Efficacy and Safety of Pergoveris in Assisted Reproductive Technology--ESPART: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment

P Humaidan, J Schertz, R Fischer, P Humaidan, J Schertz, R Fischer

Abstract

Introduction: The results of a recent meta-analysis showed that adding recombinant human luteinising hormone (r-hLH) to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) for ovarian stimulation was beneficial in poor responders, resulting in a 30% relative increase in the clinical pregnancy rate compared with r-hFSH monotherapy. However, a limitation of the meta-analysis was that the included studies used heterogeneous definitions of poor ovarian response (POR). Furthermore, the use of r-hLH supplementation during ovarian stimulation is a topic of ongoing debate, and well-designed, adequately powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trials in this setting are warranted. Therefore, the objective of the ESPART trial is to explore the possible superiority of a fixed-dose combination of r-hFSH plus r-hLH over r-hFSH monotherapy in patients with POR, as per a definition aligned with the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Bologna criteria.

Methods and analysis: Phase III, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Approximately 946 women aged 18-<41 years from 18 countries will be randomised (1:1) to receive a fixed-dose combination of r-hFSH plus r-hLH in a 2:1 ratio (Pergoveris) or r-hFSH monotherapy (GONAL-f). The primary end point is the total number of retrieved oocytes per participant. Secondary end points include: ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Safety end points include: incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and of adverse events and serious adverse events.

Ethics and dissemination: The study will be performed in accordance with ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, with the International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice guidelines and all applicable regulatory requirements. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to entry. The results of this study will be publically disseminated.

Trial registration numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02047227; EudraCT Number: 2013-003817-16; Clinical Trial Protocol Number: EMR200061-005 V.3.0, 15 April 2014.

Keywords: REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

References

    1. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ART Fact Sheet 2014. (accessed 19 Dec 2014).
    1. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine B, Alabama. Gonadotropin preparations: past, present, and future perspectives. Fertil Steril 2008;90(5 Suppl):S13–20.
    1. Jenkins JM, Davies DW, Devonport H et al. . Comparison of ‘poor’ responders with ‘good’ responders using a standard buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin regime for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1991;6:918–21.
    1. Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG et al. . Recombinant LH supplementation to recombinant FSH during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14:14–25. 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60758-4
    1. Lehert P, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA et al. . Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:17 10.1186/1477-7827-12-17
    1. Hill MJ, Levens ED, Levy G et al. . The use of recombinant luteinizing hormone in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques with advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012;97:1108–14.e1 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.130
    1. Oliveira JB, Mauri AL, Petersen CG et al. . Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulation hormone during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-agonist protocol: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24:67–75. 10.1007/s10815-006-9095-4
    1. Kolibianakis EM, Kalogeropoulou L, Griesinger G et al. . Among patients treated with FSH and GnRH analogues for in vitro fertilization, is the addition of recombinant LH associated with the probability of live birth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:445–52. 10.1093/humupd/dmm008
    1. Xiong Y, Bu Z, Dai W et al. . Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:109 10.1186/1477-7827-12-109
    1. Legro RS, Kunselman AR. A good meta-analysis is hard to find. Fertil Steril 2012;97:1048–9. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.041
    1. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC et al. . ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1616–24. 10.1093/humrep/der092
    1. Polyzos NP, Devroey P. A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril 2011;96:1058–61.e7 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048
    1. Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D'Anna R et al. . Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new?. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:352098 10.1155/2014/352098
    1. Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Motrenko T et al. . LH pretreatment as a novel strategy for poor responders. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:926172 10.1155/2014/926172
    1. Polyzos NP, Blockeel C, Verpoest W et al. . Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2012;27:3481–6. 10.1093/humrep/des318
    1. Polyzos NP, De Vos M, Corona R et al. . Addition of highly purified HMG after corifollitropin alfa in antagonist-treated poor ovarian responders: a pilot study. Hum Reprod 2013;28:1254–60. 10.1093/humrep/det045
    1. Xu B, Li Z, Yue J et al. . Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone administration in patients with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e99858 10.1371/journal.pone.0099858
    1. Jirge PR, Chougule SM, Gavali VG et al. . Impact of dehydroepiandrosterone on clinical outcome in poor responders: a pilot study in women undergoing in vitro fertilization, using bologna criteria. J Hum Reprod Sci 2014;7:175–80. 10.4103/0974-1208.142477
    1. Papathanasiou A. Implementing the ESHRE ‘poor responder’ criteria in research studies: methodological implications. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1835–8. 10.1093/humrep/deu135
    1. De Placido G, Alviggi C, Perino A et al. . Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2005;20:390–6. 10.1093/humrep/deh625
    1. Ruvolo G, Bosco L, Pane A et al. . Lower apoptosis rate in human cumulus cells after administration of recombinant luteinizing hormone to women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization procedures. Fertil Steril 2007;87:542–6. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.059
    1. Barrenetxea G, Agirregoikoa JA, Jimenez MR et al. . Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2008;89:546–53. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.088
    1. Brunet C, Dechanet C, Reyftmann I et al. . Impact of r-LH supplementation on the estradiol level during ovarian stimulation for IVF: a randomized prospective study. Fertil Steril 2009;92(Suppl):S240 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.1595
    1. Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Fishel S et al. . Better implantation rate overimposing recombinant LH (Luveris) on recombinant FSH (Gonal F) in multiple follicular stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod 2002;17(Suppl 1):134 10.1093/humrep/17.1.134
    1. Buhler KF, Fischer R. Recombinant human LH supplementation versus supplementation with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol: a matched case-control study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2012;28:345–50. 10.3109/09513590.2011.633128
    1. Jeppesen JV, Kristensen SG, Nielsen ME et al. . LH-receptor gene expression in human granulosa and cumulus cells from antral and preovulatory follicles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E1524–31. 10.1210/jc.2012-1427
    1. Electronic Medicines Compendium. GONAL-f 450 IU (33 mcg) pen Summary of Product Characteristics (Merck Serono) 2014. (accessed 17 Dec 2014).
    1. IVF Worldwide. Survey results: poor responders: How to define, diagnose and treat? Results of 124,700 IVF treatment cycles (196 centres from 45 countries) (Leong, M. and Patrizio, P.) 2010. (accessed 17 Dec 2014).

Source: PubMed

Подписаться