Evolving imaging methods of prostate cancer and the emergence of magnetic resonance imaging guided ablation techniques

Mikael Anttinen, Roberto Blanco Sequeiros, Peter J Boström, Pekka Taimen, Mikael Anttinen, Roberto Blanco Sequeiros, Peter J Boström, Pekka Taimen

Abstract

Established therapies for prostate cancer (PCa), surgery and radiotherapy, treat the entire gland regardless of the location of the cancerous lesion within the prostate. Although effective, these methods include a significant risk of worsening genitourinary outcomes. Targeted image-guided cancer therapy has gained acceptance through improved PCa detection, localization, and characterization by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Minimally-invasive ablative techniques aim to achieve comparable oncological outcomes to radical treatment while preserving genitourinary function. Transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) and next-generation transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) utilize MRI guidance to thermally ablate prostate tissue under real-time MRI monitoring and active temperature feedback control. Previous trials performed by our group and others, including a large multicenter study in men with localized favorable-risk disease, have demonstrated that TULSA provides effective prostate ablation with a favorable safety profile and low impact on quality of life. Recently, MRI-guided HIFU focal therapy was also shown as a safe and effective treatment of intermediate-risk PCa. Here we review the current literature on ablative techniques in the treatment of localized PCa with a focus on TULSA and HIFU methods.

Keywords: HIFU; MRI; Tulsa; ablation therapy; high-intensity focused ultrasound; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; transurethral ultrasound ablation.

Conflict of interest statement

MA reports grants from Profound Medical Inc, Finnish Urological Research Foundation, and Finnish Urological Association, and personal fees from Astellas, Bayer, Orion, and Janssen-Cilag, all outside the submitted work. PB reports personal fees from Profound Medical Inc and Janssen-Cilag Company outside the submitted work. PT reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, and MSD and non-financial support from MSD, all outside the submitted work. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Anttinen, Blanco Sequeiros, Boström and Taimen.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Description of the TULSA technology. MRI-guided TULSA is a minimally invasive ablation technique delivering directional high-intensity ultrasound energy (*) to the prostate (yellow circle) using a transurethral rotational UA comprised of 10 independently controlled ultrasound elements (A). By actively cooling both the urethra and rectum throughout the ablation, TULSA protects these structures from thermal injuries (B, C). Real-time MRI-thermometry is continuously acquired during the ablation to automatically control the delivered lethal thermal energy by adjusting each ultrasound element’s frequency and power and the UA’s rotation rate (D). On the axial maximum temperature image of a patient undergoing lesion-targeted TULSA of a posterior peripheral zone tumor (D), a minimum lethal temperature of 55°C reaches the drawn (black) boundary. Due to prostate swelling caused by the ablation, the catheter is kept in place for weeks after the procedure (see Figure 2 patient case with a suprapubic catheter). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; TULSA, transurethral ultrasound ablation; UA, ultrasound applicator.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of a successful salvage TULSA patient case. The patient had a rising PSA of up to 13 ng/ml within six years after primary external beam radiotherapy. Screening T2-weighted (A) and diffusion-weighted (B) MRI showed a distinct anterior lesion with early enhancement on gadolinium-enhanced imaging (C) graded as PI-RR 5 lesion. The same lesion was also clearly visible in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT (maximum standardized uptake value 23) (D). Two residual gold fiducial markers implanted before image-guided radiotherapy are also visible next to the PSMA-positive lesion (D). The MRI-targeted biopsy from the lesion revealed vital carcinoma resembling ISUP GG 5 disease (E). The patient underwent whole-gland TULSA. On the sagittal T1-weighted image (F), a transurethrally inserted ultrasound applicator, endorectal cooling device, and suprapubic catheter are in place. The targeted region reached a lethal minimum temperature of 55°C (G). The non-perfused volume can be visualized immediately after treatment, demonstrating the acute ablation effect covering the targeted lesion (H). At 12 months, the patient underwent follow-up imaging with multiparametric MRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT (I, J), both negative for cancer. The prostate volume decreased from 20 cm3 to less than 1 cm3 at 12 months. The 12-month post-TULSA biopsy agreed with imaging findings and showed only a treatment effect with no signs of cancer (K). At the recent follow-up visit two years after TULSA, PSA is still low (PSA 0.067 ng/ml) and stable, and the patient has leak- and pad-free continence and erections sufficient for intercourse. The TULSA treatment report of the patient case, including treatment planning, thermal mapping, and post-treatment gadolinium-enhanced images, is provided in Supplementary Figure S1. CT, computed tomography; ISUP GG, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; PI-RR, Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen; TRUS, transrectal ultrasound; TULSA, Transurethral ultrasound ablation.

References

    1. Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol (2020) 77(1):38–52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005
    1. Bleyer A, Spreafico F, Barr R. Prostate cancer in young men: An emerging young adult and older adolescent challenge. Cancer (2020) 126(1):46–57. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32498
    1. Ye Y, Zheng Y, Miao Q, Ruan H, Zhang X. Causes of death among prostate cancer patients aged 40 years and older in the united states. Front Oncol (2022) 12:914875. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.914875
    1. Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Davis M, Young GJ, et al. . Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol (2020) 77(3):320–30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.030
    1. Ahmed HU, Arya M, Freeman A, Emberton M. Do low-grade and low-volume prostate cancers bear the hallmarks of malignancy? Lancet Oncol (2012) 13(11):e509–17. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70388-1
    1. Guidelines EAU. Edn. presented at the EAU annual congress Amsterdam. (2022). Available at: .
    1. Hoffman KE, Penson DF, Zhao Z, Huang LC, Conwill R, Laviana AA, et al. . Patient-reported outcomes through 5 years for active surveillance, surgery, brachytherapy, or external beam radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Jama (2020) 323(2):149–63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20675
    1. Higano CS. Cardiovascular disease and androgen axis–targeted drugs for prostate cancer. New Engl J Med (2020) 382(23):2257–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2016433
    1. Drost FJH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, et al. . Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. CochraneDatabase Syst Rev (2019) 4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663
    1. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): A prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet (2020) 395(10231):1208–16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7
    1. Sweat SD, Pacelli A, Murphy GP, Bostwick DG. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Urology (1998) 52(4):637–40. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00278-7
    1. Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, Fritz J, von Guggenberg E, Kendler D, et al. . 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2017) 44(6):941–9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3631-6
    1. Kalapara AA, Nzenza T, Pan HY, Ballok Z, Ramdave S, O'Sullivan R, et al. . Detection and localisation of primary prostate cancer using 68gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radical prostatectomy specimen pathology. BJU Int (2020) 126(1):83–90. doi: 10.1111/bju.14858
    1. Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, Souvatzoglou M, Haller B, Weirich G, et al. . Diagnostic efficacy of 68gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol (2016) 195(5):1436–43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.025
    1. Bahler CD, Green M, Hutchins GD, Cheng L, Magers MJ, Fletcher J, et al. . Prostate specific membrane antigen targeted positron emission tomography of primary prostate cancer: assessing accuracy with whole mount pathology. J Urol (2020) 203(1):92–9. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000501
    1. Privé BM, Israël B, Schilham MG, Muselaers CH, Zámecnik P, Mulders PF, et al. . Evaluating f-18-PSMA-1007-PET in primary prostate cancer and comparing it to multi-parametric MRI and histopathology. Prostate Cancer prostatic Dis (2021) 24(2):423–30. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00292-2
    1. Ahmed HU. The index lesion and the origin of prostate cancer. New Engl J Med (2009) 361(17):1704–6. doi: 10.1056/nejmcibr0905562
    1. Nevoux P, Ouzzane A, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Montironi R, Presti JC, Jr., et al. . Quantitative tissue analyses of prostate cancer foci in an unselected cystoprostatectomy series. BJU Int (2012) 110(4):517–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10776.x
    1. Mouraviev V, Mayes JM, Sun L, Madden JF, Moul JW, Polascik TJ. Prostate cancer laterality as a rationale of focal ablative therapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Cancer: Interdiscip Int J Am Cancer Soc (2007) 110(4):906–10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22858
    1. Byar DP, Mostofi FK, Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group . Carcinoma of the prostate: prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies. Cancer (1972) 30(1):5–13. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197207)30
    1. Wei L, Wang J, Lampert E, Schlanger S, DePriest AD, Hu Q, et al. . Intratumoral and intertumoral genomic heterogeneity of multifocal localized prostate cancer impacts molecular classifications and genomic prognosticators. Eur Urol (2017) 71(2):183–92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.008
    1. Løvf M, Zhao S, Axcrona U, Johannessen B, Bakken AC, Carm KT, et al. . Multifocal primary prostate cancer exhibits high degree of genomic heterogeneity. Eur Urol (2019) 75(3):498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.009
    1. Arora R, Koch MO, Eble JN, Ulbright TM, Li L, Cheng L. Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer: Interdiscip Int J Am Cancer Soc (2004) 100(11):2362–6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20243
    1. McNeal JE. Cancer volume and site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the prostate: relationship to local and distant spread. Hum Pathol (1992) 23(3):258–66. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90106-D
    1. Mouraviev V, Villers A, Bostwick DG, Wheeler TM, Montironi R, Polascik TJ. Understanding the pathological features of focality, grade and tumour volume of early-stage prostate cancer as a foundation for parenchyma-sparing prostate cancer therapies: active surveillance and focal targeted therapy. BJU Int (2011) 108(7):1074–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10039.x
    1. Algaba F, Montironi R. Impact of prostate cancer multifocality on its biology and treatment. J Endourol (2010) 24(5):799–804. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0462
    1. Wise AM, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Clayton JL. Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology (2002) 60(2):264–9. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01728-4
    1. Karavitakis M, Winkler M, Abel P, Livni N, Beckley I, Ahmed HU. Histological characteristics of the index lesion in whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens: implications for focal therapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2011) 14(1):46–52. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2010.16
    1. Ahmed HU, Dickinson L, Charman S, Weir S, McCartan N, Hindley RG, et al. . Focal ablation targeted to the index lesion in multifocal localised prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Eur Urol (2015) 68(6):927–36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.030
    1. Le JD, Tan N, Shkolyar E, Lu DY, Kwan L, Marks LS, et al. . Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. Eur Urol (2015) 67(3):569–76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.079
    1. Zhou Z, Zhou Y, Yan W, Sun H, Li Q, Li H, et al. . Unilateral lesion detected on preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy is not an appropriate indication for focal therapy in prostate cancer. In Urol Oncol: Semin Original Investi (2021) 39(10):730–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.021
    1. Johnson DC, Raman SS, Mirak SA, Kwan L, Bajgiran AM, Hsu W, et al. . Detection of individual prostate cancer foci via multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol (2019) 75(5):712–20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.031
    1. Choi YH, Yu JW, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, et al. . Histological characteristics of the largest and secondary tumors in radical prostatectomy specimens and implications for focal therapy. Diagn Pathol (2019) 14(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0782-8
    1. Pooli A, Johnson DC, Shirk J, Markovic D, Sadun TY, Sisk AE, Jr., et al. . Predicting pathological tumor size in prostate cancer based on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative findings. J Urol (2021) 205(2):444–51. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001389
    1. Priester A, Natarajan S, Khoshnoodi P, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Reiter RE, et al. . Magnetic resonance imaging underestimation of prostate cancer geometry: use of patient specific molds to correlate images with whole mount pathology. J Urol (2017) 197(2):320–6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.084
    1. Merisaari H, Jambor I, Ettala O, Boström PJ, Montoya Perez I, Verho J, et al. . IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD trial): sensitivity for prostate cancer detection in correlation with whole-mount prostatectomy sections and implications for focal therapy. J Magnetic Reson Imaging (2019) 50(5):1641–50. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26727
    1. Hopstaken JS, Bomers JG, Sedelaar MJ, Valerio M, Fütterer JJ, Rovers MM. An updated systematic review on focal therapy in localized prostate cancer: what has changed over the past 5 years? Eur Urol (2022) 81(1):5–33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.005
    1. Tay KJ, Polascik TJ, Elshafei A, Tsivian E, Jones JS. Propensity score-matched comparison of partial to whole-gland cryotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of the cryo on-line data registry data. J Endourol (2017) 31(6):564–71. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0830
    1. Byun SS, Jin N, Lee H. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation for prostate cancer: Whole versus partial gland ablation. Clin Genitouri Cancer (2022) 20(1):e39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.09.003
    1. Keserci B, Duc NM, Nadarajan C, Huy HQ, Saizan A, Ahmed WAW, et al. . Volumetric MRI-guided, high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine leiomyomas: ASEAN preliminary experience. Diagn Intervent Radiol (2020) 26(3):207. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.19157
    1. Duc NM, Huy HQ. A technical update of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Imaging Med (2018) 10(5):139–42.
    1. Dora C, Clarke GM, Frey G, Sella D. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate cancer: A systematic review. J Endourol (2022) 30(6):841–54. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0866
    1. Anttinen M, Mäkelä P, Suomi V, Kiviniemi A, Saunavaara J, Sainio T, et al. . Feasibility of MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound for lesion-targeted ablation of prostate cancer. Scandinavian J Urol (2019) 53(5):295–302. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1660707
    1. Anttinen M, Mäkelä P, Nurminen P, Yli-Pietilä E, Suomi V, Sainio T, et al. . Palliative MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for symptomatic locally advanced prostate cancer. Scandinavian J Urol (2020) 54(6):481–6. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1814857
    1. Anttinen M, Mäkelä P, Viitala A, Nurminen P, Suomi V, Sainio T, et al. . Salvage magnetic resonance imaging–guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for localized radiorecurrent prostate cancer: 12-month functional and oncological results. Eur Urol Open Sci (2020) 22:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.007
    1. Viitala A, Anttinen M, Wright C, Virtanen I, Mäkelä P, Hovinen T, et al. . Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month clinical outcomes of a phase I study. BJU Int (2022) 129(2):208–16. doi: 10.1111/bju.15523
    1. Crouzet S, Chapelon JY, Rouvière O, Mege-Lechevallier F, Colombel M, Tonoli-Catez H, et al. . Whole-gland ablation of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: oncologic outcomes and morbidity in 1002 patients. Eur Urol (2014) 65(5):907–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.039
    1. Guillaumier S, Peters M, Arya M, Afzal N, Charman S, Dudderidge T, et al. . A multicentre study of 5-year outcomes following focal therapy in treating clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol (2018) 74(4):422–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.006
    1. Dickinson L, Arya M, Afzal N, Cathcart P, Charman SC, Cornaby A, et al. . Medium-term outcomes after whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of nonmetastatic prostate cancer from a multicentre registry cohort. Eur Urol (2016) 70(4):668–74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.054
    1. Bründl J, Osberghaus V, Zeman F, Breyer J, Ganzer R, Blana A, et al. . Oncological long-term outcome after whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer–21-yr follow-up. Eur Urol Focus (2022) 8(1):134–40. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.016
    1. Reddy D, Peters M, Shah TT, van Son M, Tanaka MB, Huber PM, et al. . Cancer control outcomes following focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound in 1379 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a multi-institute 15-year experience. Eur Urol (2022) 81(4):407–13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.005
    1. van Son MJ, Peters M, Reddy D, Shah TT, Hosking-Jervis F, Robinson S, et al. . Conventional radical versus focal treatment for localised prostate cancer: a propensity score weighted comparison of 6-year tumour control. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2021) 24(4):1120–8. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00369-6
    1. Shah TT, Reddy D, Peters M, Ball D, Kim NH, Gomez EG, et al. . Focal therapy compared to radical prostatectomy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: A propensity score-matched study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2021) 24(2):567–74. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00315-y
    1. Ehdaie B, Tempany CM, Holland F, Sjoberg DD, Kibel AS, Trinh QD, et al. . MRI-Guided focused ultrasound focal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a phase 2b, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol (2022) 23(7):910–8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00251-0
    1. Klotz L, Pavlovich CP, Chin J, Hatiboglu G, Koch M, Penson D, et al. . Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate cancer. J Urol (2021) 205(3):769–79. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001362
    1. Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Dickinson L, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Sahu, et al. . Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Lancet Oncol (2012) 13(6):622–32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70121-3
    1. Feijoo ERC, Sivaraman A, Barret E, Sanchez-Salas R, Galiano M, Rozet F, et al. . Focal high-intensity focused ultrasound targeted hemiablation for unilateral prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation of oncologic and functional outcomes. Eur Urol (2016) 69(2):214–20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.018
    1. Van Velthoven R, Aoun F, Marcelis Q, Albisinni S, Zanaty M, Lemort M, et al. . A prospective clinical trial of HIFU hemiablation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer prostatic Dis (2016) 19(1):79–83. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.55
    1. Rischmann P, Gelet A, Riche B, Villers A, Pasticier G, Bondil P, et al. . Focal high intensity focused ultrasound of unilateral localized prostate cancer: A prospective multicentric hemiablation study of 111 patients. Eur Urol (2017) 71(2):267–73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.039
    1. Ganzer R, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, Koch D, Baumunk D, Kuru T, et al. . Prospective multicenter phase II study on focal therapy (hemiablation) of the prostate with high intensity focused ultrasound. J Urol (2018) 199(4):983–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.033
    1. Johnston MJ, Emara A, Noureldin M, Bott S, Hindley RG. Focal high-intensity focussed ultrasound partial gland ablation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a report of medium-term outcomes from a single-center in the united kingdom. Urology (2019) 133:175–81. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.06.043
    1. Abreu AL, Peretsman S, Iwata A, Shakir A, Iwata T, Brooks J, et al. . High intensity focused ultrasound hemigland ablation for prostate cancer: initial outcomes of a united states series. J Urol (2020) 204(4):741–7. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001126
    1. Nahar B, Bhat A, Reis IM, Soodana-Prakash N, Becerra MF, Lopategui D, et al. . Prospective evaluation of focal high intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer. J Urol (2020) 204(3):483–9. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001015
    1. Shoji S, Hiraiwa S, Uemura K, Nitta M, Hasegawa M, Kawamura Y, et al. . Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for the localized prostate cancer for Asian based on the localization with MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided transperineal biopsy and 12-cores transperineal systematic biopsy: prospective analysis of oncological and functional outcomes. Int J Clin Oncol (2020) 25(10):1844–53. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01723-9
    1. Ramsay CR, Adewuyi TE, Gray J, Hislop J, Shirley MD, Jayakody S, et al. . Ablative therapy for people with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess (2015) 19(49):1–490. doi: 10.3310/hta19490
    1. Bates AS, Ayers J, Kostakopoulos N, Lumsden T, Schoots IG, Willemse PPM, et al. . A systematic review of focal ablative therapy for clinically localised prostate cancer in comparison with standard management options: limitations of the available evidence and recommendations for clinical practice and further research. Eur Urol Oncol (2021) 4(3):405–23. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.008
    1. Stabile A, Orczyk C, Hosking-Jervis F, Giganti F, Arya M, Hindley RG, et al. . Medium-term oncological outcomes in a large cohort of men treated with either focal or hemi-ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasonography for primary localized prostate cancer. BJU Int (2019) 124(3):431–40. doi: 10.1111/bju.14710
    1. Tran H, Kwok J, Pickles T, Tyldesley S, Black PC. Underutilization of local salvage therapy after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Urol Oncol: Semin Original Investi (2014) 32(5):701–6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.12.014
    1. Valle LF, Lehrer EJ, Markovic D, Elashoff D, Levin-Epstein R, Karnes RJ, et al. . A systematic review and meta-analysis of local salvage therapies after radiotherapy for prostate cancer (MASTER). Eur Urol (2021) 80(3):280–92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.010

Source: PubMed

Подписаться