Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population

Nicholas Pettit, DuyKhanh Ceppa, Patrick Monahan, Nicholas Pettit, DuyKhanh Ceppa, Patrick Monahan

Abstract

Introduction: A suspected diagnosis of cancer through an emergency department (ED) visit is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the rate at which ED patients attend cancer screenings for lung, colorectal (CRC), and breast cancers based on national guidelines set forth by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Patients were randomly approached in the Eskenazi Hospital ED between August 2019-February 2020 and were surveyed to determine whether they would be eligible and had attended lung, CRC, and breast cancer screenings, as well as their awareness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Patients who were English-speaking and ≥18 years old, and who were not critically ill or intoxicated or being seen for acute decompensated psychiatric illness were offered enrollment. Enrolled subjects were surveyed to determine eligibility for lung, colorectal, and breast cancer screenings based on guidelines set by the USPSTF. No cancer screenings were actually done during the ED visit.

Results: A total of 500 patients were enrolled in this study. More participants were female (54.4%), and a majority were Black (53.0%). Most participants had both insurance (80.2%) and access to primary care (62.8%). Among the entire cohort, 63.0% identified as smokers, and 62.2% (140/225) of the 50- to 80-year-old participants qualified for lung cancer screening. No patients were screened for lung cancer in this cohort (0/225). Only 0.6% (3/500) were aware that LDCT was the preferred method for screening. Based on pack years, 35.5% (32/90) of the patients who were 40-49 years old and 6.7% (6/90) of those 30-39 years old would eventually qualify for screening. Regarding CRC screening, 43.6% (218/500) of the entire cohort was eligible. However, of those patients only 54% (118/218) had been screened. Comparatively, 77.7% (87/112) of the eligible females had been screened for breast cancer, but only 54.5% (61/112) had been screened in the prior two years.

Conclusion: Many ED patients are not screened for lung/colorectal/breast cancers even though many are eligible and have reported access to primary care. This study demonstrates an opportunity and a need to address cancer screening in the ED.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.

References

    1. Zhou Y, Abel GA, Hamilton W, et al. Diagnosis of cancer as an emergency: a critical review of current evidence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:45–56.
    1. Sassi F, Luft HS, Guadagnoli E. Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in female breast cancer: screening rates and stage at diagnosis. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(12):2165–72.
    1. Hiom SC. Diagnosing cancer earlier: reviewing the evidence for improving cancer survival. Br J Cancer. 2015;112
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. A & B Recommendations. 2002. [Accessed August 4, 2022]. Available at: .
    1. Ito Fukunaga M, Wiener RS, Slatore CG. The 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Lung Cancer Screening: the more things stay the same…. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(5):684–6.
    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409.
    1. Adler D, Abar B, Chiao E. Emergency department-based cancer screening interventions. Emerg Cancer Care. 2022:1.
    1. Carethers JM, Sengupta R, Blakey R, et al. Disparities in cancer Ppevention in the COVID-19 era. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020;13(11):893–6.
    1. Okereke IC, Nishi S, Zhou J, et al. Trends in lung cancer screening in the United States, 2016–2017. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(3):873–81.
    1. NIH. Colorectal Cancer Screening. 2022. [Accessed August 4, 2022]. Available at: .
    1. NIH. Colorectal Cancer Screening. 2022. [Accessed August 4, 2022]. Available at: .
    1. Schütte S, Dietrich D, Montet X, et al. Participation in lung cancer screening programs: Are there gender and social differences? A systematic review. Public Health Rev. 2018;39:23.
    1. de Klerk CM, Gupta S, Dekker E, et al. Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide. Gut. 2018;67(4):679–87.
    1. Warren Andersen S, Blot WJ, Lipworth L, et al. Association of race and socioeconomic status with colorectal cancer screening, colorectal cancer risk, and mortality in Southern US adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12):e1917995.
    1. Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965–77.
    1. Anastasi N, Lusher J. The impact of breast cancer awareness interventions on breast screening uptake among women in the United Kingdom: A systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2019;24(1):113–24.
    1. Kennedy MPT, Cheyne L, Darby M, et al. Lung cancer stage-shift following a symptom awareness campaign. Thorax. 2018;73(12):1128–36.
    1. Mercer MP, Singh MK, Kanzaria HK. Reducing emergency department length of stay. JAMA. 2019;321(14):1402–3.
    1. van der Veen D, Remeijer C, Fogteloo AJ, et al. Independent determinants of prolonged emergency department length of stay in a tertiary care centre: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):81.
    1. Haukoos JS, Lyons MS, Rothman RE. The evolving landscape of HIV screening in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(1):54–6.
    1. Adler D, Abar B, Wood N, et al. An intervention to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening among emergency department patients: results of a randomized pilot study. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(6):836–43.
    1. Lemhoefer C, Rabe GL, Wellmann J, et al. Emergency department-initiated tobacco control: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14:E89.
    1. Maskell K, McDonald P, Paudyal P. Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: a cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(677):e869–e876.
    1. Samuels EA, Baird J, Yang ES, et al. Adoption and utilization of an emergency department naloxone distribution and peer recovery coach consultation program. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26(2):160–73.
    1. Rocovich C, Patel T. Emergency department visits: Why adults choose the emergency room over a primary care physician visit during regular office hours? World J Emerg Med. 2012;3(2):91–7.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться