Text-message reminders increase uptake of routine breast screening appointments: a randomised controlled trial in a hard-to-reach population

R S Kerrison, H Shukla, D Cunningham, O Oyebode, E Friedman, R S Kerrison, H Shukla, D Cunningham, O Oyebode, E Friedman

Abstract

Background: There is a need for interventions to promote uptake of breast screening throughout Europe.

Methods: We performed a single-blind randomised controlled trial to test whether text-message reminders were effective. Two thousand two hundred and forty women receiving their first breast screening invitation were included in the study and randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive either a normal invitation only (n=1118) or a normal invitation plus a text-message reminder 48 h before their appointment (n=1122).

Findings: In the intention-to-treat analysis, uptake of breast screening was 59.1% among women in the normal invitation group and 64.4% in the text-message reminder group (χ(2)=6.47, odds ratio (OR): 1.26, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.05-1.48, P=0.01). Of the 1122 women assigned to the text-message reminder group, only 456 (41%) had a mobile number recorded by their GP and were thereby sent a text. In the per-protocol analysis, uptake by those in the control group who had a mobile number recorded on the GP system was 59.77% and by those in the intervention group who were sent a reminder 71.7% (χ(2)=14.12, OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.29-2.26, P<0.01).

Interpretation: Sending women a text-message reminder before their first routine breast screening appointment significantly increased attendance. This information can be used to allocate resources efficiently to improve uptake without exacerbating social inequalities.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Basic design of the study and number of participants randomised.

References

    1. American Cancer Society 2012. Breast cancer survival rates by stage Available at: last accessed 29 January 2015.
    1. Aro A, de Konin H, Absetz P, Schreck M. Two distinct groups of non-atteders in an organised mammography screening programme. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;70:145–153.
    1. Baysal H, Gozum S. Effects of health beliefs about mammography and breast cancer and telephone reminders on re-screening in Turkey. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2011;12:1445–1450.
    1. Berner A, Alwash R, Miller C, Denic S, Dunn E. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to breast cancer screening: A survey of Arabic women. J Cancer Educ. 2001;16:215–220.
    1. Bouchardy C, Verkooijen H, Fioretta G. Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer. 2006;119 (1:145–151.
    1. Cohen C, Coyned K, Mandalia S, Waters A, Sullivan A. Time to use text reminders in genitourinary medicine clinics. Int J STD AIDS. 2007;19:12–13.
    1. Crump S, Mayberry R, Taylor B, Barefield K, Thomas P. Factors related to noncompliance with screening mammogram appointments among low-income African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:237–246.
    1. Ferlay J, Héry C, Autier P, Sankaranarayanan R. Breast Cancer Epidemiology – Global Burden of Breast Cancer. Springer: Berlin; 2010. pp. 1–19.
    1. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh J, Comber H, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–1403.
    1. Giordano L, on Karsa L, Tomatis M, Majek O, de Wolf C, Lancucki L, Hofvind S, Nyström L, Segnan N, Ponti A, The Eunice Working Group Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organisation, coverage and participation. J Med Screen. 2012;19:72–82.
    1. Goelen G, Clercq G, Hanssens S. A community peer-volunteer telephone reminder call to increase breast cancer-screening attendance. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37:312–317.
    1. Guy R, Hocking J, Wand H, Stott S, Ali H, Kaldor H. How effective are short message service reminders at increasing clinic attendance? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:614–632.
    1. Hanauer D, Wentzell K, Laffel N, Laffel L. Computerized Automated Reminder Diabetes System (CARDS): E-mail and SMS cell phone text messaging reminders to support diabetes management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11:99–106.
    1. Huang E, Cheng S, Dressman H, Pittman J, Tsou M, Horng C, Bild A, Iversen E, Liao M, Chen C, West M, Nevins J, Haung A. Gene expression predictors of breast cancer outcomes. Lancet. 2003;361 (1:590–596.
    1. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 2012;380:1778–1786.
    1. iPlato 2013. iPlato, About us 2013. Available at last accessed 29 January 2015.
    1. Jensen L, Pedersen A, Andersen B, Vedsted P. Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening-population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:1–9.
    1. Kharbanda A, Stockwell M, Fox H, Rickert V. Text4Health: a qualitative evaluation of parental readiness for text-message immunization reminders. Am J Public Health. 2009;99 (2:176–178.
    1. Lakkis N, Aefeh A, El-Zein Y, Mahmassani D, Hamadeh G. The effect of two types of SMS-texts on the uptake of screening mammogram: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2011;53:325–327.
    1. Lynge E, Törnberg S, Karsa L, Segnan N, Delden J. Determinants of successful implementation of population-based cancer screening programmes. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:743–748.
    1. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes 2012. NHS Breast Screening Programme Annual Review: 2012. Available at last accessed 29 January 2015.
    1. Ofcom 2012. Facts and figures. Available at last accessed 29 January 2015.
    1. Office for National Statistics . 2011 Census: Ethnic Group, Local Authorities in England and Wales. Office for National Statistics; 2012.
    1. Onitilo A, Engel J, Greenlee R, Mukesh B. Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival. J Clin Med Res. 2009;7:4–13.
    1. Shohaimi S, Luben R, Wareham N, Day N, Bingham S, Welch A, Oakes S, Shaw K-T. Residential area deprivation predicts smoking independently of individual educational level and occupational social class: a cross sectional study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Investigation into Cancer (Epic-Norfolk) J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:270–276.
    1. Shohaimi S, Welch A, Bingham S, Luben R, Day N, Wareham N, Khaw K-T. Residential area deprivation predicts fruit and vegetable consumption independently of individual educational level and occupational social class: a cross sectional study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Investigation into Cancer (Epic-Norfolk) J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:686–691.
    1. Spadea T, Bellini S, Kunst A, Stirbu I, Costa G. The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups. Prev Med. 2007;50:159–164.
    1. Sutton S, Bickler G, Sancho-Aldridge J, Saidi G. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in London. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994;48:65–73.
    1. Taplin S, Barlow W, Ludman E, MacLehos R, Meyer D, Seger D, Herta D, Chin C, Curry S. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomised study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;92:233–242.
    1. Vernon S, La Ville E, Jackson G. Participation in breast screening programs: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30 (1:107–118.
    1. Walton J. Invitation management initiative to improve uptake of breast cancer screening in an urban UK Primary Care Trust. J Med Screen. 2009;16:81–84.
    1. Witte R, Witte J.2013Statistics9th edn321–345.Wiley: West Sussex

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться