps; mobile health; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Madison Milne-Ives, Ching Lam, Michelle Helena Van Velthoven, Edward Meinert. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 30.01.2020.

References

    1. Clancy C. Patient engagement in health care. Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):389–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01254.x.
    1. Sawesi S, Rashrash M, Phalakornkule K, Carpenter JS, Jones JF. The Impact of Information Technology on Patient Engagement and Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review of the Literature. JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Jan 21;4(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4514.
    1. Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F. Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 29;19(6):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7126.
    1. Partridge SR, Redfern J. Strategies to Engage Adolescents in Digital Health Interventions for Obesity Prevention and Management. Healthcare (Basel) 2018 Jun 21;6(3) doi: 10.3390/healthcare6030070.
    1. Cockerham W, Dingwall R, Quah S. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014.
    1. Pinder C, Vermeulen J, Cowan BR, Beale R. Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2018 Jun 28;25(3):1–66. doi: 10.1145/3196830.
    1. Conner M, Norman P. Health behaviour: Current issues and challenges. Psychol Health. 2017 Aug 14;32(8):895–906. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1336240.
    1. Stephens TN, Joerin A, Rauws M, Werk LN. Feasibility of pediatric obesity and prediabetes treatment support through Tess, the AI behavioral coaching chatbot. Transl Behav Med. 2019 May 16;9(3):440–447. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz043.
    1. McKay FH, Wright A, Shill J, Stephens H, Uccellini M. Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic Search and Rating of Apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 04;7(7):e11926. doi: 10.2196/11926.
    1. Jiang H, Li M, Wen LM, Baur L, He G, Ma X, Qian X. A Community-Based Short Message Service Intervention to Improve Mothers' Feeding Practices for Obesity Prevention: Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 03;7(6):e13828. doi: 10.2196/13828.
    1. Aitken M, Clancy B, Nass D. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. 2017. Nov, [2019-12-13]. The Growing Value of Digital Healthvidence and Impact on Human Health and the Healthcare System .
    1. Ferrara G, Kim J, Lin S, Hua J, Seto E. A Focused Review of Smartphone Diet-Tracking Apps: Usability, Functionality, Coherence With Behavior Change Theory, and Comparative Validity of Nutrient Intake and Energy Estimates. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 17;7(5):e9232. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9232.
    1. Trifan A, Oliveira M, Oliveira JL. Passive Sensing of Health Outcomes Through Smartphones: Systematic Review of Current Solutions and Possible Limitations. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 23;7(8):e12649. doi: 10.2196/12649.
    1. Han M, Lee E. Effectiveness of Mobile Health Application Use to Improve Health Behavior Changes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Jul;24(3):207–226. doi: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.3.207.
    1. Gordon WJ, Bates DW, Fuchs D, Pappas J, Silacci S, Landman A. Comparing Characteristics of Patients Who Connect Their iPhones to an Electronic Health Records System Versus Patients Who Connect Without Personal Devices: Cohort Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 22;21(8):e14871. doi: 10.2196/14871.
    1. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
    1. Payne HE, Lister C, West JH, Bernhardt JM. Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Feb 26;3(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3335.
    1. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
    1. Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 15;7(283):283rv3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487.
    1. Hedin B, Katzeff C, Eriksson E, Pargman D. A Systematic Review of Digital Behaviour Change Interventions for More Sustainable Food Consumption. Sustainability. 2019 May 08;11(9):2638. doi: 10.3390/su11092638.
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche Peter C, Jüni Peter, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Cochrane Statistical Methods Group The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343(oct18 2):d5928–d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться