Evaluation of lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: comparison of diagnostic performance of ultrasound, MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT

S You, D K Kang, Y S Jung, Y-S An, G S Jeon, T H Kim, S You, D K Kang, Y S Jung, Y-S An, G S Jeon, T H Kim

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound, MRI and fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET)/CT for the diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph node (ALN) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to find out histopathological factors affecting the diagnostic performance of these imaging modalities.

Methods: From January 2012 to November 2014, 191 consecutive patients with breast cancer who underwent NAC before surgery were retrospectively reviewed. We included 139 patients with ALN metastasis that was confirmed on fine needle aspiration or core needle biopsy at initial diagnosis.

Results: After NAC, 39 (28%) patients showed negative conversion of ALN on surgical specimens of sentinel lymph node (LN) or ALN. The sensitivity of ultrasound, MRI and PET/CT was 50% (48/96), 72% (70/97) and 22% (16/73), respectively. The specificity of ultrasound, MRI and PET/CT was 77% (30/39), 54% (21/39) and 85% (22/26), respectively. The Az value of combination of ultrasound and PET/CT was the highest (0.634) followed by ultrasound (0.626) and combination of ultrasound, MRI and PET/CT (0.617). The size of tumour deposit in LN and oestrogen receptor was significantly associated with the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively) and MRI (p = 0.045 and p = 0.036, respectively). The percentage diameter decrease, size of tumour deposit in LN, progesterone receptor, HER2 and histological grade were significantly associated with the diagnostic performance of PET/CT (p = 0.023, p = 0.002, p = 0.036, p = 0.044 and p = 0.008, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, size of tumour deposit within LN was identified as being independently associated with diagnostic performance of ultrasound [odds ratio, 13.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.95-57.96] and PET/CT (odds ratio, 6.47; 95% CI, 1.407-29.737).

Conclusion: Combination of three imaging modalities showed the highest sensitivity, and PET/CT showed the highest specificity for the evaluation of ALN metastasis after NAC. Ultrasound alone or combination of ultrasound and PET/CT showed the highest positive-predictive value. The size of tumour deposit within ALN was significantly associated with diagnostic performance of ultrasound and PET/CT.

Advances in knowledge: This study is about the diagnostic performance of ultrasound, MRI, PET/CT and combination of each imaging modality for the evaluation of metastatic ALN after NAC. Of many histopathological factors, only the size of tumour deposit within ALN was an independent factor associated with the diagnostic performance of ultrasound and PET/CT.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Receiver operating characteristic analysis curves for the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PET, positron emission tomography; US, ultrasound.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A 44-year-old female who had invasive ductal carcinoma with negative estrogen receptor and positive HER2 in the right breast and biopsy confirmed metastatic lymph node in right axilla. Initial ultrasound (a) and MRI (b) showed the axillary lymph node (ALN) showing eccentric cortical thickening >3 mm. Initial positron emission tomography (PET)-CT (c) also showed increased fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose uptake in the right ALN (peak standardized uptake value = 2.8). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) treatment, ultrasound (d) and PET-CT (f) showed no evidence of metastasis in right ALN. However, MRI (e) after NAC showed ALN showing 3-mm eccentric cortical thickening suggesting remaining metastasis.

References

    1. Lee MC, Eatrides J, Chau A, Han G, Kiluk JV, Khakpour N, et al. . Consequences of axillary ultrasound in patients with T2 or greater invasive breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 72–7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1171-4
    1. Nori J, Vanzi E, Bazzocchi M, Bufalini FN, Distante V, Branconi F, et al. . Role of axillary ultrasound examination in the selection of breast cancer patients for sentinel node biopsy. Am J Surg 2007; 193: 16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.02.021
    1. Park SH, Kim MJ, Park BW, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK. Impact of preoperative ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes on surgical management of primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 738–44. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1347-y
    1. Choi YJ, Shin YD, Kang YH, Lee MS, Lee MK, Cho BS, et al. . The effects of preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients in comparison to the conventional imaging study. J Breast Cancer 2012; 15: 441–8. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.441
    1. Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Smethurst HB, Lundgren S, Fjøsne HE, Haraldseth O. Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1464–71. doi: 10.1007/s003300000370
    1. Yoshimura G, Sakurai T, Oura S, Suzuma T, Tamaki T, Umemura T, et al. . Evaluation of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer with MRI. Breast cancer 1999; 6: 249–58. doi: 10.1007/BF02967179
    1. Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Buzdar AU, Hunt KK, Dhingra K, Buchholz TA, et al. . Residual metastatic axillary lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Am J Surg 1998; 176: 502–9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00253-0
    1. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, et al. . Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 1796–804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595
    1. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Hansen NM, Bethke KP, Rademaker AW, Ko CY, et al. . Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and completion axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2946–53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5750
    1. Giuliano AE, Morrow M, Duggal S, Julian TB. Should ACOSOG Z0011 change practice with respect to axillary lymph node dissection for a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer? Clin Exp Metastasis 2012; 29: 687–92. doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9515-z
    1. Rouzier R, Extra JM, Klijanienko J, Falcou MC, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A, et al. . Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1304–10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.5.1304
    1. Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B, et al. ; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1455–61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278932
    1. Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, et al. . Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 609–18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70166-9
    1. Javid S, Segara D, Lotfi P, Raza S, Golshan M. Can breast MRI predict axillary lymph node metastasis in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 1841–6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0934-2
    1. Hieken TJ, Boughey JC, Jones KN, Shah SS, Glazebrook KN. Imaging response and residual metastatic axillary lymph node disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 3199–204. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3118-z
    1. Schipper RJ, Moossdorff M, Beets-Tan RG, Smidt ML, Lobbes MB. Noninvasive nodal restaging in clinically node positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.020
    1. Park SH, Kim EK, Park BW, Kim SI, Moon HJ, Kim MJ. False negative results in axillary lymph nodes by ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 559–67. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313113
    1. Kim JY, Lee SH, Kim S, Kang T, Bae YT. Tumour 18 F-FDG uptake on preoperative PET/CT may predict axillary lymph node metastasis in ER-positive/HER2-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 1172–81. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3452-y
    1. de Ronde JJ, Hannemann J, Halfwerk H, Mulder L, Straver ME, Vrancken Peeters MJ, et al. . Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 119: 119–26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0499-6
    1. Bhargava R, Beriwal S, Dabbs DJ, Ozbek U, Soran A, Johnson RR, et al. . Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institutional experience with 359 cases. Cancer 2010; 116: 1431–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24876
    1. Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, et al. . The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 2329–34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1109
    1. Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, Ibrahim N, Cristofanilli M, Anderson K, et al. . Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 5678–85. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2421
    1. Goldstein NS, Decker D, Severson D, Schell S, Vicini F, Margolis J, et al. . Molecular classification system identifies invasive breast carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 2007; 110: 1687–96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22981

Source: PubMed

Подписаться