Meaningful learning: motivations of older adults in serious games

Johnny Salazar Cardona, Jeferson Arango Lopez, Francisco Luis Gutiérrez Vela, Fernando Moreira, Johnny Salazar Cardona, Jeferson Arango Lopez, Francisco Luis Gutiérrez Vela, Fernando Moreira

Abstract

Social sustainability is the generation of significant behaviors through balanced levels of education, learning and awareness so that the population has a good standard of living, achieves self-improvement and supports society. This can be achieved with various strategies, one of which is learning through games, which has gained popularity in recent years due to positive results. This is effectively achieved through serious gaming, which is growing steadily, mostly in education and healthcare. This type of strategy has been typically used in young populations with a transparent interaction with technological processes that facilitate its application. However, one cannot neglect other populations such as the elderly, who may experience a technology gap and may not perceive this type of initiative in the best light. The purpose of this article is to identify the different motivations that can encourage older adults to use serious games to encourage learning processes through technology. For this purpose, different previous research on gaming experiences with older adults has been identified, from which it was possible to categorize a series of factors that motivate this population. Subsequently, we represented these factors by means of a model of motivation for the elderly and, to be able to use it, we have defined a set of heuristics based on this model. Finally, we used the heuristics by means of a questionnaire to evaluate the design of serious gaming for older adults, obtaining positive results for the use of these elements to guide the design and construction of serious games for learning in older adults.

Keywords: Learning; Motivations; Older adults; Serious games; Sustainability.

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Systematic literature review process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Motivational aspects model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
HiGame for the wellness of older adults [69]
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Support and feedback in older adults [89]
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Child avatar which reminds the elderly of their family [98]

References

    1. Piaget, J., Inhelder, B.: Psicologia del niño. (1997).
    1. Seah ETW, Kaufman D, Sauvé L, Zhang F. Play, learn, connect: older adults’ experience with a multiplayer, educational, digital bingo game. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2018;56:675–700. doi: 10.1177/0735633117722329.
    1. Birk, M. V., Friehs, M.A., Mandryk, R.L.: Age-based preferences and player experience: A crowdsourced cross-sectional study. CHI Play 20170-Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Interact. Play. (2017). 10.1145/3116595.3116608.
    1. Subramanian S, Dahl Y, Skjæret Maroni N, Vereijken B, Svanæs D. Assessing motivational differences between young and older adults when playing an exergame. Games Health J. 2020;9:24–30. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2019.0082.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000;55:68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
    1. Tsalapatas H, Heidmann O, Houstis E. A serious game for digital skill building among individuals at risk, promoting employability and social inclusion. In: de Carvalho C, Escudeiro P, Coelho A, editors. Serious Games, Interaction and Simulation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 91–98.
    1. Wilson JP. Serious games: The art and science of games that simulate life. New York: Viking Press. 1970 doi: 10.1177/104687817000100406.
    1. Klabbers JHG. Terminological ambiguity: Game and simulation. Simul Gaming. 2008;40:446–463. doi: 10.1177/1046878108325500.
    1. Connolly TM, Boyle EA, MacArthur E, Hainey T, Boyle JM. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 2012;59:661–686. doi: 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.03.004.
    1. Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J.-P.: LudoScience - Classifying Serious Games: The G/P/S Model (Broacasting our studies), , last Accessed 2022 Jan 06.
    1. Marczewski, A.: Game Thinking. In: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. (ed.) Even Ninja Monkeys Like to Play: Gamification, Game Thinking and Motivational Design. p. 15. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2015)
    1. Dobrovsky A, Borghoff UM, Hofmann M. Applying and augmenting deep reinforcement learning in serious games through interaction. Period. Polytech. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2017;61:198–208. doi: 10.3311/PPee.10313.
    1. Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., Zourmpakis, A.I.: Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature. Educ. Sci. 11, 1–36 (2021). 10.3390/educsci11010022
    1. Guillén-Nieto V, Aleson-Carbonell M. Serious games and learning effectiveness: The case of It’s a Deal! Comput. Educ. 2012;58:435–448. doi: 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2011.07.015.
    1. Tahmosybayat, R., Baker, K., Godfrey, A., Caplan, N., Barry, G.: Move Well: Design Deficits in Postural Based Exergames. What are We Missing? 2018 IEEE Games, Entertain. Media Conf. GEM 2018. (2018). 10.1109/GEM.2018.8516516.
    1. Arango-López, J., Gallardo, J., Gutiérrez, F.L., Cerezo, E., Amengual, E., Valera, R.: Pervasive games: Giving a meaning based on the player experience. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. pp. 1–4. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2017). 10.1145/3123818.3123832.
    1. Clark JE, Lanphear AK, Riddick CC. The effects of videogame playing on the response selection processing of elderly adults. J. Gerontol. 1987;42:82–85. doi: 10.1093/geronj/42.1.82.
    1. Rienzo A, Cubillos C. Playability and player experience in digital games for elderly: A systematic literature review. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020;20:1–23. doi: 10.3390/s20143958.
    1. Kasapakis V, Gavalas D. Pervasive gaming: Status, trends and design principles. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2015;55:213–236. doi: 10.1016/J.JNCA.2015.05.009.
    1. Possler, D., Klimmt, C., Schlütz, D., Walkenbach, J.: A Mature Kind of Fun? Exploring Silver Gamers’ Motivation to Play Casual Games – Results from a Large-Scale Online Survey. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 10298, 280–295 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_23.
    1. Fiorini JM, Barros DJR, M., Bento, E.B. Gamification to promote digital inclusion of the elderly. Iber: Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol. Cist; 2017.
    1. Greipl S, Moeller K, Kiili K, Ninaus M. Different performance, full experience: A learning game applied throughout adulthood. Int. J. Serious Games. 2020;7:61–80. doi: 10.17083/ijsg.v7i3.359.
    1. Poulova, P., Simonova, I.: Blended Learning as Means of Support Within the Elderly People Education. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L., Ma, W.W.K., Lee, L.-K., and Yang, H. (eds.) Blended Learning. New Challenges and Innovative Practices. pp. 3–14. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017).
    1. Wouters, E.J.M., Nieboer, M.E., Nieboer, K.A., Moonen, M.J.G.A., Peek, S.T.M., Sponselee, A.-M.A.G., van Hoof, J., van der Voort, C.S., Luijkx, K.G.: How to Guide the Use of Technology for Ageing-in-Place? An Evidence-Based Educational Module. In: Zhou, J. and Salvendy, G. (eds.) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Aging, Design and User Experience. pp. 486–497. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017).
    1. Sauvé L, Kaufman D. User-Centered design: an effective approach for creating online educational games for seniors. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2020;1220:262–284. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58459-7_13.
    1. Cesta A, Cortellessa G, De Benedictis R, Fracasso F. ExPLoRAA: An intelligent tutoring system for active ageing in (Flexible) time and space. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2019;2333:92–109.
    1. Smeddinck, J.D., Herrlich, M., Malaka, R.: Exergames for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation: A Medium-Term Situated Study of Motivational Aspects and Impact on Functional Reach. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 4143–4146. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2015). 10.1145/2702123.2702598.
    1. Seaborn K, Pennefather P, Fels DI. Eudaimonia and hedonia in the design and evaluation of a cooperative game for psychosocial well-being. Human-Comput. Interact. 2020;35:289–337. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2018.1555481.
    1. Kappen DL, Nacke LE, Gerling KM, Tsotsos LE. Design strategies for gamified physical activity applications for older adults. Proc: Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci; 2016.
    1. Marcos-Pardo, P.J., Martínez-Rodríguez, A., Gil-Arias, A.: Impact of a motivational resistance-training programme on adherence and body composition in the elderly OPEN. 10.1038/s41598-018-19764-6.
    1. Nap, H.H., Kort, Y.A.W. De, IJsselsteijn, W.A.: Senior gamers: Preferences, motivations and needs. Gerontechnology. 8, 0–16 (2009). 10.4017/gt.2009.08.04.003.00.
    1. Yu, R.W.L., Yuen, W.H., Peng, L., Chan, A.H.S.: Acceptance Level of Older Chinese People Towards Video Shooting Games. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 12208 LNCS, 707–718 (2020). 10.1007/978-3-030-50249-2_50.
    1. Ahmad, F., Zongwei, L., Ahmed, Z., Muneeb, S.: Behavioral profiling: a generationwide study of players’ experiences during brain games play. Interact. Learn. Environ. 0, 1–14 (2020). 10.1080/10494820.2020.1827440.
    1. De Vries AW, Van Dieën JH, Van Den Abeele V, Verschueren SMP. Understanding Motivations and Player Experiences of Older Adults in Virtual Reality Training. Games Health J. 2018;7:369–376. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2018.0008.
    1. Altmeyer, M., Lessel, P., Krüger, A.: Investigating gamification for seniors aged 75+. DIS 2018 - Proc. 2018 Des. Interact. Syst. Conf. 453–458 (2018). 10.1145/3196709.3196799.
    1. Razak FHA, Azhar NHC, Adnan WAW, Nasruddin ZA. Exploring Malay older user motivation to play mobile games. 2017 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_44.
    1. Chesham A, Wyss P, Müri RM, Mosimann UP, Nef T. What older people like to play: Genre preferences and acceptance of casual games. JMIR Serious Games. 2017;5:1–11. doi: 10.2196/games.7025.
    1. Carvalho, R.N.S. De, Ishitani, L.: Motivational Factors for Mobile Serious Games for Elderly Users. XI Simpósio Bras. Jogos e Entretenimento Digit. - SBGames 2012. 19–28 (2012).
    1. Yang HL, Lin SL. The reasons why elderly mobile users adopt ubiquitous mobile social service. Comput. Human Behav. 2019;93:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.005.
    1. Khalili-Mahani, N., de Schutter, B., Sawchuk, K.: The Relationship Between the Seniors’ Appraisal of Cognitive-Training Games and Game-Related Stress Is Complex: A Mixed-Methods Study. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 12426 LNCS, 586–607 (2020). 10.1007/978-3-030-60149-2_45.
    1. Khalili-Mahani N, De Schutter B. Affective game planning for health applications: Quantitative extension of gerontoludic design based on the appraisal theory of stress and coping. JMIR Serious Games. 2019;7:1–18. doi: 10.2196/13303.
    1. Carstensen, L.L., Hartel, C.R.: When I’m 64. National Academies Press (US) (2006). 10.17226/11474.
    1. Chu, K., Wong, C.Y., Khong, C.W.: Methodologies for evaluating player experience in game play. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 173 CCIS, 118–122 (2011). 10.1007/978-3-642-22098-2_24.
    1. Sánchez JLG, Vela FLG, Simarro FM, Padilla-Zea N. Playability: Analysing user experience in video games. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2012;31:1033–1054. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.710648.
    1. Salazar Cardona J, Gutiérrez Vela FL, Lopez Arango J, Gallardo J. Game-based systems: Towards a new proposal for playability analysis. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2021;3082:47–56.
    1. González, J.L., Gutierrez, F.L.: Caracterización de la experiencia del jugador en videojuegos., (2010).
    1. Ijsselsteijn, W.A., Kort, D., Poels, Y.A.W.&: GAME EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2013).
    1. Rigby, S., Ryan, R.: The Player Experience of Need Satisfaction (PENS) An applied model and methodology for understanding key components of the player experience. (2004).
    1. Brooke, J.: SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. In: Usability Evaluation In Industry. pp. 207–212 (1995). 10.1201/9781498710411-35.
    1. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1989;13:319–339. doi: 10.2307/249008.
    1. Isbister, K., Schaffer, N.: The Four Fun Keys. In: Game Usability. pp. 317–343. Elsevier (2008). 10.1016/b978-0-12-374447-0.00020-2.
    1. Cota TT, Ishitani L, Vieira N. Mobile game design for the elderly: A study with focus on the motivation to play. Comput. Human Behav. 2015;51:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.026.
    1. Xu, W., Liang, H.N., Yu, K., Baghaei, N.: Efect of Gameplay Uncertainty, Display Type, and Age on Virtual Reality Exergames. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (2021). 10.1145/3411764.3445801.
    1. Sayago S, Rosales A, Righi V, Ferreira SM, Coleman GW, Blat J. On the conceptualization, design, and evaluation of appealing, meaningful, and playable digital games for older people. Games Cult. 2016;11:53–80. doi: 10.1177/1555412015597108.
    1. IJsselsteijn, W., Nap, H.H., De Kort, Y., Poels, K.: Digital game design for elderly users. Proc. 2007 Conf. Futur. Play. Futur. Play ’07. 17–22 (2007). 10.1145/1328202.1328206.
    1. Santos LH, Okamoto K, Hiragi S, Yamamoto G, Sugiyama O, Aoyama T, Kuroda T. Pervasive game design to evaluate social interaction effects on levels of physical activity among older adults. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng. 2019;6:205566831984444. doi: 10.1177/2055668319844443.
    1. Salazar JA, Arango J, Gutiérrez FL, Moreira F. Older adults and games from a perspective of playability, game experience and pervasive environments: A systematics literature review. World Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol. 2022;2022:444–453. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-04819-7_42.
    1. Kitchenham B, Charters S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Engineering. 2007;2:1051. doi: 10.1145/1134285.1134500.
    1. De Schutter B, Malliet S. The older player of digital games: A classification based on perceived need satisfaction. Communications. 2014;39:67–88. doi: 10.1515/commun-2014-0005.
    1. Brown, J.A.: Digital gaming perceptions among older adult non-gamers. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 10298, 217–227 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_18.
    1. Gerling, K.M., Mandryk, R.L., Linehan, C.: Long-term use of motion-based video games in care home settings. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 2015-April, 1573–1582 (2015). 10.1145/2702123.2702125.
    1. World Health Organization: WHO | 10 facts on ageing and the life course, , last Accessed 2022 May 30.
    1. Marston HR. Design recommendations for digital game design within an ageing society. Educ. Gerontol. 2013;39:103–118. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2012.689936.
    1. Kaufman D, Sauvé L, Renaud L, Sixsmith A, Mortenson B. Older Adults’ digital gameplay: patterns, benefits, and challenges. Simul. Gaming. 2016;47:465–489. doi: 10.1177/1046878116645736.
    1. Leite Araujo R, Da Silva Sena T, Takako Endo P. Gamification applied to an elderly monitoring system during the COVID-19 pandemic. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 2021;19:1074–1082. doi: 10.1109/tla.2021.9451254.
    1. Shao D, Lee IJ. Acceptance and influencing factors of social virtual reality in the urban elderly. Sustain. 2020;12:1–19. doi: 10.3390/su12229345.
    1. Rosenberg D, Depp CA, Vahia IV, Reichstadt J, Palmer BW, Kerr J, Norman G, Jeste DV. Exergames for subsyndromal depression in older adults: A pilot study of a novel intervention. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2010;18:221–226. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c534b5.
    1. Kaufman, D.: Socioemotional Benefits of Digital Games for Older Adults. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 10298, 242–253 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_20.
    1. Wu YS, Chang TW, Datta S. HiGame: Improving elderly well-being through horticultural interaction. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 2016;14:263–276. doi: 10.1177/1478077116663349.
    1. De Schutter, B., Vanden Abeele, V.: Designing meaningful play within the psycho-social context of older adults. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. 84–93 (2010). 10.1145/1823818.1823827.
    1. Goršič, M., Darzi, A., Novak, D.: Comparison of two difficulty adaptation strategies for competitive arm rehabilitation exercises. IEEE Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot. 640–645 (2017). 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009320.
    1. Gajadhar, B.J., Nap, H.H., De Kort, Y.A.W., Ijsselsteijn, W.A.: Out of sight, out of mind: Co-player effects on seniors’ player experience. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. 74–83 (2010). 10.1145/1823818.1823826.
    1. Roberts AR, De Schutter B, Franks K, Radina ME. Older Adults’ experiences with audiovisual virtual reality: perceived usefulness and other factors influencing technology acceptance. Clin. Gerontol. 2019;42:27–33. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2018.1442380.
    1. Khalili-Mahani, N., Assadi, A., Li, K., Mirgholami, M., Rivard, M.E., Benali, H., Sawchuk, K., De Schutter, B.: Reflective and reflexive stress responses of older adults to three gaming experiences in relation to their cognitive abilities: Mixed methods crossover study. JMIR Ment. Heal. 7, (2020). 10.2196/12388.
    1. Löckenhoff CE, Carstensen LL. Socioemotionol selectivity theory, aging, and health: The increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. J. Pers. 2004;72:1395–1424. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00301.x.
    1. Merilampi, S., Koivisto, A., Sirkka, A., Raumonen, P., Virkki, J., Xiao, X., Min, Y., Ye, L., Chujun, X., Chen, J.: The cognitive mobile games for older adults-A Chinese user experience study. 2017 IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Serious Games Appl. Heal. SeGAH 2017. (2017). 10.1109/SeGAH.2017.7939280.
    1. Merilampi, S., Koivisto, A., Virkki, J.: Activation game for older adults - Development and initial user experiences. 2018 IEEE 6th Int. Conf. Serious Games Appl. Heal. SeGAH 2018. 1–5 (2018). 10.1109/SeGAH.2018.8401351.
    1. Mace M, Kinany N, Rinne P, Rayner A, Bentley P, Burdet E. Balancing the playing field: Collaborative gaming for physical training. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2017;14:1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0319-x.
    1. Pereira, F., Bermudez I Badia, S., Jorge, C., Da Silva Cameirao, M.: Impact of Game Mode on Engagement and Social Involvement in Multi-User Serious Games with Stroke Patients. Int. Conf. Virtual Rehabil. ICVR. 2019-July, 1–14 (2019). 10.1109/ICVR46560.2019.8994505.
    1. Zhou, J., Salvendy, G.: Human aspects of IT for the aged population applications, services and contexts: Third international conference, ITAP 2017 held as part of HCI international 2017 vancouver, BC, Canada, july 9–14, 2017 proceedings, Part II. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 10298, (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9.
    1. Cerezo, E., Blasco, A.C.: The Space Journey game: An intergenerational pervasive experience. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 1–6 (2019). 10.1145/3290607.3313055.
    1. Vanden Abeele, V., De Schutter, B.: Designing intergenerational play via enactive interaction, competition and acceleration. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2009 145. 14, 425–433 (2010). 10.1007/S00779-009-0262-3.
    1. Zhang, F.: Intergenerational Play Between Young People and Old Family Members: Patterns, Benefits, and Challenges. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 10926 LNCS, 581–593 (2018). 10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_44.
    1. Pearce, C.: The Truth About Baby Boomer Gamers: A Study of Over-Forty Computer Game Players. Games Cult. 142–174 (2008).
    1. Wang YL, Hou HT, Tsai CC. A systematic literature review of the impacts of digital games designed for older adults. Educ. Gerontol. 2020;46:1–17. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2019.1694448.
    1. Lee S, Oh H, Shi CK, Doh YY. Mobile game design guide to improve gaming experience for the middle-Aged and older adult population: User-centered design approach. JMIR Serious Games. 2021;9:1–18. doi: 10.2196/24449.
    1. Velazquez A, Martínez-García AI, Favela J, Ochoa SF. Adaptive exergames to support active aging: An action research study. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2017;34:60–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.09.002.
    1. Zhang F, Hausknecht S, Schell R, Kaufman D. Factors affecting the gaming experience of older adults in community and senior centres. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2017;739:464–475. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-63184-4_24.
    1. Broneder, E., Weiß, C., Puck, M., Puck, S., Sandner, E., Papp, A., Fernández Domínguez, G., Sili, M.: TACTILE – A Novel Mixed Reality System for Training and Social Interaction. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 1226 CCIS, 12–20 (2020). 10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_2.
    1. Tabak M, De Vette F, Van DIjk, H., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. A game-based, physical activity coaching application for older adults: Design approach and user experience in daily life. Games Health J. 2020;9:215–226. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2018.0163.
    1. Loos, E.: Exergaming: Meaningful Play for Older Adults? Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 10298, 254–265 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_21.
    1. Vasconcelos, A., Silva, P.A., Caseiro, J., Nunes, F., Teixeira, L.F.: Designing tablet-based games for seniors: The example of CogniPlay, a cognitive gaming platform. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. 1–10 (2012). 10.1145/2367616.2367617.
    1. Doroudian, A., Loos, E., Ter Vrugt, A., Kaufman, D.: Designing an Online Escape Game for Older Adults: The Implications of Playability Testing Sessions with a Variety of Dutch Players. (2020). 10.1007/978-3-030-50249-2_42.
    1. Jali, S.K., Arnab, S.: The perspectives of older people on digital gaming: Interactions with console and tablet-based games. Lect. Notes Inst. Comput. Sci. Soc. Telecommun. Eng. LNICST. 176 LNICST, 82–90 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-51055-2_11.
    1. Niksirat, K.S., Silpasuwanchai, C., Ren, X., Wang, Z.: Towards cognitive enhancement of the elderly: A UX study of a multitasking motion video game. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. Part F1276, 2017–2024 (2017). 10.1145/3027063.3053105.
    1. Wang, X., Niksirat, K.S., Silpasuwanchai, C., Wang, Z., Ren, X., Niu, Z.: How skill balancing impact the elderly player experience? Int. Conf. Signal Process. Proceedings, ICSP. 0, 983–988 (2016). 10.1109/ICSP.2016.7877976.
    1. Pyae A, Raitoharju R, Luimula M, Pitkäkangas P, Smed J. Serious games and active healthy ageing: A pilot usability testing of existing games. Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organ. 2016;16:103–120. doi: 10.1504/IJNVO.2016.075129.
    1. Mol, A.M., Silva, R.S., Ishitani, L.: Design recommendations for the development of virtual reality focusing on the elderly. Iber. Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol. Cist. 2019-June, 19–22 (2019). 10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760890.
    1. Kari, T.: Exergaming experiences of older adults: A critical incident study. 32nd Bled eConference Humaniz. Technol. a Sustain. Soc. BLED 2019 - Conf. Proc. 639–654 (2020). 10.18690/978-961-286-280-0.34.
    1. Broady T, Chan A, Caputi P. Comparison of older and younger adults’ attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2010;41:473–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00914.x.
    1. McLaughlin A, Gandy M, Allaire J, Whitlock L. Putting fun into video games for older adults. Ergon. Des. 2012;20:13–22. doi: 10.1177/1064804611435654.
    1. Eggenberger P, Wolf M, Schumann M, de Bruin ED. Exergame and balance training modulate prefrontal brain activity during walking and enhance executive function in older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00066.
    1. Gorsic, M., Tran, M.H., Novak, D.: Cooperative Cooking: A Novel Virtual Environment for Upper Limb Rehabilitation. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBS. 2018-July, 3602–3605 (2018). 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513005.
    1. Pyae, A., Joelsson, T., Saarenpää, T., Mika, L., Kattimeri, C., Pitkäkangas, P., Granholm, P., Smed, J.: Lessons Learned from Two Usability Studies of Digital Skiing Game with Elderly People in Finland and Japan. Int. J. Serious Games. 4, 37–52 (2017). 10.17083/ijsg.v4i4.183.
    1. Jeremic J, Zhang F, Kaufman D. Older Adults’ perceptions about commercially available xbox kinect exergames. Springer International Publishing. 2019 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-22012-9_14.
    1. Borrego G, Morán AL, Meza V, Orihuela-Espina F, Sucar LE. Key factors that influence the UX of a dual-player game for the cognitive stimulation and motor rehabilitation of older adults. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s10209-020-00746-3.
    1. Zhou, J., Salvendy, G.: Human aspects of IT for the aged population applications, services and contexts: Third international conference, ITAP 2017 held as part of HCI international 2017 vancouver, BC, Canada, july 9–14, 2017 proceedings, Part II. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 10298, 217–227 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9.
    1. Syed-Abdul S, Malwade S, Nursetyo AA, Sood M, Bhatia M, Barsasella D, Liu MF, Chang CC, Srinivasan K, Raja M, Li YCJ. Virtual reality among the elderly: A usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8.
    1. Hwang, M.Y., Hong, J.C., Hao, Y. wei, Jong, J.T.: Elders’ usability, dependability, and flow experiences on embodied interactive video games. Educ. Gerontol. 37, 715–731 (2011). 10.1080/03601271003723636.
    1. Hera, T.D. la, Loos, E., Simons, M., Blom, J.: Benefits and factors influencing the design of intergenerational digital games: A Systematic Literature Review. Soc. 2017, Vol. 7, Page 18. 7, 18 (2017). 10.3390/SOC7030018.
    1. Gerling, K., Mandryk, R.: Designing video games for older adults and caregivers. (2014).
    1. Khoo ET, Merritt T, Cheok AD. Designing physical and social intergenerational family entertainment. Interact. Comput. 2009;21:76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.009.
    1. De Oliveira Santos, L.H., Okamoto, K., Funghetto, S.S., Cavalli, A.S., Hiragi, S., Yamamoto, G., Sugiyama, O., Castanho, C.D., Aoyama, T., Kuroda, T.: Effects of social interaction mechanics in pervasive games on the physical activity levels of older adults: Quasi-experimental study. JMIR Serious Games. 7, (2019). 10.2196/13962.
    1. Lankes, M., Hagler, J., Gattringer, F., Stiglbauer, B.: InterPlayces: Results of an intergenerational games study. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 10622 LNCS, 85–97 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-70111-0_8.
    1. Goršič M, Cikajlo I, Goljar N, Novak D. A multisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2017;14:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0336-9.
    1. Goršič M, Cikajlo I, Novak D. Competitive and cooperative arm rehabilitation games played by a patient and unimpaired person: effects on motivation and exercise intensity. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2017;14:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0231-4.
    1. Buchem, I., Merceron, A., Kreutel, J., Haesner, M., Steinert, A.: Gamification designs in Wearable enhanced learning for healthy ageing. Proc. 2015 Int. Conf. Interact. Mob. Commun. Technol. Learn. IMCL 2015. 9–15 (2015). 10.1109/IMCTL.2015.7359545.
    1. Seaborn K, Fels DI. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2015;74:14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006.
    1. Ni, P.: 5 Ways to Motivate and Encourage Seniors. . 1–5 (2015).
    1. Pan, Z., Miao, C., Yu, H., Leung, C., Chin, J.J.: The effects of familiarity design on the adoption of wellness games by the elderly. Proc. - 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Jt. Conf. Web Intell. Intell. Agent Technol. WI-IAT 2015. 2, 387–390 (2016). 10.1109/WI-IAT.2015.198.
    1. Ferreira SM, Sayago S, Blat J. Towards iTV services for older people: Exploring their interactions with online video portals in different cultural backgrounds. Technol. Disabil. 2014;26:199–209. doi: 10.3233/TAD-140419.
    1. Yang YC. Role-play in virtual reality game for the senior. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. Part. 2019;F1483:31–35. doi: 10.1145/3323771.3323812.
    1. Zhang, H., Wu, Q., Miao, C., Shen, Z., Leung, C.: Towards Age-friendly Exergame Design: The role of familiarity. CHI Play 2019 - Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Interact. Play. 45–57 (2019). 10.1145/3311350.3347191.
    1. Zhang H, Miao C, Wang D. Familiarity design in exergames for elderly. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 2016;22:1–19.
    1. Blocker KA, Wright TJ, Boot WR. Gaming preferences of aging generations. Gerontechnology. 2014;12:174–184. doi: 10.4017/gt.2014.12.3.008.00.
    1. ESA ‘Entertainment Software Association’: 2019 ESSENTIAL FACTS About the Computer and Video Game Industry. (2019).
    1. Kappen, D.L., Orji, R.: Gamified and persuasive systems as behavior change agents for health and wellness. XRDS Crossroads, ACM Mag. Students. 24, 52–55 (2017). 10.1145/3123750.
    1. Rice, M., Koh, R., Liu, Q., He, Q., Wan, M., Yeo, V., Ng, J., Tan, W.P.: Comparing Avatar Game Representation Preferences across Three Age Groups. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. 2013-April, 1161–1166 (2013). 10.1145/2468356.2468564.
    1. Kayama H, Okamoto K, Nishiguchi S, Nagai K, Yamada M, Aoyama T. Concept software based on kinect for assessing dual-task ability of elderly people. Games Health J. 2012;1:348–352. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2012.0019.
    1. Pyae, A., Luimula, M., Smed, J.: Investigating the usability of interactive physical activity games for elderly: A pilot study. 6th IEEE Conf. Cogn. Infocommunications, CogInfoCom 2015 - Proc. 185–193 (2015). 10.1109/CogInfoCom.2015.7390588.
    1. Xu W, Liang HN, Zhang Z, Baghaei N. Studying the effect of display type and viewing perspective on user experience in virtual reality exergames. Games Health J. 2020;9:405–414. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2019.0102.
    1. Boyle EA, Connolly TM, Hainey T, Boyle JM. Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Comput. Human Behav. 2012;28:771–780. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.020.
    1. Carr D. Play and pleasure. UK Cambridge: Comput. Games Text Narrat. Play. Polity Press; 2006.
    1. Quiñones D, Rusu C, Rusu V. A methodology to develop usability/user experience heuristics. Comput. Stand. Interfaces. 2018;59:109–129. doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2018.03.002.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться