An engaged research study to assess the effect of a 'real-world' dietary intervention on urinary bisphenol A (BPA) levels in teenagers

Tamara S Galloway, Nigel Baglin, Benjamin P Lee, Anna L Kocur, Maggie H Shepherd, Anna M Steele, BPA Schools Study Consortium, Lorna W Harries, Tamara S Galloway, Nigel Baglin, Benjamin P Lee, Anna L Kocur, Maggie H Shepherd, Anna M Steele, BPA Schools Study Consortium, Lorna W Harries

Abstract

Objective: Bisphenol A (BPA) has been associated with adverse human health outcomes and exposure to this compound is near-ubiquitous in the Western world. We aimed to examine whether self-moderation of BPA exposure is possible by altering diet in a real-world setting.

Design: An Engaged Research dietary intervention study designed, implemented and analysed by healthy teenagers from six schools and undertaken in their own homes.

Participants: A total of 94 students aged between 17 and 19 years from schools in the South West of the UK provided diet diaries and urine samples for analysis.

Intervention: Researcher participants designed a set of literature-informed guidelines for the reduction of dietary BPA to be followed for 7 days.

Main outcome measures: Creatinine-adjusted urinary BPA levels were taken before and after the intervention. Information on packaging and food/drink ingested was used to calculate a BPA risk score for anticipated exposure. A qualitative analysis was carried out to identify themes addressing long-term sustainability of the diet.

Results: BPA was detected in urine of 86% of participants at baseline at a median value of 1.22 ng/mL (IQR 1.99). No effect of the intervention diet on BPA levels was identified overall (P=0.25), but there was a positive association in those participants who showed a drop in urinary BPA concentration postintervention and their initial BPA level (P=0.003). Qualitative analysis identified themes around feelings of lifestyle restriction and the inadequacy of current labelling practices.

Conclusions: We found no evidence in this self-administered intervention study that it was possible to moderate BPA exposure by diet in a real-world setting. Furthermore, our study participants indicated that they would be unlikely to sustain such a diet long term, due to the difficulty in identifying BPA-free foods.

Keywords: bisphenol A; community; dietary intervention; endocrine disrupting chemical; engaged research; plastic packaging; polycarbonate; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of a ‘real-world’ bisphenol A (BPA) avoidance diet on urinary BPA exposure over a 7-day period. (A) Urinary BPA (ng/mL) adjusted for urinary creatinine was plotted at visit 1 before the intervention and at visit 2 after the intervention. Three extreme outliers have been removed. The trajectories of individual participant measurements are shown. (B) Changes in urinary BPA in ng/mL following the intervention diet are plotted against the self-reported BPA risk score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effect of baseline urinary bisphenol A (BPA) on the probability of achieving a drop in concentrations following the intervention. This graph illustrates the median urinary BPA adjusted for creatinine at visit 1 prior to the intervention expressed relative to whether or not a reduction in urinary BPA was achieved following the 7-day intervention diet at visit 2. Error bars refer to the IQR of measurement.

References

    1. Geens T, Aerts D, Berthot C, et al. . A review of dietary and non-dietary exposure to bisphenol-A. Food Chem Toxicol 2012;50:3725–40. 10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.059
    1. WHO. World Health Organisation background paper on mechanisms of action of bisphenol A and other biochemical/molecular interactions. 11: WHO/HSE/FOS, 2010.
    1. EFSA. Scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs. 13: EFSA journal, 2015.
    1. Rochester JR, Bisphenol A. Bisphenol A and human health: a review of the literature. Reprod Toxicol 2013;42:132–55. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.08.008
    1. WHO. Joint FAO/WHO Expert meeting to review toxicological and health aspects of bisphenol A Summary report, 2010.
    1. Galloway T, Cipelli R, Guralnik J, et al. . Daily bisphenol A excretion and associations with sex hormone concentrations: results from the InCHIANTI adult population study. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118:1603–8. 10.1289/ehp.1002367
    1. Melzer D, Rice NE, Lewis C, et al. . Association of urinary bisphenol a concentration with heart disease: evidence from NHANES 2003/06. PLoS One 2010;5:e8673 10.1371/journal.pone.0008673
    1. Song Y, Chou EL, Baecker A, et al. . Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, risk of type 2 diabetes, and diabetes-related metabolic traits: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes 2016;8 10.1111/1753-0407.12325
    1. Savastano S, Tarantino G, D’Esposito V, et al. . Bisphenol-A plasma levels are related to inflammatory markers, visceral obesity and insulin-resistance: a cross-sectional study on adult male population. J Transl Med 2015;13:169 10.1186/s12967-015-0532-y
    1. Braun JM. Early-life exposure to EDCs: role in childhood obesity and neurodevelopment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017;13:161–73. 10.1038/nrendo.2016.186
    1. Vandenberg LN, Chahoud I, Heindel JJ, et al. . Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118:1055–70. 10.1289/ehp.0901716
    1. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, et al. . EDC-2: the endocrine society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev 2015;36:E1–150. 10.1210/er.2015-1010
    1. Agency EC. Agreement of the member state committee on the identification of 4,4'-isopropylidenediphenol (bisphenol A) as a substance of very high concern. Annex XV 2017.
    1. Lakind JS, Naiman DQ. Daily intake of bisphenol A and potential sources of exposure: 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2011;21:272–9. 10.1038/jes.2010.9
    1. Dekant W, Völkel W. Human exposure to bisphenol A by biomonitoring: methods, results and assessment of environmental exposures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2008;228:114–34. 10.1016/j.taap.2007.12.008
    1. Rudel RA, Gray JM, Engel CL, et al. . Food packaging and bisphenol A and bis(2-ethyhexyl) phthalate exposure: findings from a dietary intervention. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119:914–20. 10.1289/ehp.1003170
    1. Sathyanarayana S, Alcedo G, Saelens BE, et al. . Unexpected results in a randomized dietary trial to reduce phthalate and bisphenol A exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2013;23:378–84. 10.1038/jes.2013.9
    1. Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, et al. . Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:39–44. 10.1289/ehp.10753
    1. Hornung RW, Reed LD. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1990;5:46–51. 10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587
    1. Stahlhut RW, Welshons WV, Swan SH. Bisphenol A data in NHANES suggest longer than expected half-life, substantial nonfood exposure, or both. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117:784–9. 10.1289/ehp.0800376
    1. Zota AR, Phillips CA, Mitro SD. Recent fast food consumption and bisphenol A and phthalates exposures among the U.S. population in NHANES, 2003-2010. Environ Health Perspect 2016;124:1521–8. 10.1289/ehp.1510803
    1. Cao XL, Perez-Locas C, Robichaud A, et al. . Levels and temporal trend of bisphenol A in composite food samples from Canadian total diet study 2008-2012. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2015;32:1–7. 10.1080/19440049.2015.1088663
    1. Aschberger K, Castello P, Hoekstra E, et al. . Bisphenol A and baby bottles: challenges and perspectives, 2010.
    1. Le HH, Carlson EM, Chua JP, et al. . Bisphenol A is released from polycarbonate drinking bottles and mimics the neurotoxic actions of estrogen in developing cerebellar neurons. Toxicol Lett 2008;176:149–56. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.11.001
    1. Brede C, Fjeldal P, Skjevrak I, et al. . Increased migration levels of bisphenol A from polycarbonate baby bottles after dishwashing, boiling and brushing. Food Addit Contam 2003;20:684–9. 10.1080/0265203031000119061
    1. Myridakis A, Chalkiadaki G, Fotou M, et al. . Exposure of preschool-age greek children (RHEA Cohort) to bisphenol a, parabens, phthalates, and organophosphates. Environ Sci Technol 2016;50:932–41. 10.1021/acs.est.5b03736
    1. Lv Y, Lu S, Dai Y, et al. . Higher dermal exposure of cashiers to BPA and its association with DNA oxidative damage. Environ Int 2017;98:69–74. 10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.001
    1. Stingl JC, Bartels H, Viviani R, et al. . Relevance of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase polymorphisms for drug dosing: a quantitative systematic review. Pharmacol Ther 2014;141:92–116. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.09.002
    1. Melzer D, Osborne NJ, Henley WE, et al. . Urinary bisphenol A concentration and risk of future coronary artery disease in apparently healthy men and women. Circulation 2012;125:1482–90. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.069153

Source: PubMed

Подписаться