Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Chandler Dora, Gina M Clarke, Gregory Frey, David Sella, Chandler Dora, Gina M Clarke, Gregory Frey, David Sella

Abstract

Purpose: MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) uses real-time MR thermometry feedback to target prostate disease. We systematically review the literature to synthesize efficacy, functional, and safety outcomes and assess the influence of planned ablation fraction on outcome. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2021 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting at least one efficacy, functional, or safety outcome after a single TULSA treatment were included. The relationship of freedom from salvage treatment and potency preservation with planned ablation volume was modeled. Results: Two hundred twenty-four patients were treated in 10 studies with up to a 5-year follow-up, mainly for primary localized prostate cancer (PCa) plus smaller cohorts with recurrent PCa, and locally advanced PCa (LAPC). The prostate-specific antigen decline from baseline up to 2 years, including focal to whole-gland ablation plans, was 54% to 97%. The rate of salvage treatment after one TULSA treatment for primary PCa was 7% to 17%. Continence and potency preservation were from 92% to 100% and from 75% to 98%. Urinary symptoms were stable in men with good voiding function at baseline, and 85% of men with concurrent PCa and lower urinary tract symptoms met the criteria for improvement. Symptom relief in a small cohort of men with LAPC was observed. Grade III adverse events were incurred by 13/224 men (6%), with no rectal injury/fistula or Grade IV complication. The planned ablation fraction was linearly related to salvage-free survival. The relationship between potency preservation and planned ablation fraction followed a sigmoid curve. Conclusions: As an alternative to conventional treatments, TULSA is safe and effective for prostate tissue ablation in men with primary PCa. There is also evidence that TULSA delivers effective relief of urinary symptoms while treating PCa in a single, low-morbidity procedure. The likelihood of freedom from additional treatment or potency preservation is associated with the planned ablation fraction.

Keywords: MRI-guided therapy; minimally invasive therapy; prostate cancer; systematic review; transurethral MRI-guided ultrasound ablation.

Conflict of interest statement

G.M.C. is an employee of Profound Medical, Inc., and receives salary and stock options.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram. Overview of study selection to meet the inclusion criteria. PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Relationship between planned ablation fraction and: (A) salvage-free survival, or freedom from additional or salvage treatment by up to 2 years after a single TULSA procedure, and (B) the rate of potency preservation. Only studies with intent-to-treat were included in (A), only men who were potent at baseline were included in (B), and both (A, B) include only men treated for primary prostate cancer. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals, and the legend indicates the study from which each data point was derived. The number of patients included at each data point is shown. Color images are available online.

References

    1. Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. . Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: The prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Instit 2004;96:1358–1367.
    1. Burnett AL, Aus G, Canby-Hagino ED, et al. . Erectile function outcome reporting after clinically localized prostate cancer treatment. J Urol 2007;178:597–601.
    1. Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Pontes JE. Salvage radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin N Am 2001;28:545–553.
    1. Valerio M, Cerantola Y, Eggener SE, et al. . New and established technology in focal ablation of the prostate: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2017;71:17–34.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. K191200 Traditional 510(k)—TULSA-PRO System. (accessed December 7, 2021).
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
    1. “Canadian Institute of Economics”: Development of a Quality Appraisal Tool for Case Series Using a modified Delphi Technique. Edmonton, Alberta, 2012.
    1. Klotz L, Pavlovich CP, Chin J, et al. . Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate cancer. J Urol 2021;205:769–779.
    1. Eggener S, Koch M, Penson D, et al. . PD17–02 Pivotal trial of MRI-guided ultrasound ablation in men with localized prostate cancer: Two-year follow-up. J Urol 2020;203:e369–e369. (conference abstract)
    1. Lumiani A, Samun D, Sroka R, Muschter R. Single-center retrospective analysis of 52 prostate cancer patients with customized MR-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA). Urol Oncol 2021;39:830..e9–830.e316.
    1. Chin JL, Billia M, Relle J, et al. . Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate tissue in patients with localized prostate cancer: A prospective Phase 1 clinical trial. Eur Urol 2016;70:447–455.
    1. Nair SM, Hatiboglu G, Relle J, et al. . Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation in patients with localised prostate cancer: 3-year outcomes of a prospective Phase I study. BJU Int 2020;127:544–552.
    1. Nair S, Hatiboglu G, Relle J, et al. . PD17-03 Five-year outcomes from a prospective Phase I study of MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2020;203:e369–e370. (conference abstract)
    1. Anttinen M, Mäkelä P, Suomi V, et al. . Feasibility of MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound for lesion-targeted ablation of prostate cancer. Scand J Urol 2019;53:295–302.
    1. Anttinen M, Mäkelä P, Viitala A, et al. . Salvage magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for localized radiorecurrent prostate cancer: 12-month functional and oncological results. Eur Urol Open Sci 2020;22:79–87.
    1. Anttinen M, Mäkelä P, Nurminen P, et al. . Palliative MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for symptomatic locally advanced prostate cancer. Scand J Urol 2020;54:481–486.
    1. Elterman D, Li W, Hatiboglu G, et al. . Relief of lower urinary tract symptoms after MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for localized prostate cancer: Subgroup analyses in patients with concurrent cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 2021;35:497–505.
    1. Lebastchi AH, George AK, Polascik TJ, et al. . Standardized nomenclature and surveillance methodologies after focal therapy and partial gland ablation for localized prostate cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Consensus. Eur Urol 2020;78:371–378.
    1. Wilt T, Jones K, Barry M, et al. . Prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2017;377:132–142.
    1. Nair SM, Stern N, Dewar M, et al. . Salvage open radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer following MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) of the prostate: Feasibility and efficacy. Scand J Urol 2020;54:215–219.
    1. Singh S, Moore CM, Punwani S, et al. . Long-term biopsy outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021;24:612–622.
    1. Roach M, Hanks G, Thames H, et al. . Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: Recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:965–974.
    1. Hamilton AS, Stanford JL, Gilliland FD, et al. . Health outcomes after external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2517–2526.
    1. Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, et al. . Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 2000;283:354–360.
    1. Borges RC, Tourinho-Barbosa RR, Glina S, et al. . Impact of focal versus whole gland ablation for prostate cancer on sexual function and urinary continence. J Urol 2021;205:129–136.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться