Validation Study of the Spanish Version of the Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale

Alicia Sánchez-Pérez, Sofía López-Roig, Ana Pampliega Pérez, Paula Peral Gómez, María Ángeles Pastor, Miriam Hurtado Pomares, Alicia Sánchez-Pérez, Sofía López-Roig, Ana Pampliega Pérez, Paula Peral Gómez, María Ángeles Pastor, Miriam Hurtado Pomares

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD-E) in the following areas: content, response process, internal structure, and relation to other constructs.We designed a cross-sectional observational study. The DAD-E was administered to 132 participants diagnosed with mild cognitive decline, prodromal Alzheimer disease, Alzheimer disease, or no cognitive decline. For the reliability study, we performed analyses of internal consistency, test-retest, and equivalent measures. To study validity, we performed item analysis, principal components analysis, and correlations with other measures.The sample was composed of 37 healthy participants (28%) and 95 patients (72%). In the total scale, Cronbach alpha was 0.963, intraclass correlation coefficient in the test-retest analysis was 0.983 (95% CI [95% confidence interval] = 0.969-0.991), and the analysis for equivalent measures was 0.949 (95% CI = 0.897-0.975). Out of the 40 items, we found that 37 presented a correlation index with the total score above 0.40. The principal components analysis suggests that 61.7% of the variance is explained by a single component that groups all scores on Activities of Daily Living. The DAD total score presents correlations with Barthel's Index of 0.882 (P = 0.000) and with Lawton and Brodie's Index of 0.877 (P = 0.000) and with the Mini Mental State Examination of 0.679 (P = 0.000).The DAD-E is a reliable and valid instrument to assess functional disability in people with cognitive decline in Spanish population.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366:2112–2117.
    1. Comité ad hoc Sociedad Valenciana de Neurología. Plan de asistencia integral a los pacientes con enfermedad de alzheimer y otras demencias en la comunidad valenciana. 2002. Available at: [Accessed July 28, 2014].
    1. Gelinas I, Gauthier L, McIntyre M, et al. Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer's disease: the disability assessment for dementia. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53:471–481.
    1. Mok CC, Siu AM, Chan WC, et al. Functional disabilities profile of Chinese elderly people with Alzheimer's disease: a validation study on the Chinese version of the disability assessment for dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005; 20:112–119.
    1. De Vreese LP, Caffarra P, Savare R, et al. Functional disability in early Alzheimer's disease: a validation study of the Italian version of the disability assessment for dementia scale. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008; 25:186–194.
    1. Suh GH. Development of the Korean version of disability assessment for dementia scale (DAD-K) to assess function in dementia. J Korean Geriatr Soc 2003; 7:278–287.
    1. Carthery-Goulart MT, Areza-Fegyveres R, Schultz RR, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the disability assessment for dementia (DAD). Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2007; 65:916–919.
    1. Bahia VS, Carthery-Goulart MT, Novelli MM, et al. Functional disability in Alzheimer disease: a validation study of the Brazilian version of the disability assessment for dementia (DAD-br). Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2010; 24:291–295.
    1. Tozlu M, Cankurtaran M, Yavuz BB, et al. Functional disability in Alzheimer disease: a validation study of the Turkish version of the disability assessment for dementia scale. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2014; 27:237–246.
    1. de Rotrou J, Wu YH, Hugonot-Diener L, et al. DAD-6: a 6-item version of the disability assessment for dementia scale which may differentiate Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment from controls. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2012; 33:210–218.
    1. Sánchez-Pérez A. Adaptación y validación de la escala disability assessment for dementia (DAD) en la población española castellano hablante. Alicante: Universidad Miguel Hernández; 2013.
    1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 1999; 56:303–308.
    1. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6:734–746.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM IV. 4th ed.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
    1. Fernandez M, Gobartt AL, Balana M. COOPERA Study Group. Behavioural symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's disease and their association with cognitive impairment. BMC Neurol 2010; 10:87.
    1. Valverde M, Flórez M, Sánchez I. Activities of daily living scales. Rehabilitación 1994; 28:377–388.
    1. Baztán J, González J, Del Ser T. Del Ser T, Peña-Casanova J. Escalas de actividades de la vida diaria. Evaluación neuropsicológica y funcional de la demencia. Barcelona: J. R. Prous Editores; 1994. 137–164.
    1. Peña- Casanova J, Gramunt-Fombuena N, Gich-Fullá J. Test neuropsicológicos. Fundamentos para una neuropsicología clínica basada en evidencias. Barcelona: Masson S. A; 2004.
    1. Domenech J, Granero R. Macro ¡KAPPA for SPSS Statistics. Weighted Kappa [computer program]. V2009.07.31. Available at: (accessed 5 March 2013).
    1. Fleiss J. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley; 1981.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться