The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions

Susan Michie, Maartje M van Stralen, Robert West, Susan Michie, Maartje M van Stralen, Robert West

Abstract

Background: Improving the design and implementation of evidence-based practice depends on successful behaviour change interventions. This requires an appropriate method for characterising interventions and linking them to an analysis of the targeted behaviour. There exists a plethora of frameworks of behaviour change interventions, but it is not clear how well they serve this purpose. This paper evaluates these frameworks, and develops and evaluates a new framework aimed at overcoming their limitations.

Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases and consultation with behaviour change experts were used to identify frameworks of behaviour change interventions. These were evaluated according to three criteria: comprehensiveness, coherence, and a clear link to an overarching model of behaviour. A new framework was developed to meet these criteria. The reliability with which it could be applied was examined in two domains of behaviour change: tobacco control and obesity.

Results: Nineteen frameworks were identified covering nine intervention functions and seven policy categories that could enable those interventions. None of the frameworks reviewed covered the full range of intervention functions or policies, and only a minority met the criteria of coherence or linkage to a model of behaviour. At the centre of a proposed new framework is a 'behaviour system' involving three essential conditions: capability, opportunity, and motivation (what we term the 'COM-B system'). This forms the hub of a 'behaviour change wheel' (BCW) around which are positioned the nine intervention functions aimed at addressing deficits in one or more of these conditions; around this are placed seven categories of policy that could enable those interventions to occur. The BCW was used reliably to characterise interventions within the English Department of Health's 2010 tobacco control strategy and the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence's guidance on reducing obesity.

Conclusions: Interventions and policies to change behaviour can be usefully characterised by means of a BCW comprising: a 'behaviour system' at the hub, encircled by intervention functions and then by policy categories. Research is needed to establish how far the BCW can lead to more efficient design of effective interventions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The COM-B system - a framework for understanding behaviour.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Behaviour Change Wheel.

References

    1. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L. et al.Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Medical care. 2001;39(8 Suppl 2):II2–45.
    1. Summerbell C, Waters E, Edmunds L, Kelly S, Brown T, Campbell K. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005. p. CD001871.
    1. Coleman T. Do financial incentives for delivering health promotion counselling work? Analysis of smoking cessation activities stimulated by the quality and outcomes framework. BMC public health. 2010;10:167. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-167.
    1. Michie S, Abraham C, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Hardeman W, Johnston M. Methods for strengthening evaluation and implementation: specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol. Implement Sci. in press .
    1. Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombroski SU, Bishop A, French DP. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours. The CALO-RE taxonomy Psychology and Health. in press .
    1. Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009;4:40. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-40.
    1. West R. Theory of Addiction. Oxford: Blackwells; 2006.
    1. Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-14.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
    1. Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010;29(1):1–8.
    1. Institute for Government. MINDSPACE; Influencing behaviour through public policy. Institute for Government, the Cabinet Office; 2010.
    1. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. EPOC resources for review authors. 2010.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Behaviour change at population, community and individual levels (Public Health Guidance 6) London NICE; 2007.
    1. Information Centre. Statistics on NHS Stop-Smoking Services 2009/10. London: Department of Health; 2010.
    1. Johnston M, Dixon D. Current issues and new directions in psychology and health: What happened to behaviour in the decade of behaviour? Psychology and Health. 2008;23(5):509–13. doi: 10.1080/08870440701816728.
    1. Bartholomew L, Parcel G, Kok G, Gottlieb N. Planning Health Promotion Programs: Intervention Mapping. San Francisco Jossey-Bass; 2011.
    1. West R, Walia A, Hyder N, Shahab L, Michie S. Behavior change techniques used by the English Stop Smoking Services and their associations with short-term quit outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(7):742–7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq074.
    1. Mook D. Motivation: The Organization of Action. New York; London W.W.Norton & Company; 1995.
    1. Fishbein M, Triandis H, Kanfer F, Becker M, Middlestadt S, Eichler A. In: Handbook of Health Psychology. Baum A, Revenson T, Singer J, editor. Imahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. Factors influencing behaviour and behaviour change; pp. 3–17.
    1. Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(3):220–47. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1.
    1. Anon. Prisma: Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. 2009.
    1. Department of Health. A Smoke-free Future: A comprehensive Tobacco Control Strategy for England. London; 2010.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Obesity: the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2006.
    1. Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004;82(10):724–31. discussion 32.
    1. Schuster RJ, Tasosa J, Terwoord NA. Translational research--implementation of NHLBI Obesity Guidelines in a primary care community setting: the Physician Obesity Awareness Project. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2008;12(10):764S–9S.
    1. Gilles ME, Strayer LJ, Leischow R, Feng C, Menke JM, Sechrest L. Awareness and implementation of tobacco dependence treatment guidelines in Arizona: Healthcare Systems Survey 2000. Health research policy and systems/BioMed Central. 2008;6:13.
    1. Abraham C, Kok G, Schaalma H, Luszczynska A. In: The International Association of Applied Psychology Handbook of Applied Psychology. Martin P, Cheung F, Kyrios M, Littlefield L, Knowles L, Overmier M, editor. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Health Promotion.
    1. Cohen DA, Scribner R. An STD/HIV prevention intervention framework. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2000;14(1):37–45. doi: 10.1089/108729100318118.
    1. DEFRA. A Framework for Pro-Environmental Behaviours: Report. London: Defra; 2008.
    1. Dunton GF, Cousineau M, Reynolds KD. The intersection of public policy and health behavior theory in the physical activity arena. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(Suppl 1):S91–8.
    1. Geller S, Berry T, Ludwig T, Evans R, Gilmore M, Clarke S. A conceptual framework for developing and evaluating behavior change interventions for injury control. Health Educ Res. 1990;5(2):125–37. doi: 10.1093/her/5.2.125.
    1. Goel P, Ross-Degnan D, Berman P, Soumerai S. Retail pharmacies in developing countries: a behavior and intervention framework. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(8):1155–61. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00388-6.
    1. Knott D, Muers S, Aldridge S. Achieving Culture Change: A Policy Framework Strategy Unit. 2008.
    1. Leeman J, Baernholdt M, Sandelowski M. Developing a theory-based taxonomy of methods for implementing change in practice. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(2):191–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04207.x.
    1. Maibach EW, Abroms LC, Marosits M. Communication and marketing as tools to cultivate the public's health: a proposed "people and places" framework. BMC public health. 2007;7(88)
    1. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Public Health: ethical issues; a guide to the report. Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2007.
    1. Perdue WC, Mensah GA, Goodman RA, Moulton AD. A legal framework for preventing cardiovascular diseases. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(5 Suppl 1):139–45.
    1. Population Services International. PSI Behaviour Change Framework "Bubbles". Washington DC; 2004.
    1. Vlek C. Essential psychology for environmental policy making. International Journal of Psychology. 2000;35:153–67. doi: 10.1080/002075900399457.
    1. Walter I, Nutley S, Davies H. Developing a taxonomy of interventions used to increase the impact of research. St Andrews University of St Andrews; 2003.
    1. West R. Tobacco control: present and future. Br Med Bull. 2006;77-78:123–36. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldl012.
    1. White P. PETeR: a universal model for health interventions. 2010.
    1. West R, Michie S. Behaviour change: the importance of seeing the whole picture and a critique of 'Nudge': Submission to the House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee Call for Evidence: Behaviour Change. London House of Lords; 2010.
    1. Featherstone H, Reed H, Jarvis M, Michie S, Gilmour A, West R, APPG Enquiry into the effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Tobacco Control: Submission to the Spending Review and Public Health White Paper Consultation Process. London: Action on Smpoking and Health; 2010.
    1. Thaler R, Sunstein C. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. Boston Yale University Press; 2008.
    1. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28(6):690–701.
    1. Michie S, Churchill S, West R. Identifying Evidence-Based Competences Required to Deliver Behavioural Support for Smoking Cessation. Ann Behav Med. 2010.
    1. Michie S, Hyder N, Walia A, West R. Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors. 2010.
    1. McEwen A, West R, Preston A. Triggering anti-smoking advice by GPs: mode of action of an intervention stimulating smoking cessation advice by GPs. Patient education and counseling. 2006;62(1):89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.008.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться