Distal extension mandibular removable partial denture with implant support

Canan Bural, Begum Buzbas, Sebnem Ozatik, Gulsen Bayraktar, Yusuf Emes, Canan Bural, Begum Buzbas, Sebnem Ozatik, Gulsen Bayraktar, Yusuf Emes

Abstract

This case report describes the fabrication of a distal extension removable partial denture (RPD) of a 65-year-old man with implant support. Loss of fibroelasticity of the peripheral tissues and reduced mandibular vestibular sulcular depth due to a previous surgical resection and radiotherapy at the right side were the main clinical factors that created difficulty for denture retention and stability. The fabrication of a mandibular RPD supported by anterior teeth and two bilaterally placed implants in the molar area to convert from Kennedy Class 1 design to Kennedy Class 3 implant-bounded RPD is reported. Retention and stability of the denture were improved with implant support on the distal extension site of the RPD. The common clinical problems about distally extended RPDs are lack of retention and stability due to the movement around the rotational axis. Dental implant placement to the distal edentulous site minimizes the potential dislodgement of the RPD is popular. Implant-supported RPD can be suggested as an advantageous and cost-effective treatment option for the partially edentulous patients.

Keywords: Dental implant; Kennedy Class I partial edentulous; distal-extension removable partial denture; implant-supported removable partial denture; locator attachment.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Extraoral view before prosthetic treatment (a). Scar tissue and loss of fibroelasticity at the right buccal shelf area due to the surgical tumor resection and radiotherapy (b). No indication of abnormality on the left sight (c)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preoperative intraoral view. Tissue healing at the right maxillary region and 2 left maxillary teeth (a). Mandibular teeth before prosthetic therapy (b)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Preoperative panoramic X-ray view
Figure 4
Figure 4
Implant surgery on the right (a) and left (b) first molar area
Figure 5
Figure 5
Panoramic X-ray view. Osseointegration of the implants at the postoperative 3rd month
Figure 6
Figure 6
Intraoral view of implant site at the postoperative 3rd month. (a) right side (b) left side
Figure 7
Figure 7
Locator abutments connected to the implants (a) right side (b) left side
Figure 8
Figure 8
Final impression with impression copings attached with locator analogs
Figure 9
Figure 9
Working model with locator analogs
Figure 10
Figure 10
Cingulum rests designed on the mandibular anterior teeth
Figure 11
Figure 11
Removable partial denture framework with T-bar clasps on the terminal abutment teeth, lingual plate as a major connector and circular design around the implant abutments
Figure 12
Figure 12
Maxillary complete denture (a) and mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with locator attachments in the intaglio surface (b)
Figure 13
Figure 13
Intraoral view 4 weeks after delivery
Figure 14
Figure 14
Extraoral view after prosthetic treatment (a). Right (b) and left side (c)

References

    1. Gonçalves TM, Campos CH, Garcia RC. Implant retention and support for distal extension partial removable dental prostheses: Satisfaction outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:334–9.
    1. Zancopé K, Abrão GM, Karam FK, Neves FD. Placement of a distal implant to convert a mandibular removable Kennedy class I to an implant-supported partial removable Class III dental prosthesis: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113:528–33-e3.
    1. Bortolini S, Natali A, Franchi M, Coggiola A, Consolo U. Implant-retained removable partial dentures: An 8-year retrospective study. J Prosthodont. 2011;20:168–72.
    1. Ohkubo C, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Hosoi T. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: In vivo assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:1095–101.
    1. Mitrani R, Brudvik JS, Phillips KM. Posterior implants for distal extension removable prostheses: A retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:353–9.
    1. Kono K, Kurihara D, Suzuki Y, Ohkubo C. Pressure distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures with stress-breaking attachments. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58:115–20.
    1. Keltjens HM, Kayser AF, Hertel R, Battistuzzi PG. Distal extension removable partial dentures supported by implants and residual teeth: Considerations and case reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:208–13.
    1. Elsyad MA, Habib AA. Implant-supported versus implant-retained distal extension mandibular partial overdentures and residual ridge resorption: A 5-year retrospective radiographic study in men. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:306–13.
    1. Mijiritsky E, Karas S. Removable partial denture design involving teeth and implants as an alternative to unsuccessful fixed implant therapy: A case report. Implant Dent. 2004;13:218–22.
    1. Verri FR, Pellizzer EP, Rocha EP, Pereira JA. Influence of length and diameter of implants associated with distal extension removable partial dentures. Implant Dent. 2007;16:270–80.
    1. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: A retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:139–44.
    1. de Freitas RF, de Carvalho Dias K, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, Barbosa GA, Ferreira MA. Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:791–8.
    1. ŠCunha LD, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, Falcón-Antenucci RM, Goiato MC. Influence of ridge inclination and implant localization on the association of mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial denture. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:871–5.
    1. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindström H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:405–14.
    1. Bilhan H. In: The role of the dental implant in removable partial dentures. Removable Partial Dentures: A Practitioners' Manual. Sakar O, editor. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2016. pp. 195–208.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться