Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Promote Patient-Centered Practice: Building Capacity Among Pediatric Physiotherapists in Rwanda

Monika Mann, Ines Musabyemariya, Linn Harding, Ben Braxley, Monika Mann, Ines Musabyemariya, Linn Harding, Ben Braxley

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assess disability and progress toward functional goals while promoting patient-centered practice. They can be used by health professionals in any specialty and in a multitude of settings. This study reviews implementation strategies and lessons learned in a capacity-building program that took place with pediatric physiotherapists in Rwanda.

Methods: Use of PROMs and patient-centered practice were integrated into 4 consecutive continuing professional development courses offered to 164 participants in Rwanda. We sought to identify a simple generic measure with proven validity in cross-cultural settings. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale was chosen due to its ease of use and ability to measure change in a wide range of patient conditions. Didactic classroom training and clinical site visits were 2 essential pedagogical elements of the capacity-building strategy. Site visits allowed for evaluation of skill levels and facilitation of knowledge transfer to patient care settings. Unique pairs of Rwandan colleagues were trained to serve as coteachers in each course to maximize sustainability of new techniques. This study presents data on a subset of 65 participants who completed a 48-hour pediatric rehabilitation course.

Results: After classroom instruction, 78% of participants were observed independently determining functional limitations with their patients. Additionally, pre- and post-tests indicated that therapists substantially increased their understanding of patient-centered practice after attending courses. Interviews conducted 26 months after the conclusion of the project revealed mixed success in sustainability of the use of PROMs, although perceived confidence remained high.

Conclusion: Challenges in long-term sustainability of new practices call attention to the need to target not only clinicians when introducing new methodologies, but also the Ministry of Health, hospital administration, and university faculty. Lessons learned from this study may be useful to other medical professionals planning capacity-building programs in low- and middle-income countries.

© Mann et al.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Patient-Specific Functional Scale
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Capacity-Building Model Used to Train Physiotherapists in Rwanda
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Capacity-Building Model That Should Have Been Used to Train Physiotherapists in Rwanda

References

    1. Higginson IJ, Carr AJ. Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ. 2001;322:1297–1300. 10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1297.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3 WHO; 2002. Accessed July 5, 2020
    1. Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson IJ; EUROIMPACT. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med. 2014;28(2):158–175. 10.1177/0269216313491619.
    1. Weldring T, Smith SM. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61–68. 10.4137/hsi.s11093.
    1. Ministry of Health, Government of Rwanda. Third Health Sector Strategic Plan, July 2012–June 2018. Accessed June 25, 2020
    1. Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, Miceli E, Shah P. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89(2):125–135. 10.2522/ptj.20080234.
    1. American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 3.0. APTA; 2014.
    1. Moen VP, Drageset J, Eide GE, Klokkerud M, Gjesdal S. Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(2):505–514. 10.1007/s11136-016-1384-5.
    1. Federici S, Meloni F, Mancini A, Lauriola M, Olivetti Belardinelli M. World Health Organisation disability assessment schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(7):553–564. 10.1080/09638280802240498.
    1. Silveira C, Parpinelli M, Pacagnella R, et al. . Validation of the 36-item version of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for assessing women’s disability and functioning associated with maternal morbidity. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017;39(2):44–52. 10.1002/ijgo.12465.
    1. Smedema SM, Ruiz D, Mohr MJ. Psychometric validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0—twelve-item version in persons with spinal cord injuries. Rehabil Res Policy Educ. 2017;31(1):7–20. 10.1891/2168-6653.31.1.7
    1. Sharma S, Palanchoke J, Abbott JH. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Nepali translation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2018;48(8):659–664. 10.2519/jospt.2018.7925.
    1. Heldmann P, Schöttker-Königer T, Schäfer A. Cross-cultural adaption and validity of the “Patient Specific Functional Scale”/Kulturelle Adaption und Validierung der deutschen Version der “Patient Specific Functional Scale.” Int J Heal Prof. 2015;2(1):73–82. 10.1515/ijhp-2015-0002
    1. Dunleavy K, Chevan J, Sander AP, Gasherebuka JD, Mann M. Application of a contextual instructional framework in a continuing professional development training program for physiotherapists in Rwanda. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(13):1600–1608. 10.1080/09638288.2017.1300692.
    1. Dunleavy K, Chevan J, Sander AP, Gasherebuka JD, Mann M. A contextual model for continuing professional development (CPD) to build capacity in low-resource countries: Rwanda. Eur J Physiother. 2017;19(suppl 1):27–28. 10.1080/21679169.2017.1381315
    1. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. . Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
    1. Horn KK, Jennings S, Richardson G, van Vliet D, Hefford C, Abbott JH. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: psychometrics, clinimetrics, and application as a clinical outcome measure. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2012;42(1):30–42. 10.2519/jospt.2012.3727.
    1. Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J, Sohlberg MM, Chevignard M. Proposed criteria for appraising goal attainment scales used as outcome measures in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(1):157–170. 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.424.
    1. Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Galama K, Gorter JW. Goal attainment scaling in paediatric rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(7):550–556. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00550.x.
    1. Varni JW, Limbers CA. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory: measuring pediatric health-related quality of life from the perspective of children and their parents. Pediatr Clin North Am. 200956(4):843–863. 10.1016/j.pcl.2009.05.016.
    1. Ödman PE, Öberg BE. Effectiveness and expectations of intensive training: a comparison between child and youth rehabilitation and conductive education. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(9):561–570. 10.1080/00222930500218821.
    1. Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Health. Provincial and District Hospitals: Standard Operating Procedures for Management of Routine Health Information. Republic of Rwanda; 2016. Accessed June 25, 2020
    1. Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Health. Rwanda Hospital Accreditation Standards. 2nd ed Republic of Rwanda; 2014. Accessed June 25, 2020

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться