How effective are family-based and institutional nutrition interventions in improving children's diet and health? A systematic review

Andrew P Black, Katina D'Onise, Robyn McDermott, Hassan Vally, Kerin O'Dea, Andrew P Black, Katina D'Onise, Robyn McDermott, Hassan Vally, Kerin O'Dea

Abstract

Background: Effective strategies to improve dietary intake in young children are a priority to reduce the high prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases in adulthood. This study aimed to assess the impact of family-based and school/preschool nutrition programs on the health of children aged 12 or younger, including the sustainability of these impacts and the relevance to socio-economic inequalities.

Methods: A systematic review of literature published from 1980 to December 2014 was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials involving families with children aged up to 12 years in high income countries were included. The primary outcomes were dietary intake and health status. Results were presented in a narrative synthesis due to the heterogeneity of the interventions and outcomes.

Results: The systematic search and assessment identified 39 eligible studies. 82% of these studies were set in school/preschools. Only one school study assessed the impact of involving parents systematically. The family-based programs which provided simple positive dietary advice to parents and regular follow-up reduced fat intake significantly. School and family-based studies, if designed and implemented well, increased F&V intake, particularly fruit. Effective school-based programs have incorporated role-models including peers, teachers and heroic figures, rewards and increased access to healthy foods. School nutrition programs in disadvantaged communities were as effective as programs in other communities.

Conclusions: Family and school nutrition programs can improve dietary intake, however evidence of the long-term sustainability of these impacts is limited. The modest overall impact of even these successful programs suggest complementary nutrition interventions are needed to build a supportive environment for healthy eating generally.

Keywords: Children; Family-based; Nutrition programs; School/Preschool.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of search results

References

    1. Rangan AM, Schindeler S, Hector DJ, et al. Consumption of 'extra' foods by Australian adults: types, quantities and contribution to energy and nutrient intakes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(7):865–871. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2008.51.
    1. CSIRO Preventative Health National Research Flagship, University of South Australia. 2007 Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Main Findings. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2007.
    1. Hall JN, Moore S, Harper SB, et al. Global Variability in Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):402–409. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.029.
    1. Rehm CD, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. The quality and monetary value of diets consumed by adults in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(5):1333–1339. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.015560.
    1. Hamer M, Mishra GD. Dietary patterns and cardiovascular risk markers in the UK Low Income Diet and Nutrition Survey. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;20(7):491–497. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.05.002.
    1. Kant AK. Reported consumption of low-nutrient-density foods by American children and adolescents: nutritional and health correlates, NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(8):789–796. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.8.789.
    1. Diethelm K, Jankovic N, Moreno LA, et al. Food intake of European adolescents in the light of different food-based dietary guidelines: results of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(03):386–398. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011001935.
    1. Moore LV, Thompson FE. Adults Meeting Fruit and Vegetable Intake Recommendations—United States, 2013. MMWR. 2015;64(26):709–713.
    1. Bazzano LA, Li TY, Joshipura KJ, et al. Intake of fruit, vegetables, and fruit juices and risk of diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(7):1311–1317. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0080.
    1. World Health Organisation . Global Health Risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organisation, Department of Health Statistics and Informatics; 2009.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia's Health 2010. Australia’s health series no. 12. Cat. no. AUS 122. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2010.
    1. Huang RC, Mori TA, Burke V, et al. Synergy between adiposity, insulin resistance, metabolic risk factors, and inflammation in adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(4):695–701. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1917.
    1. Strong JP, Malcom GT, McMahan C, et al. Prevalence and extent of atherosclerosis in adolescents and young adults: Implications for prevention from the pathobiological determinants of atherosclerosis in youth study. JAMA. 1999;281(8):727–735. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.8.727.
    1. Foltz JL, May AL, Belay B, et al. Population-Level Intervention Strategies and Examples for Obesity Prevention in Children. Annu Rev Nutr. 2012;32:391–415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071811-150646.
    1. Waters E, de Silva-Sanigorski A, Burford BJ, et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(12):CD001871.
    1. Wang D, Stewart D. The implementation and effectiveness of school-based nutrition promotion programmes using a health-promoting schools approach: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(6):1082–1100. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003497.
    1. Evans CEL, Christian MS, Cleghorn CL, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(4):889–901. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.030270.
    1. Hendrie GA, Brindal E, Corsini N, et al. Combined Home and School Obesity Prevention Interventions for Children: What Behavior Change Strategies and Intervention Characteristics Are Associated With Effectiveness? Health Educ Behav. 2012;39(2):159–171. doi: 10.1177/1090198111420286.
    1. Mann J, Truswell AS. Essentials of human nutrition. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
    1. Epstein LH, Gordy CC, Raynor HA, et al. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obesity research [serial on the Internet]. 2001;9(3):171–8.
    1. Hall L, Collins CE, Morgan PJ, et al. Children's intake of fruit and selected energy-dense nutrient-poor foods is associated with fathers' intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(7):1039–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.008.
    1. Golley RK, Hendrie GA, Slater A, et al. Interventions that involve parents to improve children's weight-related nutrition intake and activity patterns - what nutrition and activity targets and behaviour change techniques are associated with intervention effectiveness? Obes Rev. 2011;12(2):114–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00745.x.
    1. Hendrie GA, Brindal E, Corsini N, et al. Combined home and school obesity prevention interventions for children: what behavior change strategies and intervention characteristics are associated with effectiveness? Health Educ Behav. 2012;39(2):159–171. doi: 10.1177/1090198111420286.
    1. Wang Y, Cai L, Wu Y, et al. What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(7):547–565. doi: 10.1111/obr.12277.
    1. Brown EC, Buchan DS, Baker JS, et al. A Systematised Review of Primary School Whole Class Child Obesity Interventions: Effectiveness, Characteristics, and Strategies. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4902714.
    1. Van Lippevelde W, Verloigne M, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Does parental involvement make a difference in school-based nutrition and physical activity interventions? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Int J Public Health. 2012;57(4):673–678. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0335-3.
    1. Hingle MD, O'Connor TM, Dave JM, et al. Parental Involvement in Interventions to Improve Child Dietary Intake: A Systematic Review. Prev Med. 2010;51(2):103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.04.014.
    1. Kothandan SK. School based interventions versus family based interventions in the treatment of childhood obesity- a systematic review. Arch Public Health. 2014;72(1):3. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-3.
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from:
    1. Armstrong R, Waters E, Jackson N, et al. Guidelines for Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Version 2. Australia: Melbourne University; 2007.
    1. Kristjansson B, Petticrew M, MacDonald B, et al. School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged students. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [serial on the Internet]. 2007; (1): Available from: .
    1. Collins CE, Burrows TL, Bray J, et al. Effectiveness of parent-centred interventions for the prevention and treatment of childhood overweight and obesity in community settings: A systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2013;11(9):180–257. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2013-709.
    1. Wilson DB. Practical Meta-Analysis Effect Size Calculator. Oslo, Norway: The Campbell Collaboration; 2001. [20/6/2015]; Available from: .
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools . Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University; 2008.
    1. Reynolds KD, Raczynski JM, Binkley D, et al. Design of "High 5": a school-based study to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for reduction of cancer risk. J Cancer Educ. 1998;13(3):169–177.
    1. Reynolds KD, Franklin FA, Binkley D, et al. Increasing the fruit and vegetable consumption of fourth-graders: results from the high 5 project. Prev Med [serial on the Internet]. 2000;30(4):309–19.
    1. Nader PR, Sallis JF, Patterson TL, et al. A family approach to cardiovascular risk reduction: results from the San Diego Family Health Project. Health Educ Q. 1989;16(2):229–244. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600207.
    1. Moore L, Tapper K. The impact of school fruit tuck shops and school food policies on children's fruit consumption: a cluster randomised trial of schools in deprived areas. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(10):926–931. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.070953.
    1. Zask A, Adams JK, Brooks LO, et al. Tooty Fruity Vegie: an obesity prevention intervention evaluation in Australian preschools. Health Prom J Aust [serial on the Internet]. 2012;23(1):10–5.
    1. Andersen R, Biltoft-Jensen A, Christensen T, et al. Dietary effects of introducing school meals based on the New Nordic Diet – a randomised controlled trial in Danish children. The OPUS School Meal Study. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(11):1967–1976. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000634.
    1. Moore L, Moore GF, Tapper K, et al. Free breakfasts in schools: design and conduct of a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Primary School Free Breakfast Initiative in Wales [ISRCTN18336527] BMC Public Health. 2007;7:258. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-258.
    1. Crepinsek MK, Singh A, Bernstein LS, et al. Dietary Effects of Universal-Free School Breakfast: Findings from the Evaluation of the School Breakfast Program Pilot Project. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(11):1796–1803. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.08.013.
    1. Ni Mhurchu C, Gorton D, Turley M, et al. Effects of a free school breakfast programme on children's attendance, academic achievement, and short-term hunger: A stepped-wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial. Australasian Med J. 2011;Conference: 35th Annual Scientific Meeting Joint Annual Scientific Meeting of the Nutrition Society of New Zealand and the Nutrition Society of Australia Queenstown New Zealand. Conference Start: 20111129 Conference End: 20111202. Conference Publication: (var.pagings). 4 (12):805.
    1. Christian MS, Evans CEL, Nykjaer C, et al. Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7.
    1. Bere E, Veierød MB, Bjelland M, et al. Free school fruit--sustained effect 1 year later. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(2):268–275. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh063.
    1. Hendy HM, Williams KE, Camise TS. Kid's Choice Program improves weight management behaviors and weight status in school children. Appetite. 2011;56(2):484–494. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.024.
    1. Perry CL, Bishop DB, Taylor GL, et al. A randomized school trial of environmental strategies to encourage fruit and vegetable consumption among children. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31(1):65–76. doi: 10.1177/1090198103255530.
    1. Kaitosaari T, Rönnemaa T, Viikari J, et al. Low-saturated fat dietary counseling starting in infancy improves insulin sensitivity in 9-year-old healthy children: the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for Children (STRIP) study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(4):781–785. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1523.
    1. Raitakari OT, Rönnemaa T, Järvisalo MJ, et al. Endothelial function in healthy 11-year-old children after dietary intervention with onset in infancy: the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for children (STRIP) Circulation. 2005;112(24):3786–3794. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.583195.
    1. Anderson AS, Porteous LEG, Foster E, et al. The impact of a school-based nutrition education intervention on dietary intake and cognitive and attitudinal variables relating to fruits and vegetables. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(6):650–656. doi: 10.1079/PHN2004721.
    1. Baranowski T, Davis M, Resnicow K, et al. Gimme 5 fruit, juice, and vegetables for fun and health: outcome evaluation.[Erratum appears in Health Educ Behav 2000 Jun;27(3):390] Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(1):96–111. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700109.
    1. Bere E, Veierød MB, Bjelland M, et al. Outcome and process evaluation of a Norwegian school-randomized fruit and vegetable intervention: Fruits and Vegetables Make the Marks (FVMM) Health Educ Res. 2006;21(2):258–267. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh062.
    1. Caballero B, Clay T, Davis SM, et al. Pathways: a school-based, randomized controlled trial for the prevention of obesity in American Indian schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78(5):1030–1038.
    1. Cohen JFW, Kraak VI, Choumenkovitch SF, et al. The CHANGE study: a healthy-lifestyles intervention to improve rural children's diet quality. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(1):48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.08.014.
    1. Evans CE, Ransley JK, Christian MS, et al. A cluster-randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato. Pub Health Nutr [serial on the Internet]. 2013;16(6):1073–81.
    1. Greening L, Harrell KT, Low AK, et al. Efficacy of a school-based childhood obesity intervention program in a rural southern community: TEAM Mississippi Project. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md) [serial on the Internet]. 2011;19(6):1213–9.
    1. Hoffman JA, Franko DL, Thompson DR, et al. Longitudinal behavioral effects of a school-based fruit and vegetable promotion program. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35(1):61–71. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp041.
    1. Horne PJ, Hardman CA, Lowe CF, et al. Increasing parental provision and children's consumption of lunchbox fruit and vegetables in Ireland: the Food Dudes intervention. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(5):613–618. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2008.34.
    1. Kristjansdottir AG, Johannsson E, Thorsdottir I. Effects of a school-based intervention on adherence of 7-9-year-olds to food-based dietary guidelines and intake of nutrients. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(8):1151–1161. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000716.
    1. Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity. The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. CATCH collaborative group. JAMA [serial on the Internet]. 1996;275(10):768–76.
    1. Llargues E, Franco R, Recasens A, et al. Assessment of a school-based intervention in eating habits and physical activity in school children: The AVall study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(10):896–901. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.102319.
    1. Muth ND, Chatterjee A, Williams D, et al. Making an IMPACT: effect of a school-based pilot intervention. N C Med J. 2008;69(6):432–440.
    1. Rush E, Reed P, McLennan S, et al. A school-based obesity control programme: Project Energize. Two-year outcomes. Br J Nutr. 2012;107(4):581–587. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511003151.
    1. Bayer O, von Kries R, Strauss A, et al. Short- and mid-term effects of a setting based prevention program to reduce obesity risk factors in children: a cluster-randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2009;28(2):122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.01.001.
    1. De Bock F, Breitenstein L, Fischer JE. Positive impact of a pre-school-based nutritional intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake: results of a cluster-randomized trial. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(3):466–475. doi: 10.1017/S136898001100200X.
    1. Natale R, Scott SH, Messiah SE, et al. Design and methods for evaluating an early childhood obesity prevention program in the childcare center setting. BMC Public Health [serial on the Internet]. 2013;13:78.
    1. Natale RA, Lopez-Mitnik G, Uhlhorn SB, et al. Effect of a child care center-based obesity prevention program on body mass index and nutrition practices among preschool-aged children. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(5):695–705. doi: 10.1177/1524839914523429.
    1. Vereecken C, Huybrechts I, van Houte H, et al. Results from a dietary intervention study in preschools "Beastly Healthy at School". Int J Public Health. 2009;54(3):142–149. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-8028-2.
    1. Hopper CA, Munoz KD, Gruber MB, et al. A school-based cardiovascular exercise and nutrition program with parent participation: an evaluation study. Child Health Care. 1996;25(3):221–235. doi: 10.1207/s15326888chc2503_5.
    1. Breslin G, Brennan D, Rafferty R, et al. The effect of a healthy lifestyle programme on 8-9 year olds from social disadvantage. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(7):618–624. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301108.
    1. Kain J, Uauy R, Taibo M. Chile's school feeding programme: Targeting experience. Nutr Res. 2002;22(5):599–608. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(01)00377-3.
    1. Perikkou A, Gavrieli A, Kougioufa MM, et al. A Novel Approach for Increasing Fruit ConsumptioninChildren. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(9):1188–1193. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.05.024.
    1. Hardy LL, King L, Kelly B, et al. Munch and Move: Evaluation of a preschool healthy eating and movement skill program. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:80.
    1. Baranowski T, Baranowski JC, Cullen KW, et al. The Fun, Food, and Fitness Project (FFFP): the Baylor GEMS pilot study. Ethnicity & Disease [serial on the Internet]. 2003;13(1 Suppl 1):S30–9.
    1. Cameron AJ, Ball K, Hesketh KD, et al. Variation in outcomes of the Melbourne Infant, Feeding, Activity and Nutrition Trial (InFANT) Program according to maternal education and age. Prev Med. 2014;58(1):58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.021.
    1. Hendrie GA, Golley RK. Changing from regular-fat to low-fat dairy foods reduces saturated fat intake but not energy intake in 4-13-y-old children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(5):1117–1127. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.010694.
    1. Olvera NN, Knox B, Scherer R, et al. A Healthy Lifestyle Program for Latino Daughters and Mothers. Am J Health Educ. 2008;39(5):283–295. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2008.10599052.
    1. Stolley MR, Fitzgibbon ML. Effects of an obesity prevention program on the eating behavior of African American mothers and daughters. Health Educ & Behav [serial on the Internet]. 1997;24(2):152–64.
    1. Tabak RG, Tate DF, Stevens J, et al. Family ties to health program: a randomized intervention to improve vegetable intake in children. J Nutri Educ Behav [serial on the Internet]. 2012;44(2):166–71.
    1. Sterne JA, Davey SG. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? BMJ. 2001;322(7280):226–231. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.226.
    1. Olvera N, Bush JA, Sharma SV, et al. BOUNCE: a community-based mother-daughter healthy lifestyle intervention for low-income Latino families. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md) [serial on the Internet]. 2010;18(Suppl 1):S102–4.
    1. Murphy S, Moore G, Tapper K, et al. Free healthy breakfasts in primary schools: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a policy intervention in Wales, UK. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(2):219–226. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010001886.
    1. Damsgaard CT, Dalskov SM, Laursen RP, et al. Provision of healthy school meals does not affect the metabolic syndrome score in 8-11-year-old children, but reduces cardiometabolic risk markers despite increasing waist circumference. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(11):1826–1836. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514003043.
    1. Dwyer J, Cosentino C, Li D, et al. Evaluating school-based interventions using the Healthy Eating Index. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(2):257–259. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90061-1.
    1. Bere E, Veierod MB, Skare O, et al. Free School Fruit--sustained effect three years later. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:5. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-5.
    1. Nyberg G, Sundblom E, Norman A, et al. Effectiveness of a universal parental support programme to promote healthy dietary habits and physical activity and to prevent overweight and obesity in 6-year-old children: the Healthy School Start Study, a cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116876.
    1. Segal L, Sara Opie R, Dalziel K. Theory! The missing link in understanding the performance of neonate/infant home-visiting programs to prevent child maltreatment: a systematic review. Milbank Q. 2012;90(1):47–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00655.x.
    1. Bere E, Hilsen M, Klepp KI. Effect of the nationwide free school fruit scheme in Norway. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(4):589–594. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510000814.
    1. Erjavec M, Viktor S, Horne P, et al. Implementing a healthy eating programme: changing children's eating habits for life. Community Pract. 2012;85(4):39–42.
    1. National Social Marketing Centre. Food Dudes Overview. National Social Marketing Centre; 2010 [updated 04/04/2011Accessed 6/02/2016]; Available from: .
    1. Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Ni Mhurchu C, Blakely T, Jiang Y, et al. Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(3):736–747. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28742.
    1. Black AP, Vally H, Morris P, et al. Nutritional impacts of a fruit and vegetable subsidy programme for disadvantaged Australian Aboriginal children. Br J Nutr. 2013;110(12):2309–2317. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513001700.
    1. Davis SM, Clay T, Smyth M, et al. Pathways curriculum and family interventions to promote healthful eating and physical activity in American Indian schoolchildren. Prev Med. 2003;37(6 part 2):S24–34.
    1. Himes JH, Ring K, Gittelsohn J, et al. Impact of the Pathways intervention on dietary intakes of American Indian schoolchildren. Prev Med. 2003; 37(6 Pt 2): Available from: .
    1. Campbell KJ, Lioret S, McNaughton SA, et al. A Parent-Focused Intervention to Reduce Infant Obesity Risk Behaviors: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):652–60.
    1. Hendrie G, Sohonpal G, Lange K, et al. Change in the family food environment is associated with positive dietary change in children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(4).
    1. Moore GF, Murphy S, Chaplin K, et al. Impacts of the Primary School Free Breakfast Initiative on socio-economic inequalities in breakfast consumption among 9-11-year-old schoolchildren in Wales. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(6):1280–89.
    1. Natale RA, Messiah SE, Asfour L, et al. Role modeling as an early childhood obesity prevention strategy: effect of parents and teachers on preschool children's healthy lifestyle habits. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014;35(6):378–87.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться