An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption

Dennis G A B Oonincx, Joost van Itterbeeck, Marcel J W Heetkamp, Henry van den Brand, Joop J A van Loon, Arnold van Huis, Dennis G A B Oonincx, Joost van Itterbeeck, Marcel J W Heetkamp, Henry van den Brand, Joop J A van Loon, Arnold van Huis

Abstract

Background: Greenhouse gas (GHG) production, as a cause of climate change, is considered as one of the biggest problems society is currently facing. The livestock sector is one of the large contributors of anthropogenic GHG emissions. Also, large amounts of ammonia (NH(3)), leading to soil nitrification and acidification, are produced by livestock. Therefore other sources of animal protein, like edible insects, are currently being considered.

Methodology/principal findings: An experiment was conducted to quantify production of carbon dioxide (CO₂) and average daily gain (ADG) as a measure of feed conversion efficiency, and to quantify the production of the greenhouse gases methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) as well as NH₃ by five insect species of which the first three are considered edible: Tenebrio molitor, Acheta domesticus, Locusta migratoria, Pachnoda marginata, and Blaptica dubia. Large differences were found among the species regarding their production of CO₂ and GHGs. The insects in this study had a higher relative growth rate and emitted comparable or lower amounts of GHG than described in literature for pigs and much lower amounts of GHG than cattle. The same was true for CO₂ production per kg of metabolic weight and per kg of mass gain. Furthermore, also the production of NH₃ by insects was lower than for conventional livestock.

Conclusions/significance: This study therefore indicates that insects could serve as a more environmentally friendly alternative for the production of animal protein with respect to GHG and NH₃ emissions. The results of this study can be used as basic information to compare the production of insects with conventional livestock by means of a life cycle analysis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. IPCC Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. 2007. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: IPCC.
    1. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, et al. Livestock's long shadow; environmental issues and options Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2006. 414
    1. Kroon LJM, Holtslag AAM, Krol MC. Wageningen: Wageningen University; 2009. Inleiding atmosfeer (in Dutch).
    1. de Vries M, de Boer IJM. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science. 2010;128:1–11.
    1. Aarnink AJA, Keen A, Metz JHM, Speelman L, Verstegen MWA. Ammonia emission patterns during the growing periods of pigs housed on partially slatted floors. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 1995;62:105–116.
    1. Wrage N, Velthof GL, van Beusichem ML, Oenema O. Role of nitrifier denitrification in the production of nitrous oxide. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2001;33:1723–1732.
    1. Fabbri C, Valli L, Guarino M, Costa A, Mazzotta V. Ammonia, methane, nitrous oxide and particulate matter emissions from two different buildings for laying hens. Biosystems Engineering. 2007;97:441–455.
    1. Lacey RE, Redwine JS, Parnell CB. 2002 ASAE Annual International Meeting/CIGR XVth World Congress Chicago, Illinois; 2002. Emission factors for broiler production operations: A stochastic modeling approach.
    1. Cole NA, Clark RN, Todd RW, Richardson CR, Gueye A, et al. Influence of dietary crude protein concentration and source on potential ammonia emissions from beef cattle manure. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:722–731.
    1. Thorne PS. Environmental health impacts of concentrated animal feeding operations: Anticipating hazards - Searching for solutions. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007;115:296–297.
    1. Beets WC. The need for an increased use of small and mini-livestock in integrated smallholder farming systems. Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 1997;36:237–245.
    1. Gullan PJ, Cranston PS. Blackwell Publishing; 2005. The insects: an outline of entomology: pp. 10–20.
    1. Nakagaki BJ, DeFoliart GR. Comparison of diets for mass-rearing Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) as a novelty food, and comparison of food conversion efficiency with values reported for livestock. Journal of Economic Entomology. 1991;84:891–896.
    1. Ramos-Elorduy J. Energy supplied by edible insects from Mexico and their nutritional and ecological importance. Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 2008;47:280–297.
    1. Bruins E. Geïllustreerde Terrariumencyclopedie; In: Bruins E, editor. Lisse, The Netherlands: Rebo Productions BV; 2001.
    1. Friederich U, Volland W. Breeding Food Animals: Live Food for Vivarium Animals; In: Friederich U, Volland W, editors. Malabar, Florida: Krieger publishing company; 2004.
    1. Verstegen MWA, Van Der Hel W, Brandsma HA, Henken AM, Bransen AM. The Wageningen respiration unit for animal production research: A description of the equipment and its possibilities. In: Verstegen MWA, Henken AM, editors. Energy metabolism in farm animals: Effects of housing, stress and disease. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1987. pp. 21–48.
    1. Wheeler EF, Casey KD, Zajaczkowski JS, Topper PA, Gates RS, Xin H, Liang Y, Tanaka A. Ammonia emissions from U.S. poultry houses: Part III - Broiler houses. 2003; Research Triangle Park, NC.
    1. Terblanche JS, Chown SL. The effects of temperature, body mass and feeding on metabolic rate in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans centralis. Physiological Entomology. 2007;32:175–180.
    1. Bailey CG, Singh NB. Energy budget for Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera-Noctuidae). Canadian Entomologist. 1977;109:687–693.
    1. Emekci M, Navarro S, Donahaye E, Rindner M, Azrieli A. Respiration of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) at reduced oxygen concentrations. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2004;40:27–38.
    1. Gouveia SM, Simpson SJ, Raubenheimer D, Zanotto FP. Patterns of respiration in Locusta migratoria nymphs when feeding. Physiological Entomology. 2000;25:88–93.
    1. Aidley DJ. Increase in Respiratory Rate during Feeding in Larvae of Armyworm, Spodoptera exempta. Physiological Entomology. 1976;1:73–75.
    1. Armstrong G, Mordue W. Oxygen consumption of flying locusts. Physiological entomology. 1985;10:353–358.
    1. Greenlee KJ, Harrison JF. Development of respiratory function in the American locust Schistocerca americana I. Across-instar effects. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:497–508.
    1. Emekci M, Navarro S, Donahaye E, Rindner M, Azrieli A. Respiration of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) at reduced oxygen concentrations. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2002;38:413–425.
    1. Duncan FD, Krasnov B, McMaster M. Metabolic rate and respiratory gas-exchange patterns in tenebrionid beetles from the Negev Highlands, Israel. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2002;205:791–798.
    1. May ML, Pearson DL, Casey TM. Oxygen-Consumption of Active and Inactive Adult Tiger Beetles. Physiological Entomology. 1986;11:171–179.
    1. Kleiber M. New York, London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1961. The fire of life: an introduction to animal energetics.
    1. Agutter PS, Wheatley DN. Metabolic scaling: Consensus or controversy? Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling. 2004;1
    1. Heusner AA. Energy metabolism and body size I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber's equation a statistical artifact? Respiration Physiology. 1982;48:1–12.
    1. da Silva JKL, Garcia GJM, Barbosa LA. Allometric scaling laws of metabolism. Physics of Life Reviews. 2006;3:229–261.
    1. Lighton JRB, Fielden LJ. Mass scaling of standard metabolism in ticks - a valid case of low metabolic rates in sit-and-wait strategists. Physiological Zoology. 1995;68:43–62.
    1. Chown SL, Marais E, Terblanche JS, Klok CJ, Lighton JRB, et al. Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model. Functional Ecology. 2007;21:282–290.
    1. Prothero JW. Maximal Oxygen-Consumption in Various Animals and Plants. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology a-Physiology. 1979;64:463–466.
    1. Collavo A, Glew RH, Huang Y-S, Chuang L-T, Bosse R, et al. House cricket small-scale farming. In: Paoletti MG, editor. Ecological Implications of Minilivestock: Science publishers, INC; 2005. pp. 519–544.
    1. Slansky Fj. Food utilization by insects: Interpretation of observed differences between dry weight and energy efficiencies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 1985;39:47.
    1. Hackstein JH, Stumm CK. Methane production in terrestrial arthropods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1994;91:5441–5445.
    1. Egert M, Wagner B, Lemke T, Brune A, Friedrich MW. Microbial community structure in midgut and hindgut of the humus-feeding larva of Pachnoda ephippiata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003;69:6659–6668.
    1. Guiziou F, Béline F. In situ measurement of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from broiler houses in France. Bioresource Technology. 2005;96:203–207.
    1. Wathes CM, Holden MR, Sneath RW, White RP, Phillips VR. Concentrations and emission rates of aerial ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide, dust and endotoxin in UK broiler and layer houses. British Poultry Science. 1997;38:14–28.
    1. Chadwick DR, Sneath RW, Phillips VR, Pain BF. A UK inventory of nitrous oxide emissions from farmed livestock. Atmospheric Environment. 1999;33:3345–3354.
    1. Lemke R, Goddard T, Hahn D, Burton D, Ellert B, et al. An inter-laboratory comparison of nitrous oxide analysis in western Canada. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2002;33:2705–2713.
    1. Waldbauer GP. The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in insect physiology. 1968;5:229–288.
    1. Axelsson B, Ágren GI. A correction for food respiration in balancing energy budgets. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 1979;25:260–266.
    1. van Loon JJA, Casas J, Pincebourde S. Nutritional ecology of insect plant-interactions: persistent handicaps and the need for innovative approaches. Oikos. 2005;108:194–201.
    1. Li XZ, Brune A. Transformation and mineralization of soil organic nitrogen by the humivorous larva of Pachnoda ephippiata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Plant and Soil. 2007;301:233–244.
    1. Cabaraux J-F, Philippe F-X, Laitat M, Canart B, Vandenheede M, et al. Gaseous emissions from weaned pigs raised on different floor systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2009;130:86–92.
    1. Groot Koerkamp PWG, Metz JHM, Uenk GH, Phillips VR, Holden MR, et al. Concentrations and emissions of ammonia in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 1998;70:79–95.
    1. Nicks B, Laitat M, Vandenheede M, Desiron A, Verhaeghe C, et al. Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide and water vapor in the raising of weaned pigs on straw-based and sawdust-based deep litters. Animal Research. 2003;52:299–308.
    1. Demmers TGM, Burgess LR, Short JL, Phillips VR, Clark JA, et al. Ammonia emissions from two mechanically ventilated UK livestock buildings. Atmospheric Environment. 1999;33:217–227.
    1. Demmers TGM, Phillips VR, Short LS, Burgess LR, Hoxey RP, et al. SE—Structure and Environment: Validation of ventilation rate measurement methods and the ammonia emission from naturally ventilated dairy and beef buildings in the United Kingdom. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 2001;79:107–116.
    1. Harper LA, Flesch TK, Powell JM, Coblentz WK, Jokela WE, et al. Ammonia emissions from dairy production in Wisconsin. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:2326–2337.
    1. Casey JW, Holden NM. Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional, agri-environmental scheme, and organic Irish suckler-beef units. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2006;35:231–239.
    1. Faulkner WB, Shaw BW. Review of ammonia emission factors for United States animal agriculture. Atmospheric Environment. 2008;42:6567–6574.
    1. Blanes-Vidal V, Hansen MN, Pedersen S, Rom HB. Emissions of ammonia, methane and nitrous oxide from pig houses and slurry: Effects of rooting material, animal activity and ventilation flow. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2008;124:237–244.
    1. Volkova VV, Bailey RH, Wills RW. Salmonella in broiler litter and properties of soil at farm location. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6403.
    1. De Boer IJM. Personal Communication. 2008.
    1. Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM. Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets. Journal of Animal Science. 2005;83:653–661.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться