Development and validation of a five-factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W)

Cindy Meston, Paul Trapnell, Cindy Meston, Paul Trapnell

Abstract

Introduction: This article presents data based on the responses of over 800 women who contributed to the development of the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W).

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive, multifaceted, valid, and reliable self-report measure of women's sexual satisfaction and distress.

Methods: Phase I involved the initial selection of items based on past literature and on interviews of women diagnosed with sexual dysfunction and an exploratory factor analysis. Phase II involved an additional administration of the questionnaire, factor analyses, and refinement of the questionnaire items. Phase III involved administration of the final questionnaire to a sample of women with clinically diagnosed sexual dysfunction and controls.

Results: Psychometric evaluation of the SSS-W conducted in a sample of women meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for female sexual dysfunction and in a control sample provided preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. The ability of the SSS-W to discriminate between sexually functional and dysfunctional women was demonstrated for each of the SSS-W domain scores and total score.

Conclusion: The SSS-W is a brief, 30-item measure of sexual satisfaction and sexual distress, composed of five domains supported by factor analyses: contentment, communication, compatibility, relational concern, and personal concern. It exhibits sound psychometric properties and has a demonstrated ability to discriminate between clinical and nonclinical samples.

References

    1. Blumstein P, Schwartz P. American couples. New York: William Morrow; 1983.
    1. Cupach WR, Comstock J. Satisfaction with sexual communication in marriage: Links to sexual satisfaction and dyadic adjustment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1990;7:179–86.
    1. Edwards JN, Booth A. Sexuality, marriage, and well-being: The middle years. In: Rossi AA, editor. Sexuality across the life course. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. pp. 233–59.
    1. Greenly AM. Faithful attraction: Discovering intimacy, love, and fidelity in American marriage. New York: Doherty; 1991.
    1. Henderson-King DH, Veroff J. Sexual satisfaction and marital well-being in the first years of marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1994;11:509–34.
    1. Aron A, Henkemeyer L. Marital satisfaction and passionate love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1995;12:139–46.
    1. Grote NK, Frieze IH. Remembrance of things past: Perceptions of marital love from its beginnings to the present. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1998;15:91–109.
    1. Yela C. Predictors of and factors related to loving and sexual satisfaction for men and women. Eur Rev Appl Psyc. 2000;50:235–43.
    1. Sprecher S. Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. J Sex Res. 2002;39:190–6.
    1. White L, Keith B. The effect of shift work on the quality and stability of marital relations. J Mar Fam. 1990;52:453–62.
    1. Christopher FS, Sprecher S. Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. J Mar Fam. 2000;62:999–1017.
    1. Larson JH, Anderson SM, Holman TB, Niemann BK. A longitudinal study of the effects of premarital communication, relationship stability, and self-esteem on sexual satisfaction in the first year of marriage. J Sex Marit Ther. 1988;24:193–206.
    1. Lee HT. Variables of subjective sexual desire and satisfaction in a large sample of married couples from North American evangelical Christian congregations. Dissertation abstracts international: Section B: The sciences and engineering. 1995 November;56(5-B)
    1. McCann JR, Biaggio MK. Sexual satisfaction in marriage as a function of life meaning. Arch Sex Behav. 1989;18:59–72.
    1. Song J, Bergen MB, Schumm WR. Sexual satisfaction among Korean-American couples in the Mid-western United States. J Sex Marit Ther. 1995;21:147–58.
    1. Belanger C, Laughrea K, Lafontaine M. The impact of anger on sexual satisfaction in marriage. Can J Hum Sex. 2001;10:91–9.
    1. Bridges SPK. Predicting and describing sexual satisfaction in women: Physical affection in family of origin, sexual initiation and communication, and masturbatory practices. Dissertation abstracts international: Section B: The sciences and engineering. 2000 March;60(8-B)
    1. Supekova M, Bianchi G. Sexual education and satisfaction of sexually more active young people: A qualitative approach. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie. 2000;44:46–76.
    1. Byers ES, Demmons S. Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships. J Sex Res. 1999;36:180–9.
    1. Purnine DM, Carey MP. Interpersonal communication and sexual adjustment: The roles of under-standing and agreement. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65:1017–25.
    1. Trudel G. Sexuality and marital life: Results of a survey. J Sex Marit Ther. 2002;28:229–49.
    1. Huberle DF. The role of assertiveness in female sexuality: A comparative study between sexually assertive and sexually nonassertive women. J Sex Marit Ther. 1991;17:183–90.
    1. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537–44.
    1. Frank E, Anderson C, Rubenstein D. Frequency of sexual dysfunctions in “normal” couples. N Engl J Med. 1978;229:111–5.
    1. Davies S, Katz J, Jackson JL. Sexual desire discrepancies: Effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Arch Sex Behav. 1999;28:553–67.
    1. Renaud C, Byers ES. Sexual and relationship satisfaction in mainland China. J Sex Res. 1997;34:399–410.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4. Washington, DC: Author; 2000. text revision.
    1. Basson R, Leiblum S, Brotto L, Derogatis L, Fourcroy J, Fugl-Meyer K, Graziottin A, Heiman J, Laan E, Meston CM, van Lankveld J, Weijmar Schultz W. Definitions of women’s sexual dysfunction reconsidered: Advocating expansion and revision. J Psychosom Obstet Gynec. 2003;24:221–9.
    1. Kenny D, Acitelli LK, Weiner D. The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships. 2001;8:167–85.
    1. Cupach WR, Metts S. The role of sexual attitude similarity in romantic heterosexual relationships. Personal Relationships. 1995;2:287–300.
    1. Karney BR, Bradbury IN. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psych Bull. 1995;118:3–34.
    1. Weisfeld GE, Russell RJ, Weisfeld CC, Wells PA. Correlates of satisfaction in British marriages. Ethol Sociobio. 1992;13:125–45.
    1. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston CM, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R., Jr The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marit Ther. 2000;26:191–208.
    1. Taylor JR, Rosen RC, Leiblum SR. Self-report assessment of female sexual function: Psychometric evaluation of the brief index of sexual functioning for women. Arch Sex Behav. 1994;23:627–43.
    1. Meston CM. Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder and in Women with Female Orgasmic Disorder. J Sex Marit Ther. 2003;29:39–46.
    1. Locke H, Wallace K. Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage Fam Living. 1959;2:251–5.
    1. Freeston MH, Plechaty M. Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s? Psych Rep. 1997;81:419–34.
    1. Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J. The female distress scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marit Ther. 2002;28:317–30.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться